26 Penetration Testing Companies in Poland (2026)

Last updated: August 17, 2026

Executive Answer

Poland has a strong mix of specialist offensive-security firms, broader cyber consultancies, and international providers serving Polish organizations. The right choice depends on scope: application testing, cloud, red teaming, OT/ICS, or DORA-aligned TLPT. This 2026 comparison reviews 26 providers using current first-party evidence, separates genuine Polish offices from cross-border delivery, and explains how to compare proposals. DeepStrike is listed first because it publishes this guide; the ordering is editorial, not an independent certification. Buyers should verify the named test team, methodology, reporting, retesting, data handling, and availability before signing.

Disclosure and Evidence Date

Disclosure: DeepStrike publishes this comparison and is included in it. DeepStrike was assessed with the same public-evidence rubric as every other provider, but this is not an independent ranking. “Best for” labels describe editorial use-case fit, not a guarantee of engagement quality. Provider evidence was checked on August 17, 2026.

Quick Picks

These are starting points, not automatic winners. A provider that is excellent for a Warsaw bank may be a poor fit for a two-week API release, and an application specialist may not be qualified to test a live industrial process safely.

What Changed for Polish Buyers in 2026?

Poland’s amended National Cybersecurity System Act, commonly discussed as the KSC implementation of NIS2, was published on March 2, 2026 and entered into force on April 3, 2026. It expands the population of key and important entities and raises expectations for documented cyber-risk management. The law does not make one generic penetration-test format mandatory for every organization, so scope should follow the entity’s systems, risks, and specific obligations.

For organizations that must self-register rather than being entered automatically, the Ministry of Digital Affairs opened registration on May 7, 2026 and states an application deadline of October 3, 2026. Registration and security implementation are different tasks: a pentest can produce technical evidence, but it does not replace governance, incident reporting, supplier controls, or an information-security management system.

The threat environment also changed. CERT Polska’s official 2025 report records 658,320 reports and 260,783 incidents, up 152% year over year. It classifies 253,238 incidents as computer fraud, representing 97% of handled incidents. Those categories are not a count of exploitable vulnerabilities, but the CERT Polska 2025 data supports a more frequent and risk-based testing program for exposed and high-value systems.

DORA has applied since January 17, 2025. It requires a digital operational resilience testing program across the financial sector, while threat-led penetration testing is reserved for selected financial entities and is generally required at least every three years under DORA Article 26. A standard application pentest and a regulator-aligned TLPT engagement are not interchangeable.

The detailed EU standards for TLPT are set out in Delegated Regulation (EU) 2025/1190. Buyers should ask whether a provider can support threat intelligence, scoped live-system testing, white-team governance, risk controls, evidence, and remediation closure rather than accepting a normal pentest relabeled as TLPT.

GDPR Article 32 requires a process for regularly testing, assessing, and evaluating the effectiveness of technical and organizational security measures. The regulation does not prescribe penetration testing by name, so the test type, frequency, and scope should be justified by risk, processing context, and the systems that protect personal data.

For banks, KNF Recommendation D is more specific: section 9.21 says penetration tests are among the tools that should be used systematically to assess controls in highly significant ICT environments. This is banking supervisory guidance, not a universal rule for every company operating in Poland.

How We Selected and Ordered the Providers

A company qualified for this comparison only when its current first-party website described a real penetration-testing or closely related offensive-security service. It also needed a Polish office or legal entity, a Poland-based team, or a credible cross-border delivery model for Polish organizations. Directory-only listings and tool resellers without a clearly documented human testing service were excluded.

The editorial rubric weights service evidence and technical depth at 30%, Poland delivery relevance at 20%, scope and specialization at 15%, reporting and remediation transparency at 15%, regulated-sector alignment at 10%, and public-evidence recency at 10%. The list does not score private proposals, undisclosed tester experience, or customer references that cannot be checked publicly.

The order is useful for discovery, but the final selection should happen at the engagement level. Ask who will actually perform the test, what percentage of effort is manual, which assets and roles are included, how production risk is controlled, and whether the same team handles retesting.

Match the Engagement to the Requirement

Do not start procurement with “we need a pentest.” Start with the decision the report must support.

For a product scope, a dedicated web application penetration test should include authenticated roles, APIs, authorization boundaries, business logic, and validated impact—not only an unauthenticated scanner output.

A mobile application penetration test should cover the app, the backend APIs it relies on, local storage, platform-specific controls, and relevant iOS or Android behavior.

For AWS, Azure, or Google Cloud, a cloud penetration test should define identity paths, tenant or account boundaries, allowed techniques, logging, and provider rules before testing starts.

AI-enabled products need scope beyond a conventional web test. An LLM and AI application assessment may need to cover model-facing inputs, tool use, authorization, data exposure, and abuse paths while keeping the engagement defensive and controlled.

Choose red teaming when the objective is to test whether people, processes, and controls can detect and contain a realistic adversary—not when the only requirement is a vulnerability list for one application.

All 26 Providers Compared

Provider Profiles

1. DeepStrike — Best for Continuous Product Security

DeepStrike is an international offensive-security provider serving Polish and EU organizations remotely. Its public penetration testing service describes manual testing, validated findings, a live dashboard, Slack collaboration, remediation guidance, retesting, and compliance-oriented deliverables. It is not a Poland-headquartered company and does not claim a Polish office.

The company publishes a penetration testing pricing page, but buyers should still normalize asset counts, roles, environments, tester effort, reporting, and retesting when comparing its proposal with local quotes.

DeepStrike is listed first because it publishes this article. Its differentiator is the combination of hands-on testing and an integrated remediation workflow rather than local physical presence. The company’s current About page states that it was founded in 2016 from a bug-bounty background.

2. SecuRing — Best for Specialist Enterprise Testing

SecuRing, presented online under the Securing brand, is based in Kraków and focuses on security testing and offensive research. Its current service pages cover web and mobile applications, identity and access management, cloud and infrastructure work, and red-team operations.

This is a strong shortlist candidate when an enterprise needs manual depth across a complex application or identity estate. Ask the proposal to name the delivery team, allocate tester-days by asset, define code-review boundaries, and state whether social engineering or physical objectives are included in a red-team scope.

3. AFINE — Best for DORA TLPT and Critical Systems

AFINE is a Warsaw-based offensive-security company. Its website describes manual security assessments, red teaming, DORA TLPT, and testing for banking, healthcare, and critical infrastructure. The company also publishes a substantial body of vulnerability research and states that it holds ISO 27001 certification.

AFINE fits financial entities that need a provider able to discuss threat intelligence, realistic attack scenarios, live-system safety, white-team coordination, and compliance evidence. Buyers should still confirm whether the proposed engagement is a full TLPT under the applicable framework or a conventional pentest with DORA-oriented reporting.

4. LogicalTrust — Best for Broad Application and Cloud Scope

LogicalTrust is based in Wrocław. Its public portfolio includes web and mobile testing, source-code review, cloud and container assessments, infrastructure work, ransomware simulation, red-versus-blue exercises, and SCADA-related testing.

The breadth is useful when one procurement cycle must cover several technical layers. To avoid a shallow “one team does everything” engagement, ask for named specialists by workstream, an effort breakdown, testing prerequisites, and separate deliverables for application, cloud, and infrastructure findings.

5. Securitum — Best for Documented Testing and TLPT

Securitum is a Kraków penetration-testing company operating since 2009. Its current website documents web, mobile, infrastructure, desktop, cloud, code-review, and red-team services. It also publishes DORA material that describes TLPT, and it makes sanitized public reports available.

The public evidence makes Securitum a useful candidate for regulated buyers that want to inspect reporting style before procurement. Its site has a pricing area, but the final quote still needs an agreed scope, effort, assumptions, and retest terms. Confirm which published service and which named testers apply to the specific engagement.

6. CyberForces — Best for Scalable Multi-Scope Delivery

CyberForces is the cybersecurity brand of TestArmy Group in Wrocław. Its current site describes web and mobile testing, network and infrastructure assessments, IoT work, source-code review, red-team and blue-team exercises, and social engineering.

The combination of software-delivery heritage and offensive services can fit mid-market or enterprise teams with several applications. Procurement should separate QA from security-testing effort, identify the senior tester responsible for each asset, and require a sample security report rather than assuming the same deliverable is used across all service lines.

7. Niebezpiecznik — Best for Social Engineering and Training

Niebezpiecznik is widely known in Poland for security media and training, and it also offers commercial penetration testing from Kraków. Its service page covers web and mobile applications, networks and systems, phishing and social engineering, physical intrusion, and red-team work.

The provider is most distinctive when technical testing must be combined with realistic human-layer exercises or awareness activity. Buyers should define target groups, privacy limits, pretexts, data retention, emergency contacts, and success criteria carefully. Do not infer individual tester certifications from the strength of the public brand; request current evidence for the assigned team.

8. REDTEAM — Best for Offensive Testing Plus DFIR

REDTEAM.PL is a Warsaw-based specialist with public services across infrastructure, applications, IT/OT, IoT, SCADA, red teaming, social engineering, digital forensics, incident response, threat hunting, and selected blockchain work.

That combination is attractive when an organization wants the same partner to test preventive controls and support investigations or response. For industrial scope, ask which techniques are permitted in production, how the team models safety impact, and whether the final report separates exploitable cyber risk from operational consequences.

9. CQURE — Best for Windows and Identity Environments

CQURE is a Poland-based cybersecurity company associated with deep Windows, identity, and infrastructure expertise. Its public offering includes custom penetration testing, emergency incident response, infrastructure consulting, and advanced training.

It can be a strong fit for Active Directory, privileged-access, or Microsoft-heavy estates where configuration and attack paths matter as much as a vulnerability list. Ask the proposal to distinguish architecture review, configuration assessment, assumed-breach testing, and full exploitation, because those activities produce different evidence and risk.

10. Pentestica — Best for Testing Alongside Regulatory Work

Pentestica operates through Remote Admin Sp. z o.o. in Katowice. Its public site presents penetration testing and IT audits alongside support for frameworks and regulations including NIS2, DORA, and MiCA.

This profile can suit a buyer that wants technical findings translated into a broader compliance program. The proposal should state which tasks are hands-on offensive testing, which are document review, and which legal or regulatory interpretations remain the client’s responsibility. Ask for a technical sample report and the credentials of the assigned testers.

11. Prevenity — Best for Regulated and Critical Environments

Prevenity is a Warsaw company founded in 2010. Its services include web and mobile application testing, infrastructure assessments, source-code review, SCADA security, incident response, forensics, and malware analysis. Its public About page lists recognized security credentials and industrial clearances.

The portfolio fits regulated or sensitive organizations that need offensive testing and response capability from one supplier. For a live critical environment, require a safety plan, escalation tree, handling rules for sensitive findings, and a clear statement of whether any subcontractors will access the systems or data.

12. ISEC — Best for Application and Source-Code Analysis

ISEC is a Warsaw security company offering penetration tests, source-code analysis, vulnerability assessment, social-engineering tests, and research across web, mobile, network, operating-system, thick-client, and embedded targets.

It is a useful shortlist candidate when an application test must move below the HTTP layer into implementation details or embedded components. Buyers should define the source languages, repository size, build process, review depth, and whether code analysis supplements or replaces dynamic exploitation. The two activities should not be priced or evaluated as if they were identical.

13. nFlo — Best for Mixed IT and OT Scope

nFlo is based in Warsaw and publishes services for web applications, external and internal infrastructure, Wi-Fi, Active Directory, red teaming, and OT/ICS environments, alongside SOC and governance work.

The range can fit organizations that need one supplier across corporate IT and industrial networks. Require separate rules of engagement for each environment, identify any systems that cannot be actively tested, and ask how findings will be prioritized when cyber impact and operational availability point to different remediation choices.

14. SEQRED — Best for OT, ICS, and IoT

SEQRED is a Warsaw-based cybersecurity company with an explicit focus on penetration testing, red teaming, critical infrastructure, OT/ICS, and IoT environments.

It belongs on an industrial shortlist when safety, uptime, proprietary protocols, or cyber-physical consequences make a conventional enterprise-network test insufficient. Ask for relevant project examples under NDA, tester familiarity with the target vendors and protocols, a passive-first discovery plan, maintenance-window requirements, and jointly agreed stop conditions.

15. EXATEL — Best for Network and Telecom Environments

EXATEL is a Polish telecom and cybersecurity provider based in Warsaw. Its public pentesting service describes black-, gray-, and white-box approaches, manual verification, network and system scope, reports, and broader security services including managed monitoring.

The company is a natural candidate for complex network estates, telecommunications, or critical infrastructure that may benefit from a provider with engineering and operational capacity. Confirm that the offensive team is organizationally and technically distinct from any managed service being assessed, and define how conflicts or inherited configurations will be handled.

16. Grandmetric — Best for Engineering-Led Infrastructure Tests

Grandmetric is a Poznań-based network and systems engineering company that offers penetration testing across infrastructure, networks, applications, and websites using black-, gray-, and white-box models. Its service material describes reporting and optional retesting.

It can fit teams that want findings interpreted by engineers who understand routing, wireless, data-center, and enterprise-network design. Ask how much application depth is available when the scope spans both infrastructure and software, and make the optional retest explicit in the commercial schedule.

17. Nomios Poland — Best for Security Integration Plus Testing

Nomios Poland operates as part of a wider European network and security group. Its Poland site describes penetration testing, vulnerability analysis, wireless assessments, and broader professional security services.

This model can suit an enterprise that wants an integrator to test and improve a complex network or security stack. Independence must be managed when the same supplier designed or resold part of the environment. Define whether the test team is separate, require disclosure of conflicts, and ensure the report covers weaknesses in supplied products and configurations without commercial filtering.

18. CYBERBLOCK — Best for Mid-Market Technical Assessments

CYBERBLOCK offers penetration tests and security audits covering networks, applications, information systems, and social-engineering scenarios. Its public material positions the work within wider NIS2 and data-protection concerns.

The provider may fit small and mid-market organizations that want a focused technical assessment without a large consulting program. Buyers should insist on a clear asset inventory, tester-days, manual-testing description, evidence format, and retest terms so a lower-complexity procurement process does not produce an ambiguous deliverable.

19. Pentesters — Best for Focused Testing and Resilience

Pentesters is based in Poznań and publicly lists penetration testing, IT security audits, incident analysis, and DDoS resilience testing.

It is worth considering when the scope is tightly defined or includes availability testing. DDoS work has distinct operational and third-party risks, so the rules of engagement must identify upstream providers, traffic limits, emergency contacts, test windows, and abort thresholds. A normal vulnerability test does not demonstrate DDoS resilience, and the two should be scoped separately.

20. VIPentest — Best for Flexible App and Infrastructure Scope

VIPentest is a Poland-based provider offering tests for applications, APIs, infrastructure, and related security-audit work. Its public materials discuss common penetration-testing methodologies and multiple technical target types.

It can suit buyers seeking a flexible specialist rather than a multi-workstream consultancy. Request a quote tied to named assets and roles, not only a number of days. Confirm who performs the work, the reporting language, how critical findings are escalated, and whether retesting and an attestation letter are included.

21. ChangePro — Best for Methodology-Driven Manual Testing

ChangePro is based in Poznań and describes manual black-, gray-, and white-box testing for web and mobile applications, APIs, wireless networks, segmentation, DDoS exposure, fuzzing, and social engineering.

The breadth of documented methods makes it useful for buyers who already know the assurance question they need to answer. Convert methodology names into concrete coverage: roles, endpoints, trust boundaries, test accounts, protocols, environments, and success criteria. Otherwise, two proposals can cite the same standard while budgeting very different levels of effort.

22. SISOFT — Best for Industrial and Automotive Scope

SISOFT is a Kraków cybersecurity consultancy founded in 2006. Its current penetration-testing page states that it tests web and mobile applications, network infrastructure, IoT/OT devices, and vehicles. It also describes prioritized recommendations and a retest to confirm fixes.

This is a strong replacement for a generic systems integrator in a pure provider comparison because the first-party service is specific and test-focused. SISOFT is particularly relevant to industrial or automotive buyers that also need audits or KSC/NIS2 support. Confirm production constraints, vehicle or device access, firmware scope, and the division between technical testing and compliance consulting.

23. Deloitte Poland — Best for DORA and Transformation Programs

Deloitte Poland is a broad consultancy rather than a pure-play penetration-testing boutique. Its Poland DORA material includes vulnerability scanning and penetration testing within operational-resilience testing and places that work alongside governance, risk, and transformation services.

It fits large financial or cross-border programs where offensive testing is one part of a larger workstream. Buyers should not assume that brand scale guarantees the assigned tester profile. Ask for named practitioners, exact tester-days, the delivery entity, subcontractor use, technical sample outputs, and separation between advisory, audit, and hands-on testing.

24. EY Poland — Best for Large Multi-Domain Testing

EY Poland’s public cybersecurity testing page covers web applications, source code, network infrastructure, cloud, red teaming, phishing, physical scenarios, and IT/OT environments.

The breadth and consulting capacity can support complex programs across business units or countries. The main procurement risk is scope dilution. Split the statement of work into technical work packages, identify leaders for each, define the evidence and retest process, and prevent governance workshops from consuming effort budgeted for hands-on testing.

25. PwC Poland — Best for Testing Plus Broader Advisory

PwC Poland publicly lists penetration testing, configuration review, security training, malware-related services, and cybersecurity work across IT and OT.

It can fit an organization that wants technical assessment connected to governance, transformation, or sector advisory. As with any large consultancy, evaluate the proposed team rather than the logo. Require role-specific CVs, effort by workstream, an escalation process for critical findings, and a report example that matches the intended technical audience.

26. KPMG Poland — Best for Enterprise Assurance Programs

KPMG Poland publishes a dedicated service for penetration testing of IT systems and applications within its wider cybersecurity practice. The broader portfolio includes red-team and advisory capabilities.

KPMG can suit an enterprise that needs testing integrated with governance, assurance, or regulatory work. Buyers should clarify whether the engagement is a vulnerability assessment, a penetration test, or an objective-led red team; identify the delivery team; and keep technical testing effort visible in the commercial breakdown.

DORA and TLPT: What to Ask a Provider

A DORA financial-entity assessment, a standard pentest, and TLPT serve different objectives. Do not select a TLPT provider based only on a web-application methodology or a generic DORA badge.

AFINE and Securitum publish specific TLPT offerings. Other providers may have relevant capabilities, but the proposal must prove the full delivery model. Treat “DORA-ready report” and “DORA TLPT” as different claims.

OT and ICS Penetration Testing Shortlist

OT/ICS testing should begin with architecture, process safety, vendor constraints, and passive discovery. A technique that is routine on a web application can disrupt a controller, engineering workstation, medical device, building system, or production process.

The safest provider is not necessarily the one promising the most exploitation. It is the one that can obtain useful evidence without creating unacceptable operational risk.

How to Compare Penetration Testing Quotes

Price comparisons fail when suppliers quote different assumptions. Give every shortlisted provider the same scoping pack and convert each response into a common table.

A continuous penetration testing model can make sense for products that release frequently, but it should not be purchased on the word “continuous” alone. Ask what triggers human testing, what assets remain covered, how quickly changes are reviewed, and how results flow into remediation.

Local Provider or Remote Specialist?

A Polish office can simplify onsite work, Polish-language reporting, procurement, data-handling discussions, and coordination with local stakeholders. It is especially valuable for physical, social-engineering, OT, or highly regulated engagements.

A remote specialist can be the better choice for a cloud service, API, SaaS platform, or niche technical problem when location does not constrain access. The tradeoff is not local versus good; it is delivery fit, communication, legal contracting, availability, and proven expertise for the exact target.

For either model, confirm the legal entity signing the contract, where evidence is stored, who can access it, which time zone governs urgent escalation, and whether subcontractors are used.

Frequently Asked Questions

How much does penetration testing cost in Poland?

There is no defensible market-wide price for a “pentest” because the unit is undefined. Cost changes with asset count, roles, source access, cloud accounts, tester-days, production restrictions, reporting, travel, and retesting. Compare fixed-fee, day-rate, and subscription proposals only after every provider prices the same scope. Ask for effort by workstream and list every inclusion and exclusion.

Is penetration testing legally required in Poland?

Sometimes a specific obligation, supervisory expectation, contract, or sector framework makes technical testing necessary, but most laws do not prescribe one universal pentest. The KSC Act requires risk-management and effectiveness measures for in-scope entities; GDPR requires regular evaluation of security measures; DORA includes resilience testing and TLPT for selected financial entities; and KNF Recommendation D specifically discusses systematic penetration tests for highly significant banking ICT environments.

What is the difference between a pentest, red team, and TLPT?

A penetration test searches a defined asset set for exploitable vulnerabilities. A red team pursues agreed objectives to test prevention, detection, and response across people, process, and technology. TLPT is a regulated, threat-led exercise for designated financial entities with specific governance, intelligence, live-system, evidence, and remediation requirements. They overlap technically but are not interchangeable deliverables.

Should we choose a Polish company or an international provider?

Choose based on the work. Local presence helps with onsite, physical, social-engineering, OT, language, contracting, and stakeholder coordination. International or remote delivery can be effective for web, API, cloud, code, and specialist product testing. Verify the contracting entity, data location, working hours, assigned testers, and ability to support urgent remediation before deciding.

Which penetration-testing certifications should we require?

Certifications such as OSCP, OSWE, OSEP, CREST, GIAC, and cloud-specific credentials can support a due-diligence decision, but they do not prove that the assigned tester fits the target. Ask for role-specific CVs, relevant project experience, a sanitized sample report, and a technical scoping conversation. Company-level ISO certification covers management processes, not the depth of every individual test.

How long does a penetration test take?

Duration depends on effort and access, not only calendar days. A focused assessment may use a small number of tester-days, while a multi-application, infrastructure, red-team, OT, or TLPT program can run for weeks or months. Ask the quote to separate scoping, active testing, quality review, reporting, remediation support, and retesting so a short testing window is not confused with complete delivery.

How often should penetration testing be performed?

Use risk and change frequency. High-value assets should be tested after material releases, architecture changes, identity redesigns, major cloud changes, or exposure shifts, in addition to any contractual or regulatory cadence. An annual test may support a stable system, while a fast-moving product may need release-triggered or continuous coverage. DORA TLPT cadence for designated entities is a separate regulatory requirement.

Conclusion

The Polish market offers strong specialist boutiques, industrial-security teams, network engineers, major consultancies, and international providers. The best choice is the team whose evidence, scope, testing depth, production controls, reporting, and retesting match the system and decision you need to protect.

Use the comparison to build a shortlist, then run the same technical scoping call and quote template with each provider. A well-defined penetration testing engagement is easier to compare, safer to execute, and more likely to produce findings your teams can actually fix.

Need a second opinion on scope? Ask DeepStrike for a technical scoping review and a proposal mapped to your assets, release model, and reporting requirements.

About the Author

Mohammed Khalil, CISSP, OSCP, and OSWE, is a Cybersecurity Architect at DeepStrike specializing in penetration testing, cloud security, application security, and offensive-security operations.