September 26, 2025
Updated: November 11, 2026
An evidence-checked comparison of local specialists, consultancies, and international providers serving Polish organizations in 2026.
Mohammed Khalil

Poland has a strong mix of specialist offensive-security firms, broader cyber consultancies, and international providers serving Polish organizations. The right choice depends on scope: application testing, cloud, red teaming, OT/ICS, or DORA-aligned TLPT. This 2026 comparison reviews 26 providers using current first-party evidence, separates genuine Polish offices from cross-border delivery, and explains how to compare proposals. DeepStrike is listed first because it publishes this guide; the ordering is editorial, not an independent certification. Buyers should verify the named test team, methodology, reporting, retesting, data handling, and availability before signing.
Comparing providers beyond Poland? Our worldwide list of penetration testing companies covers firms that deliver testing across regions.
For a broader comparison of cybersecurity providers beyond penetration testing, see Top Cybersecurity Companies in Poland. For the neighboring market, see our list of penetration testing companies in Ukraine.
Disclosure: DeepStrike publishes this list and lists itself first; list order is not a quality ranking. DeepStrike was assessed with the same public-evidence rubric as every other provider, but this is not an independent ranking. “Best for” labels describe editorial use-case fit, not a guarantee of engagement quality. Provider evidence was checked on November 1, 2026, and each provider’s distinguishing line was rechecked on its own website on November 3, 2026.
| Need | Providers to examine first | Why they fit the use case |
|---|---|---|
| Application, cloud, and infrastructure testing with remediation collaboration | DeepStrike | Human-led testing, Slack collaboration, and 12 months of remediation retesting on the published Basic plan |
| Specialist application and IAM testing | SecuRing, LogicalTrust, ISEC | Publicly documented application, identity, code, and adversary-simulation capabilities |
| DORA-aligned TLPT | AFINE, Securitum, CyberForces | Current public pages specifically describing TLPT services |
| OT/ICS environments | REDTEAM.PL, nFlo, SEQRED, SISOFT | Explicit industrial, OT, ICS, IoT, or vehicle-testing coverage |
| Testing plus incident response | REDTEAM.PL, Prevenity, CQURE | Offensive testing alongside DFIR, malware, or emergency-response capabilities |
| Large cross-border programs | Deloitte, EY, PwC, KPMG | Broader consulting capacity and multi-workstream delivery |
| Network and infrastructure engineering | EXATEL, Grandmetric, Nomios Poland | Testing embedded in wider network and security-engineering portfolios |
These are starting points, not automatic winners. A provider that is excellent for a Warsaw bank may be a poor fit for a two-week API release, and an application specialist may not be qualified to test a live industrial process safely.
Poland’s amended National Cybersecurity System Act, commonly discussed as the KSC implementation of NIS2, was published on March 2, 2026 and entered into force on April 3, 2026. It expands the population of key and important entities and raises expectations for documented cyber-risk management. The law does not make one generic penetration-test format mandatory for every organization, so scope should follow the entity’s systems, risks, and specific obligations.
For organizations that must self-register rather than being entered automatically, the Ministry of Digital Affairs opened registration on May 7, 2026 and states an application deadline of October 3, 2026. Registration and security implementation are different tasks: a pentest can produce technical evidence, but it does not replace governance, incident reporting, supplier controls, or an information-security management system.
The threat environment also changed. CERT Polska’s official 2025 report records 658,320 reports and 260,783 incidents, up 152% year over year. It classifies 253,238 incidents as computer fraud, representing 97% of handled incidents. Those categories are not a count of exploitable vulnerabilities, but the CERT Polska 2025 data supports a more frequent and risk-based testing program for exposed and high-value systems.
DORA has applied since January 17, 2025. It requires a digital operational resilience testing program across the financial sector, while threat-led penetration testing is reserved for selected financial entities and is generally required at least every three years under DORA Article 26. A standard application pentest and a regulator-aligned TLPT engagement are not interchangeable.
The detailed EU standards for TLPT are set out in Delegated Regulation (EU) 2025/1190. Buyers should ask whether a provider can support threat intelligence, scoped live-system testing, white-team governance, risk controls, evidence, and remediation closure rather than accepting a normal pentest relabeled as TLPT.
GDPR Article 32 requires a process for regularly testing, assessing, and evaluating the effectiveness of technical and organizational security measures. The regulation does not prescribe penetration testing by name, so the test type, frequency, and scope should be justified by risk, processing context, and the systems that protect personal data.
For banks, KNF Recommendation D is more specific: section 9.21 says penetration tests are among the tools that should be used systematically to assess controls in highly significant ICT environments. This is banking supervisory guidance, not a universal rule for every company operating in Poland.
Procurement, clearances, and data handling: public bodies buy testing under the Public Procurement Law, usually with Polish-language documentation and reports. Work that touches classified information requires personnel security clearances and, for companies, an industrial security certificate under the Act on the Protection of Classified Information, which is why several entries below state clearance levels. Incidents at in-scope entities are handled by the three national CSIRTs (CSIRT NASK, which operates CERT Polska; CSIRT GOV; and CSIRT MON), and personal data processed during a test falls under the GDPR, supervised in Poland by the President of the Personal Data Protection Office (UODO).
A company qualified for this comparison only when its current first-party website described a real penetration-testing or closely related offensive-security service. It also needed a Polish office or legal entity, a Poland-based team, or a credible cross-border delivery model for Polish organizations. Directory-only listings and tool resellers without a clearly documented human testing service were excluded.
The editorial rubric weights service evidence and technical depth at 30%, Poland delivery relevance at 20%, scope and specialization at 15%, reporting and remediation transparency at 15%, regulated-sector alignment at 10%, and public-evidence recency at 10%. The list does not score private proposals, undisclosed tester experience, or customer references that cannot be checked publicly.
The order is useful for discovery, but the final selection should happen at the engagement level. Ask who will actually perform the test, what percentage of effort is manual, which assets and roles are included, how production risk is controlled, and whether the same team handles retesting. If remediation requires additional engineering capacity, poland team augmentation can support fixes within an existing development team while the penetration-testing provider independently validates the results.
Do not start procurement with “we need a pentest.” Start with the decision the report must support.
| Requirement | Appropriate engagement | Evidence to request |
|---|---|---|
| Find exploitable flaws in a web product | Authenticated web application and API penetration test | Role matrix, API inventory, business-logic coverage, sample finding, retest terms |
| Assess an iOS or Android product | Mobile application test covering client, API, storage, and platform controls | Device and OS matrix, mobile methodology, backend scope, build requirements |
| Validate cloud exposure and privilege paths | Cloud configuration and attack-path assessment | Accounts/subscriptions, identity scope, provider authorization rules, logging plan |
| Test detection and response against realistic objectives | Red-team or purple-team exercise | Threat model, objective, rules of engagement, white-team plan, detection debrief |
| Meet a designated DORA requirement | Regulator-aligned TLPT | Control-team model, threat intelligence, live-system safeguards, evidence package |
| Test industrial or cyber-physical systems | OT/ICS assessment with safe testing plan | Architecture review, vendor constraints, maintenance window, safety stop conditions |
| Reduce the gap between releases and annual testing | Continuous or release-triggered testing | Trigger model, asset inventory, response times, retest workflow, reporting cadence |
For a product scope, a dedicated web application penetration test should include authenticated roles, APIs, authorization boundaries, business logic, and validated impact—not only an unauthenticated scanner output.
A mobile application penetration test should cover the app, the backend APIs it relies on, local storage, platform-specific controls, and relevant iOS or Android behavior.
For AWS, Azure, or Google Cloud, a cloud penetration test should define identity paths, tenant or account boundaries, allowed techniques, logging, and provider rules before testing starts.
AI-enabled products need scope beyond a conventional web test. An LLM and AI application assessment may need to cover model-facing inputs, tool use, authorization, data exposure, and abuse paths while keeping the engagement defensive and controlled.
Choose red teaming when the objective is to test whether people, processes, and controls can detect and contain a realistic adversary—not when the only requirement is a vulnerability list for one application.
| # | Provider | Poland delivery status | Publicly stated focus | Pricing visibility | Best fit |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | DeepStrike | Remote delivery; HQ Newark, Delaware; no Polish office | Human-led app, cloud, and infrastructure testing | Pricing page (no numeric price shown) plus custom scope | Engineering teams needing direct remediation collaboration |
| 2 | SecuRing | Kraków office | Web, mobile, IAM, infrastructure, cloud, red team | Quote | Deep specialist testing for complex enterprise scope |
| 3 | AFINE | Warsaw office | Manual pentesting, red team, TLPT, critical infrastructure | Quote | Finance, banking, and research-led offensive work |
| 4 | LogicalTrust | Wrocław office | App, cloud, container, code, red team, SCADA | Quote | Broad technical scope with application depth |
| 5 | Securitum | Kraków office | App, infrastructure, cloud, red team, DORA/TLPT | Published day-rate range and quote | Regulated organizations wanting documented methods |
| 6 | CyberForces | Wrocław office | Web, mobile, network, IoT, source code, red/blue team | Quote | Multi-scope programs and scalable delivery |
| 7 | Niebezpiecznik | Kraków office | App, network, social engineering, physical, training | Quote | Human-layer testing combined with education |
| 8 | REDTEAM.PL | Warsaw office | IT/OT/IoT/SCADA, red team, social engineering, DFIR | Quote | Offensive testing plus response capability |
| 9 | CQURE | Warsaw headquarters | Infrastructure, identity, pentesting, incident response, training | Quote | Windows and identity-heavy environments |
| 10 | Pentestica | Katowice office | Pentesting, IT audits, regulated-sector support | Published price ranges and quote | Organizations combining testing and compliance work |
| 11 | Prevenity | Warsaw office | App, infrastructure, source code, SCADA, IR, malware | Quote | Regulated and critical environments |
| 12 | ISEC | Warsaw office | Application, code, embedded, network, social engineering | Quote | Product and code-level security reviews |
| 13 | nFlo | Warsaw office | App, infrastructure, Wi-Fi, OT/ICS, SOC, GRC | Published prices and quote | Mixed IT and industrial environments |
| 14 | SEQRED | Warsaw office | OT/ICS/IoT, critical infrastructure, red team | Quote | Industrial and cyber-physical systems |
| 15 | EXATEL | Warsaw office | Network pentesting, security audits, managed SOC | Quote | Telecom, network, and critical infrastructure |
| 16 | Grandmetric | Poznań office | Network, infrastructure, app, white/gray/black box | Quote | Engineering-led infrastructure assessments |
| 17 | Nomios Poland | Warsaw office | Infrastructure, vulnerability, wireless, security integration | Quote | Enterprises wanting an integrator and tester |
| 18 | CYBERBLOCK | Warsaw office | Network, application, system audits, social engineering | Quote | SMB and mid-market technical assessments |
| 19 | Pentesters | Poznań office | Manual web, mobile, API, and infrastructure pentesting | Quote | Focused manual testing with agreed re-tests |
| 20 | VIPentest | Registered office in Prabuty | Applications, APIs, infrastructure, security audits | Quote | Flexible application and infrastructure scope |
| 21 | ChangePro | Poznań office | Manual app/API, wireless, segmentation, DDoS, social testing | Quote | Methodology-driven specialist engagements |
| 22 | SISOFT | Kraków office | Web, mobile, network, IoT/OT, vehicles, retesting | Quote | Industrial, automotive, and regulated testing |
| 23 | Deloitte Poland | Poland offices | DORA, cyber risk, resilience testing, enterprise advisory | Quote | Large transformation and regulated programs |
| 24 | EY Poland | Poland offices | App, source, network, cloud, red team, phishing, IT/OT | Quote | Large multi-domain testing programs |
| 25 | PwC Poland | Poland offices | Pentesting, configuration review, malware, IT/OT | Quote | Testing bundled with broader cyber advisory |
| 26 | KPMG Poland | Poland offices | IT system and application pentesting, red team, advisory | Quote | Enterprise governance and assurance programs |

Public offering: DeepStrike's penetration testing services describe human-led testing across applications, cloud environments, and infrastructure, supported by a findings and collaboration platform. Its public process covers planning, reconnaissance, vulnerability discovery, controlled exploitation, reporting, and technical support. Published reports include reproduction steps, remediation guidance, and root-cause information; the proposal should define exact coverage and commercial terms.
Poland relevance: Founded in 2016, DeepStrike LLC is headquartered in Newark, Delaware, has 11–50 employees, and also publishes a business address in Dubai, UAE (IFZA Business Park). It delivers testing remotely for Polish clients; define tester locations, permitted subcontracting, and data-handling restrictions in the engagement agreement.
Team certifications: OSCP, OSWE, OSEP, OSWP, GXPN, GWAPT, eCPPT, eMAPT, eWPT, CREST CPSA, CRTP, CRTE, and Microsoft Azure Security Engineer Associate, as shown on DeepStrike's services page.
Official sources: Pricing , Contact Us
Buyer fit: Engineering teams that need application, cloud, or infrastructure testing with direct remediation collaboration.
| Documented strengths | Limits and buying considerations |
|---|---|
| Human-led testing with reproduction evidence, root-cause information, and remediation guidance. | The service description is not an independently measured quality comparison. Assess the assigned team and a relevant sample report. |
| The published Basic plan lists Slack collaboration, customizable reports, and 12 months of remediation retesting. | No numeric price is displayed on the pricing page. Basic is a one-shot test; recurring coverage belongs to a different plan, with contract-specific terms. |
| Team certifications shown on the services page include OSCP, OSWE, OSEP, OSWP, GXPN, GWAPT, eCPPT, eMAPT, eWPT, CREST CPSA, CRTP, CRTE, and Microsoft Azure Security Engineer Associate. | These are individual tester credentials, not a company-level accreditation; ask which certified testers will be assigned to your engagement. |

Public offering: SecuRing offers web, mobile, and SaaS application testing, security code review, cloud testing (AWS, Azure, GCP), infrastructure, Active Directory and macOS environment testing, device and IoT testing, IAM and single sign-on testing, and AI red teaming. It also lists red teaming with social engineering and physical testing, insider-threat assessments, and targeted phishing. Its web testing process starts from business context and a threat model with application-specific test cases, relies mainly on manual testing aligned with OWASP standards, and ends with a report and a consultation to discuss findings and remediation.
Poland relevance: SecuRing's privacy policy lists its registered office at ul. Kalwaryjska 65/6, 30-504 Kraków, and the site states it has been doing security testing since 2003. No company accreditation such as ISO 27001 or CREST is stated on the pages reviewed, so confirm data-handling controls, tester locations, and any subcontracting in the agreement.
Official sources: https://www.securing.pl/en/services/; https://www.securing.pl/en/contact/
Best fit: Software and SaaS companies, including finance and fintech teams, that want testers working closely with their developers on application and cloud security.
What sets it apart in Poland: testing since 2003 from Kraków, with developer-facing application and cloud work and niche coverage such as macOS, single sign-on, and AI red teaming.
| Documented strengths | Limitations / what to confirm |
|---|---|
| Published web testing process covering business context, threat modelling, application-specific test cases, and a post-test consultation. | Retest terms are not set out on the service page (only mentioned in a case study); confirm them in the proposal. |
| Broad scope that includes IAM/SSO, macOS fleets, devices, and AI systems as well as standard web and infrastructure testing. | The site does not list company accreditations or team certifications; ask for tester CVs if a tender requires them. |

Public offering: AFINE offers manual penetration testing of web and mobile applications, payment and transaction APIs, cloud and internal infrastructure, desktop applications, and industrial IT/OT/SCADA environments, with sector pages for banking, fintech, healthcare, and critical infrastructure. It also lists red teaming and DORA threat-led penetration testing (TLPT). Reports include technical detail for security teams, proof-of-concept exploits and fix guidance for developers, and a business impact view for leadership.
Poland relevance: AFINE lists its main office at Al. Jerozolimskie 146C, 02-305 Warszawa, and states it is ISO 27001 certified and carries professional liability insurance. Confirm which researchers will be assigned and define data handling and any subcontracting in the agreement.
Certifications: AFINE's site states that every team member holds at least OSCP or eWPTX certification, and that researchers also hold certifications such as OSCE, OSWE, OSEP, and CRTO.
Official sources: https://afine.com/penetration-testing; https://afine.com/contact
Best fit: Banks, fintechs, and other regulated enterprises that need manual testing of complex financial systems or DORA TLPT engagements.
What sets it apart in Poland: it publishes a specific DORA TLPT offering and states that every team member holds at least OSCP or eWPTX, which matters for Polish banks selected for TLPT.
| Documented strengths | Limitations / what to confirm |
|---|---|
| States ISO 27001 certification and professional liability insurance, and describes a permanent, certified team. | Content is organised around banking and other regulated sectors; smaller organisations should confirm the engagement scope fits their needs. |
| Reports combine proof-of-concept exploits, developer fix guidance, and business impact for leadership; the team also created the DASVS desktop application testing standard. | Retest terms are not described on the pages reviewed; confirm them in the proposal. |

Public offering: LogicalTrust offers penetration testing of web and mobile applications (Android and iOS), network and infrastructure security audits including PCI DSS, IoT, SCADA, DORA, and NIS2 scopes, cloud configuration testing (AWS, Azure, Google Cloud), and Kubernetes, OpenShift, and Docker testing. It also lists source code audits, ransomware attack simulation, Red Team vs Blue Team exercises, and social engineering tests. Tests follow OWASP, ASVS, MASVS, OSSTMM, and NIST methodologies after scope, time, and permitted actions are agreed, and a sample penetration test report can be downloaded from the site.
Poland relevance: LogicalTrust lists its office at ul. Stanisławowska 47, 54-611 Wrocław (LogicalTrust Services sp. z o.o.). No company accreditation such as ISO 27001 is stated on the pages reviewed; define tester locations, subcontracting, and data handling in the agreement.
Certifications: LogicalTrust's site lists team cybersecurity certifications including OSCP, OSCP+, OSWE, OSCE, CRTP, CRTE, CRTO, Burp Suite Certified Practitioner, eMAPT, eWPTX, and eCPPT.
Official sources: https://logicaltrust.net/en/penetration_tests_www_mobile.html; https://logicaltrust.net/en/
Best fit: Organisations that need application, infrastructure, or compliance-driven testing (PCI DSS, DORA, NIS2) from a Wrocław-based team, and that want to see a sample report before buying.
What sets it apart in Poland: a Wrocław team that lists PCI DSS, DORA, and NIS2 scopes plus Kubernetes, OpenShift, and Docker testing.
| Documented strengths | Limitations / what to confirm |
|---|---|
| Named methodologies (OWASP, ASVS, MASVS, OSSTMM, NIST) and a downloadable sample penetration test report. | Retest terms and report structure are not described on the service page; confirm them in the proposal. |
| Scope covers containers, cloud configuration, ransomware simulation, and compliance audits alongside application testing. | Mobile platform coverage is described in general terms; confirm the iOS and Android versions in scope. |

Public offering: Securitum offers security audits of web applications, mobile applications (Android/iOS, including backend), e-commerce platforms, source code, LAN, WiFi, and external network devices, plus DDoS resilience testing, social engineering (phishing) tests, and post-breach analysis. Its web application audit is run black-box with manual and automated attacks and lists sample scope items such as SQL injection, XSS, CSRF, authentication and session management, authorisation bypass, and web server and SSL configuration. The site publishes a real sample audit report released with the system owner's consent. Its English-language site (securitum.com) also describes DORA services, including threat-led penetration testing (TLPT), and red teaming.
Poland relevance: Securitum lists its audit company, Securitum Audyty Sp. z o.o., at ul. Siostry Zygmunty Zimmer 5, 30-441 Kraków, and states it has been providing penetration testing services since 2009. No company accreditation such as ISO 27001 is stated; define tester locations, subcontracting, and data handling in the agreement.
Certifications: Securitum's site states its audit team includes auditors holding CISSP and OSCP certifications.
Official sources: https://securitum.pl/audyty/; https://securitum.com/digital_operational_resilience_act_dora.html; https://securitum.pl/kontakt/
Best fit: Polish organisations, including banks and public sector bodies, that want a long-established Polish-language audit provider with a published sample report.
What sets it apart in Poland: a long-established Polish audit provider (testing since 2009) with Polish-language audit documentation, a published sample report, and a TLPT offering.
| Documented strengths | Limitations / what to confirm |
|---|---|
| Published sample audit report and detailed sample scope for web application tests. | Polish-language service pages are more detailed than the English site; international buyers should confirm English-language reporting. |
| Wide catalogue including DDoS resilience, WiFi, e-commerce, and post-breach analysis. | The web audit page describes black-box testing; confirm whether grey-box or white-box testing and retests are available for your scope. |

Public offering: CyberForces offers penetration testing of web and mobile applications, IoT devices, and network infrastructure, plus vulnerability scans, source code review, and AI solution testing. It also lists red teaming, social engineering (phishing, smishing, vishing, physical entry), OSINT, and TLPT-based resilience testing. Testing follows the OWASP Testing Guide for web and mobile and PTES for infrastructure; critical findings are reported immediately, the report has a management summary and detailed technical guidance with reproduction steps, and retests are scheduled with the client.
Poland relevance: CyberForces is the cybersecurity brand of TestArmy Group S.A., which lists its office at ul. Petuniowa 9/5, 53-238 Wrocław. The site states the team holds security clearances; confirm which entity signs the contract and define tester locations, subcontracting, and data handling in the agreement.
Certifications: CyberForces' site lists specialist certifications including OSCP, OSWE, OSCE, OSED, OSWP, CEH, CISSP, CISA, CISM, GXPN, eWPTX, eMAPT, and Burp Suite certification.
Official sources: https://cyberforces.com/testy-penetracyjne; https://cyberforces.com/kontakt
Best fit: Polish companies that want penetration testing alongside ISO, NIS2, or DORA compliance work and staff training from one provider.
What sets it apart in Poland: part of TestArmy Group S.A., it pairs testing with security-cleared staff and ISO, NIS2, and DORA compliance work.
| Documented strengths | Limitations / what to confirm |
|---|---|
| Documented engagement path: NDA, pre-analysis, tester IP addresses shared in advance, immediate reporting of critical issues, two-part report, and scheduled retests. | The brand also sells training and compliance services; confirm the dedicated testing team and its experience for your scope. |
| Named standards (OWASP Testing Guide, PTES) and coverage of IoT and AI systems. | Contracts are with TestArmy Group S.A.; check entity details and terms in the agreement. |

Public offering: Niebezpiecznik offers penetration testing of web and mobile applications and of networks and computer systems, social engineering and phishing simulations, physical intrusion attempts, and other red teaming activities. It also lists system hardening, review of security procedures, security audits, post-breach analysis, and disaster recovery support. Each engagement is scoped after a free pre-analysis and a client questionnaire before an offer is made.
Poland relevance: Niebezpiecznik lists its office at ul. Kołowa 5, krypta 59, 30-134 Kraków, and describes itself as a company of a dozen or so people that also runs a security news site and training. No company accreditation is stated; define tester locations, subcontracting, and data handling in the agreement.
Official sources: https://niebezpiecznik.pl/testy-penetracyjne/; https://niebezpiecznik.pl/kontakt/
Best fit: Polish organisations that want penetration testing, social engineering, and security awareness training from a single Kraków team.
What sets it apart in Poland: a Kraków team that also runs a Polish security news site and training, strongest where social engineering and physical intrusion tests are in scope.
| Documented strengths | Limitations / what to confirm |
|---|---|
| Scope includes physical intrusion attempts and social engineering alongside application and network testing. | The service page gives no methodology, report contents, or retest terms; request them during scoping. |
| Engagements are tailored after a free pre-analysis and questionnaire. | The company also runs a security news site and training business; confirm the size and availability of the testing team. |

Public offering: REDTEAM.PL offers internal and external infrastructure penetration testing (LAN/WAN/WLAN, Active Directory), web, mobile, and client-server application reviews, and IT/OT/IoT/SCADA testing in black-box, grey-box, and white-box models. It also lists red teaming and social engineering, security and cloud audits, threat hunting, digital forensics and incident response, and smart contract audits. Testing follows NIST SP 800-115 and PTES, can meet PCI DSS penetration testing guidance, and reports are written by consultants rather than generated by scanners.
Poland relevance: REDTEAM.PL lists its office at Chmielna 2/31, 00-020 Warszawa (RED TEAM Sp. z o.o.), and states it has held Polish court-appointed IT expert witness status. No company accreditation such as ISO 27001 is stated; define tester locations, subcontracting, and data handling in the agreement.
Certifications: REDTEAM.PL's site lists team certifications including OSCP (entire pentest team), OSWP, OSCE, GXPN, eWPT, eWPTX, eMAPT, CEH, CISSP, and CISA.
Official sources: https://redteam.pl/en/penetration-testing.html; https://redteam.pl/en/
Best fit: Organisations that want senior-only testers with forensics and incident response experience, including financial and critical infrastructure clients.
What sets it apart in Poland: a Warsaw team that combines offensive testing with forensics and incident response and states Polish court-appointed IT expert witness experience.
| Documented strengths | Limitations / what to confirm |
|---|---|
| Named methodologies (NIST SP 800-115, PTES), PCI DSS testing guidance, and hand-written reports. | Retest terms are not described on the service page; confirm them in the proposal. |
| States all engagements are staffed by experienced consultants, with published vulnerability research and ENISA handbook contributions. | A senior-only team may have limited capacity for large or short-notice engagements; confirm scheduling early. |

Public offering: CQURE offers internal grey-box penetration testing focused on Windows infrastructure and Active Directory, external black-box testing (reconnaissance, scanning, gaining access), and web application penetration testing in black-box, grey-box, or white-box models. It also lists red teaming, Office 365 and Azure AD configuration reviews, phishing simulations, and incident response and forensics. The site states clients receive ongoing information about identified vulnerabilities during testing, and red team engagements end with a report of vulnerabilities and recommendations.
Poland relevance: CQURE states its headquarters is in central Warsaw, and its privacy policy names Shelf Cqure Sp. z o.o. with a registered office at Rondo Daszyńskiego 1, Warszawa; it also lists branches in New York, Dubai, and Switzerland. No company accreditation such as ISO 27001 is stated; confirm which entity and office will deliver the work and define data handling and subcontracting in the agreement.
Official sources: https://cqure.pl/services/; https://cqure.pl/contact/
Best fit: Organisations with Microsoft-centric environments that want Active Directory, Windows, and Microsoft 365 security testing alongside incident response capability.
What sets it apart in Poland: a Microsoft and Active Directory specialist, useful where identity and Windows infrastructure are the main attack path.
| Documented strengths | Limitations / what to confirm |
|---|---|
| Detailed descriptions of internal grey-box, external black-box, and web application test phases, with a Microsoft and Active Directory focus. | Report contents and retest terms for penetration tests are not described; confirm them in the proposal. |
| Combines testing with incident response, forensics, and an in-house research lab. | The contracting entity named in the privacy policy (Shelf Cqure Sp. z o.o.) differs from the brand name; verify entity details before signing. |

Public offering: Pentestica offers penetration testing of networks and infrastructure, web applications, mobile applications (iOS, Android), REST and GraphQL APIs, servers, databases and Active Directory, IoT and OT/SCADA devices, and social engineering including physical entry tests. It describes a seven-stage process from scoping and NDA through reconnaissance, scanning, manual verification and controlled exploitation to reporting, with black-, grey- and white-box variants, and works to OWASP WSTG, ASVS, MASVS/MASTG, PTES and NIST SP 800-115. Reports include an executive summary, CVSS-rated findings with proof of concept, and prioritised recommendations, and a retest after fixes can be ordered as a separate stage. It also lists red teaming, TLPT under DORA, IT audits, NIS2 and vCISO services.
Poland relevance: Pentestica is operated by Remote Admin Sp. z o.o., which lists its address as ul. Chorzowska 150, 40-101 Katowice. Confirm which legal entity signs the contract and who will test, and define subcontracting and data handling in the agreement.
Certifications: Pentestica's site lists team certifications including OSCP, OSCE, CEH, CISA, CISM, CRISC and ISO/IEC 27001 Lead Auditor.
Official sources: https://pentestica.pl/testy-penetracyjne/; https://pentestica.pl/kontakt/
Best fit: Polish SMEs, public bodies and fintechs that want a clearly scoped test with named methodologies and an optional, separately ordered retest.
What sets it apart in Poland: a Katowice provider that lists REST and GraphQL APIs, OT/SCADA, and physical entry tests, and also lists TLPT.
| Documented strengths | Limitations / what to confirm |
|---|---|
| Detailed public description of test types, the seven-stage process, black/grey/white-box options and report contents. | The brand is run by Remote Admin Sp. z o.o.; confirm the contracting entity and the individual testers assigned. |
| Covers regulatory testing needs including DORA TLPT, NIS2 and red teaming alongside standard pentests. | Retest is an optional extra rather than included by default; agree its scope and timing in the proposal. |

Public offering: Prevenity offers security audits and penetration testing of web applications, mobile applications and IT infrastructure, plus source code audits and compliance audits against security standards and regulations. Its methodology draws on ISO/IEC 27001, NIST guidelines, OWASP and CIS alongside internal methodologies, and example projects include electronic and mobile banking, payment and POS systems, APIs, SWIFT, OpenAPI interfaces and SCADA environments. It also lists advisory and hardening work, incident response and digital forensics, and malware analysis.
Poland relevance: Prevenity lists its office at ul. Grzybowska 87, 00-844 Warszawa, and states it holds an industrial security clearance (EU/NATO/ESA). Confirm the testing team and report format in the proposal, and define data handling and any subcontracting in the agreement.
Certifications: Prevenity's site lists team certifications including OSCP, OSCE, OSWE, CEH, CISSP, CISM, CISA, CRISC and ISO/IEC 27001 Lead Auditor.
Official sources: https://www.prevenity.com/en/services/index.html; https://www.prevenity.com/en/contact/index.html
Best fit: Banks, insurers and other regulated financial-sector organisations that need testing of banking, payment and SWIFT-related systems with KNF-oriented compliance work.
What sets it apart in Poland: a Warsaw provider with an industrial security clearance (EU/NATO/ESA) and a financial-sector focus that includes payment and SWIFT-related systems.
| Documented strengths | Limitations / what to confirm |
|---|---|
| Documented project experience in banking channels, mobile payments, SWIFT and KNF recommendation compliance. | The services page does not describe report contents or retest terms; request a sample report and retest conditions. |
| Combines testing with incident response, digital forensics and malware analysis under one provider. | Also resells security tools (OpenText Fortify, Rapid7); confirm that tool choices in the engagement are independent of resale. |

Public offering: ISEC offers penetration tests of web and mobile applications (iOS, Android), network devices and services, operating systems, thick-client software and embedded systems, verifying business logic and security mechanisms such as access control as well as compliance with client security requirements. It also lists white-box source code analysis (C, C++, Objective-C, PHP, Java, Python, Perl) including backdoor discovery, vulnerability assessments with false-positive filtering, social-engineering simulations, project security support, and research and development.
Poland relevance: ISEC Sp. z o.o. lists its office at ul. Poznańska 13/3, 00-680 Warszawa. The site publishes no certifications or methodology detail, so request tester credentials, a sample report and retest terms, and define data handling in the agreement.
Official sources: https://isec.pl/
Best fit: Organisations that need deep technical testing or source code review of applications, embedded systems and thick clients.
What sets it apart in Poland: deep technical scope across thick clients, embedded systems, network devices, and source code.
| Documented strengths | Limitations / what to confirm |
|---|---|
| Covers less common targets including embedded systems, thick clients and white-box code review for backdoors. | The one-page site gives no detail on methodology, report contents or retest; confirm these in the proposal. |
| Business logic and access-control verification is stated as part of penetration tests. | No team or company certifications are listed on the site; ask for tester qualifications. |

Public offering: nFlo offers external and internal network penetration tests, web application tests against OWASP risks, mobile application tests (static and dynamic analysis), API tests, cloud tests, and specialist testing of OT/ICS and medical systems. It works to OWASP WSTG, PTES or NIST SP 800-115 and states that reports include CVSS 3.1 risk ratings, a proof of concept for each finding, business-risk prioritisation, remediation steps and an executive summary, delivered within five working days. Retest after fixes is stated as included in web application test packages and optional for other tests.
Poland relevance: nFlo Sp. z o.o. lists its office at ul. Ząbkowska 31, 03-736 Warszawa, and states it holds ISO 27001 certification. Confirm which team performs the test, as the company also provides IT infrastructure and vendor partnership services, and define subcontracting and data handling in the agreement.
Certifications: nFlo's site lists ISO 27001 for the company and team certifications including CISSP, CISM, CEH and OSCP, and its pentest page also mentions GPEN.
Official sources: https://nflo.pl/uslugi/testy-penetracyjne/; https://nflo.pl/kontakt/
Best fit: Mid-sized Polish companies that want pentesting bundled with wider IT, cloud, SOC and NIS2 compliance services from one supplier.
What sets it apart in Poland: covers OT/ICS and medical systems testing alongside IT, cloud, SOC, and NIS2 services from an ISO 27001-certified Warsaw company.
| Documented strengths | Limitations / what to confirm |
|---|---|
| Published report contents (CVSS 3.1, PoC per finding, executive summary) and a stated five-working-day reporting time. | Retest is included only for web application packages; agree retest terms for other test types. |
| Scope extends to OT/ICS and medical systems as well as standard IT targets. | The company is also a reseller and partner of many technology vendors; confirm that testing is independent of products it supplies. |

Public offering: SEQRED offers penetration tests that identify vulnerabilities in IT and OT infrastructure and systems, with a report rating each finding for criticality using recognised methodologies and proposing remediation actions. It also lists full red team operations combining OSINT, network penetration, physical access attempts and social engineering, as well as code security audits, CBOM analysis of third-party software components and firmware, cloud configuration reviews, OT security audits and KSC compliance audits.
Poland relevance: SEQRED International Sp. z o.o. lists its office at ul. Rzymowskiego 34, 02-697 Warszawa. The site does not list company accreditations, so confirm tester qualifications and retest terms, and define data handling and subcontracting in the agreement.
Official sources: https://seqred.pl/testy-penetracyjne/; https://seqred.pl/kontakt/
Best fit: Industrial and critical-infrastructure operators that need testing across both IT and OT environments.
What sets it apart in Poland: an OT and ICS specialist that also runs full red team operations across IT and OT, a fit for industrial operators newly in scope of the amended KSC Act.
| Documented strengths | Limitations / what to confirm |
|---|---|
| Specialisation in OT and industrial systems; the company states it has submitted 12 CVE reports covering automation, network equipment and OT protocol implementations. | The pentest service page is brief, with no named methodology or report sample; request these before contracting. |
| Offers red team operations including physical and social-engineering vectors. | Retest after remediation is not described; confirm whether it is included. |

Public offering: EXATEL offers penetration tests run as controlled attacks on ICT systems in black-box, grey-box or white-box variants, looking for misconfigurations, software and hardware flaws, weaknesses in technical and procedural safeguards, and insufficient user awareness. It states that results from automated scanners are always manually verified by attempting exploitation and providing evidence of a realistic attack. Its cybersecurity portfolio also includes security audits, security reconnaissance, phishing campaigns, a SOC, anti-DDoS protection and managed firewalls.
Poland relevance: EXATEL S.A. lists its address at ul. Perkuna 47, 04-164 Warszawa, and states it holds ISO 27001 and ISO 22301 certification and a first-degree industrial security certificate covering Polish 'Ściśle Tajne', NATO Secret and EU Secret. Confirm the testing team, report contents and retest terms in the proposal, and define data handling in the agreement.
Certifications: EXATEL's pentest page states the company holds ISO 27001 and ISO 22301 certification and an industrial security certificate at NATO Secret and EU Secret level.
Official sources: https://exatel.pl/uslugi/cyberbezpieczenstwo/testy-penetracyjne-sieci/; https://exatel.pl/kontakt/
Best fit: Public-sector bodies and large enterprises that need a telecoms-scale provider with classified-information clearance.
What sets it apart in Poland: a telecoms operator with a first-degree industrial security certificate covering Polish 'Ściśle Tajne', NATO Secret, and EU Secret information, relevant for classified public-sector work.
| Documented strengths | Limitations / what to confirm |
|---|---|
| Stated manual verification of scanner results with evidence of exploitability. | The service page does not describe report contents, methodology or retest; request a sample report. |
| Holds ISO 27001, ISO 22301 and NATO/EU Secret industrial security clearance. | Pentesting is one service within a large telecoms operator; confirm the dedicated team and lead times. |

Public offering: Grandmetric offers penetration testing of ICT infrastructure, networks, applications and websites in white-box, black-box and grey-box models, often as part of a wider IT systems and infrastructure security audit. Its process covers scoping and Q&A with IT managers, reconnaissance, scanning, data collection and exploitation of detected vulnerabilities, followed by a report review meeting, advisory support for remediation and optional re-testing. Reports include an executive summary, technical description, vulnerabilities classified high, medium or low, proof of concept with console dumps or screenshots, and recommendations per vulnerability.
Poland relevance: Grandmetric Sp. z o.o. lists its office at ul. Metalowa 5, 60-118 Poznań, with further entities in the UK and US. Confirm which entity contracts and where testers are based, and define subcontracting and data handling in the agreement.
Official sources: https://www.grandmetric.com/services/network-data-and-systems-security/professional-penetration-testing/; https://www.grandmetric.com/contact-grandmetric/
Best fit: Organisations already working with a network integrator that want infrastructure-focused pentesting tied to remediation support.
What sets it apart in Poland: a Poznań network design and integration firm whose infrastructure pentests include advisory support for implementing the recommendations.
| Documented strengths | Limitations / what to confirm |
|---|---|
| Report contents are published in detail, including proof of concept per finding and a review meeting with remediation advice. | Primarily a network and infrastructure integrator; confirm the depth of application testing for complex web or mobile apps. |
| The related audit page names methodologies including NIST SP 800-115, OWASP, OWASP MASVS, OSSTMM, ISSAF and CVSS. | No team certifications are listed; request tester qualifications and note that re-testing is optional. |

Public offering: Nomios Poland lists vulnerability assessments and penetration testing within its cybersecurity assessment services, alongside cybersecurity analysis, breach assessment, wireless security assessment and policy and procedure development, covering internal and external assessments of infrastructure, applications and operations. Its knowledge base describes black-box and white-box approaches and a phased pentest process from reconnaissance to reporting. The Polish site gives no service-specific detail on methodology, report contents or retest.
Poland relevance: Nomios Poland lists its office at ul. Puławska 537, 02-844 Warszawa, and states it holds ISO 27001, ISO 22301, ISO 9001, ISO 14001 and ISO 27035-1 certificates and a third-degree industrial security certificate covering national, EU, NATO and ESA classified information. Confirm whether testing is performed by the Polish team or another group company, and define subcontracting and data handling in the agreement.
Certifications: Nomios Poland's site states it holds ISO 27001, ISO 22301, ISO 9001, ISO 14001 and ISO 27035-1 certificates, Trusted Introducer accreditation and an industrial security certificate.
Official sources: https://www.nomios.pl/profesjonalne-uslugi/ocena-cyberbezpieczenstwa/; https://www.nomios.pl/kontakt/
Best fit: Enterprises already using Nomios for network, firewall or managed security services that want assessments from the same provider.
What sets it apart in Poland: it states Trusted Introducer accreditation and a third-degree industrial security certificate, and suits enterprises already running Nomios network or managed security services.
| Documented strengths | Limitations / what to confirm |
|---|---|
| Company-level ISO certifications and industrial security clearance for classified national, EU, NATO and ESA work. | Pentesting is one line in a broad integration and managed-services portfolio; request detail on methodology, report and retest. |
| Part of the pan-European Nomios group, whose site also links the group brands Intragen and Dionach. | Confirm which group entity and which country's team will perform the test. |

Public offering: CYBERBLOCK offers penetration tests of networks, applications, information and IT systems run as controlled attacks to a pre-agreed scenario, covering scoping, passive and active reconnaissance, optional social engineering such as malicious e-mails, and exploitation of known vulnerabilities from the WAN and/or LAN side. It names tools including Nexpose/InsightVM, OpenVAS, Metasploit Pro, Acunetix, Nmap, SET and OWASP ZAP. Reports describe the most significant vulnerabilities and possible attacks, summarise the work performed and recommend countermeasures, and the company also offers security and compliance audits.
Poland relevance: CYBERBLOCK lists its office at ul. Kraszewskiego 15, 02-415 Warszawa. The site lists no company accreditations, so confirm tester qualifications, methodology and retest terms, and define data handling in the agreement.
Official sources: https://cyberblock.pl/oferta/testy-penetracyjne-i-audyt-bezpieczenstwa/; https://cyberblock.pl/kontakt/
Best fit: Small and mid-sized Polish businesses that want network pentesting combined with GDPR, NIS2 and security audit support.
What sets it apart in Poland: a Warsaw firm that combines network pentesting with GDPR, NIS2, and security audit support.
| Documented strengths | Limitations / what to confirm |
|---|---|
| Step-by-step description of the test process and named tooling. | The site names tools but not a recognised testing methodology; ask which standard the test follows. |
| Team page describes forensic, security-clearance and CEH training backgrounds and experience with state institutions. | Retest is not mentioned and news updates on the site appear dated; confirm current capacity and retest terms. |

Public offering: Pentesters offers manual penetration testing of web and mobile (Android and iOS) applications, APIs and integrations, and infrastructure, covering internet-facing services, internal networks and segmentation, access rights, and configuration, and states it also tests non-standard systems. It references OWASP ASVS and OWASP WSTG for application testing and chooses black-, grey- or white-box models per engagement. Reports include confirmed findings with reproduction steps, impact and possible attack paths, risk ratings and priorities, recommendations for the technical team, and a management summary, followed by a debrief and re-tests on terms agreed in advance.
Poland relevance: Pentesters lists its office at ul. Święty Marcin 29/8, 61-806 Poznań, and states it has worked in IT security since 2007. Confirm who will perform the testing, and define re-test scope, data handling, and any subcontracting in the agreement.
Official sources: https://www.pentesters.pl/; https://www.pentesters.pl/kontakt/
Best fit: Organisations in Poland that need focused manual testing of web, mobile, API, or network targets with a clear remediation report.
What sets it apart in Poland: a Poznań boutique working in IT security since 2007 that focuses on manual testing, including non-standard systems.
| Documented strengths | Limitations / what to confirm |
|---|---|
| Report contents are spelled out in detail, including reproduction steps, attack paths, risk priorities, and a management summary. | No team or company certifications are listed on the site; ask for tester qualifications in the proposal. |
| Pre-test scoping covers environment, roles, access, permitted scenarios, and production-testing safeguards. | Re-test conditions are agreed per project rather than fixed; confirm the number and window of re-tests. |

Public offering: VIPentest offers manual penetration testing of web applications and APIs (black-box and grey-box, following PTES and OWASP WSTG, ASVS, and API Security Top 10), mobile applications, and infrastructure, plus LLM application testing, social engineering, red team operations mapped to MITRE ATT&CK, and TLPT for the financial sector (DORA / TIBER-EU). It also offers an operator-led autonomous 'agentic AI' pentest service. Reports include vulnerability descriptions with proof-of-concept evidence, CVSS ratings, impact analysis, and remediation guidance; the site states a retest within 30 days of the report is included and that reports can be prepared in Polish or English.
Poland relevance: VIPentest sp. z o.o. publishes its registered address as Gonty 21, 82-550 Prabuty, with Polish and UK phone numbers, and states all testers hold at least OSCP. Confirm where the testing team is based, whether any work is automated or subcontracted, and how data is handled in the agreement.
Certifications: VIPentest's site states all testers hold at least OSCP and lists founder certifications including OSEP, OSCP, OSWE, OSWP, eWPTXv2, BSCP, eMAPT, and ISO 27001 Lead Auditor.
Official sources: https://vipentest.com/testy-penetracyjne/; https://vipentest.com/kontakt/
Best fit: Small and mid-sized organisations, including fintechs, that want application-focused testing with PoC-backed reports and an included retest.
What sets it apart in Poland: it states that all testers hold at least OSCP, covers LLM application testing and ATT&CK-mapped red teaming, and includes a retest.
| Documented strengths | Limitations / what to confirm |
|---|---|
| Methodologies (PTES, OWASP WSTG, ASVS, API Security Top 10) and report contents are named for each test type. | Only the founder is named publicly; ask for team size and references relevant to your sector. |
| Covers TLPT under DORA / TIBER-EU, red teaming, and LLM application testing alongside standard pentests. | Volume and speed figures (1000+ pentests, first findings within 24 hours) are self-reported; agree scope and timelines in the contract. |

Public offering: ChangePro offers manual penetration testing supported by specialist tools in white-, grey- and black-box models, covering networks, systems, web, mobile and desktop applications, back-end APIs, wireless networks and segmentation, configuration audits of servers, databases and operating systems, and access-rights separation. It also lists in-depth tests that can include social engineering, DDoS-resilience tests, and fuzz testing. The site names ISO 27000, PCI DSS, OSSTMM, ISSAF, and NIST among the standards it follows; report contents and retests are not described.
Poland relevance: ChangePro sp. z o.o. lists its office at ul. Strzeszyńska 35/37, 60-479 Poznań. Ask for a sample report and tester qualifications, and define retest terms, data handling, and any subcontracting in the agreement.
Official sources: https://changepro.pl/pentesty; https://changepro.pl/kontakt
Best fit: Organisations that want penetration testing bundled with compliance audits (KSC, NIS2, DORA, ISO 27001) and security awareness tooling from one supplier.
What sets it apart in Poland: a Poznań provider that bundles manual testing with KSC, NIS2, DORA, and ISO 27001 audits and awareness tooling.
| Documented strengths | Limitations / what to confirm |
|---|---|
| Broad scope list, from application attack classes to wireless, segmentation, configuration audits, and DDoS-resilience testing. | Report format and retest terms are not described on the site; request a sample report and retest terms. |
| Also offers compliance audits and resells awareness and security products (KnowBe4, MDM, HackingDept training lab). | Testers and their certifications are not named on the site; confirm who will perform the work. |
Public offering: SISOFT offers penetration testing of web and mobile applications, network infrastructure, IoT/OT devices, and vehicles, using threat modelling based on attacker tactics, techniques and procedures (TTP). Projects run 5-21 working days and include a kick-off, testing, a preliminary report, a findings workshop, a final consolidated report with recommendations, and a re-test of up to 2 working days included in the project.
Poland relevance: SISOFT lists its office at ul. Turystyczna 2, 31-213 Kraków, states it was founded in 2006, and states it holds ISO/IEC 27001 and ISO 9001 certification. Confirm the contracting entity and testing team, and define data handling and subcontracting in the agreement.
Certifications: SISOFT's site states its testers hold OSCP, OSWE, and CEH, and lists team certifications including CISSP, CRISC, ISO/IEC 27001 Lead Auditor, and ISO 22301 Lead Auditor.
Official sources: https://www.sisoft.pl/oferta/testy-penetracyjne; https://www.sisoft.pl/kontakt
Best fit: Mid-sized and regulated organisations, including automotive suppliers, that want a fixed project structure with an included re-test.
What sets it apart in Poland: a Kraków firm founded in 2006 that tests vehicles and IoT/OT devices as well as applications, within a fixed 5 to 21 working-day project structure.
| Documented strengths | Limitations / what to confirm |
|---|---|
| Published project timeline with stage durations, a findings workshop, and an included re-test. | Testing standards such as OWASP or PTES are not named on the page; confirm the methodology in the proposal. |
| Scope extends to IoT/OT and vehicle testing, alongside TISAX and ISO 27001 consulting. | The site refers to both SISOFT s.c. and SISOFT Sp. z o.o.; confirm the contracting legal entity. |

Public offering: Deloitte Poland's DORA page lists resilience testing for financial-sector entities, including vulnerability scanning, penetration testing, and business continuity testing, alongside support with ICT risk management, incident reporting, and threat information sharing. Its Polish cyber risk page also lists attack surface management, technology resilience, application security, cloud and OT security, SOC services, and crisis and incident response. The Polish pages do not describe pentest methodology, report contents, or retests.
Poland relevance: Deloitte lists its Warsaw office at al. Jana Pawła II 22, 00-133 Warszawa. Confirm which local team will perform testing, whether staff from other Deloitte member firms are involved, and define data handling in the agreement.
Official sources: https://www.deloitte.com/pl/pl/Industries/financial-services/about/DORA-rozporzadzenie-w-sprawie-operacyjnej-odpornosci-cyfrowej-sektora-finansowego.html; https://www.deloitte.com/pl/pl/offices/nasze-biura/biuro-warszawa.html
Best fit: Financial institutions that want DORA resilience testing combined with wider regulatory, risk, and SOC advisory from one firm.
What sets it apart in Poland: it positions resilience testing inside its DORA programme for financial-sector entities, alongside ICT risk management and incident reporting support.
| Documented strengths | Limitations / what to confirm |
|---|---|
| Testing is positioned within a broader DORA programme covering ICT risk, incident reporting, and threat information sharing. | No dedicated penetration testing page exists on the Polish site; request a written scope, methodology, and sample report. |
| Cyber practice also covers SOC build and operation, incident response, and OT security. | Large-firm engagements may involve several teams or member firms; confirm tester identity and location. |

Public offering: EY Poland's cybersecurity testing page lists penetration testing of web applications and software interfaces, source code review (SAST), network vulnerability and penetration testing, threat intelligence, red teaming, network traffic analysis, cloud security testing, social engineering (e.g. phishing), physical security testing, configuration benchmarking, malware analysis, threat modelling, and DDoS-resilience testing across IT and OT. It also offers security testing programme design and management and assessment of testing services delivered by third parties. Report contents and retests are not described on the page.
Poland relevance: EY lists its Warsaw office at Rondo ONZ 1, 00-124 Warszawa. Confirm which team will test and its location, and define data handling and any involvement of other EY member firms in the agreement.
Official sources: https://www.ey.com/pl_pl/services/cybersecurity/cybersecurity-testing
Best fit: Large organisations that need a broad testing programme, including red teaming, physical and OT testing, or oversight of other testing providers.
What sets it apart in Poland: a broad programme from SAST and red teaming to network traffic analysis, cloud, and social engineering, with the option to oversee other testing providers.
| Documented strengths | Limitations / what to confirm |
|---|---|
| Wide test catalogue covering IT and OT, including red teaming, physical security, and DDoS-resilience testing. | Methodology, report contents, and retest terms are not published; request them in the proposal. |
| Offers programme-level services such as designing a testing programme and assessing third-party testers. | No tester certifications are listed on the page; ask for named team qualifications. |

Public offering: PwC Poland's cybersecurity page states it runs penetration tests and configuration reviews of IT systems, alongside security training and malware analysis, and security audits of industrial automation (OT). Its Polish NIS page lists penetration testing of local and wireless networks, applications, databases, and operating systems, controlled social engineering, and assessment of response to attacks, and its OT page lists penetration testing of smart metering (AMI) networks. Methodology, report contents, and retests are not described on these pages.
Poland relevance: PwC lists its Warsaw office at ul. Polna 11, 00-633 Warszawa, with further offices including Kraków, Gdańsk, Katowice, Poznań, and Wrocław. Confirm which team performs testing and from where, and define data handling and any cross-border staffing in the agreement.
Official sources: https://www.pwc.pl/pl/uslugi/cyberbezpieczenstwo.html; https://www.pwc.pl/pl/o-nas/biura-pwc.html
Best fit: Large enterprises and critical infrastructure operators that want testing alongside OT security, compliance, and SOC advisory.
What sets it apart in Poland: offices in nine Polish cities and testing linked to OT security audits and NIS advisory.
| Documented strengths | Limitations / what to confirm |
|---|---|
| Covers OT and smart metering (AMI) security testing alongside IT penetration tests. | The Polish site has no dedicated pentest page with methodology or report details; request a sample report. |
| Testing can sit within wider NIS/KSC compliance and SOC advisory work. | Accreditations cited on some pwc.pl pages relate to UK schemes; confirm which apply to the team testing in Poland. |

Public offering: KPMG Poland offers penetration testing of IT systems and applications, including advanced application security testing and external and internal infrastructure testing aimed at bypassing controls and escalating to further parts of the infrastructure. Its cybersecurity page also lists IoT/IIoT device security testing, physical security testing, social engineering assessments, and verification of security monitoring and incident response. Findings are prioritised by risk level; report format and retests are not described.
Poland relevance: KPMG lists its Warsaw office at ul. Inflancka 4A, Warszawa, with further offices including Kraków, Poznań, and Wrocław. Confirm the named testing team, and define data handling and any subcontracting or cross-border staffing in the agreement.
Certifications: KPMG Poland's site lists consultant certifications including OSCE, OSCP, CEH Practical, LPT, GCPN, eCPPTv2, eWPTX, GWAPT, eMAPT, CISSP, CISM, and CISA.
Official sources: https://kpmg.com/pl/pl/uslugi/doradztwo-technologiczne/testy-penetracyjne-systemow-it-i-aplikacji.html; https://kpmg.com/pl/pl/kim-jestesmy/biura-kpmg-w-polsce.html
Best fit: Larger organisations that want application and infrastructure testing alongside social engineering, physical, and IoT testing from an advisory firm.
What sets it apart in Poland: an extensive published consultant certification set and offices in several Polish cities, with physical, social engineering, and IoT testing available.
| Documented strengths | Limitations / what to confirm |
|---|---|
| Dedicated Polish pentest page plus a long published list of offensive-security certifications. | Methodology, report contents, and retest terms are not published; request them in the proposal. |
| Broader scope available, including IoT/IIoT, physical security, and social engineering testing. | Engagement models and team composition vary; agree scope, named team, and timeline in writing. |
A DORA financial-entity assessment, a standard pentest, and TLPT serve different objectives. Do not select a TLPT provider based only on a web-application methodology or a generic DORA badge.
| Procurement question | Why it matters |
|---|---|
| Is the entity actually designated for TLPT? | DORA does not impose TLPT on every financial organization |
| Which framework and competent-authority expectations apply? | The engagement must match the applicable regulatory process |
| Who provides threat intelligence and scenarios? | TLPT must be threat-led, not simply broader vulnerability scanning |
| How are the control team and white team organized? | Governance protects secrecy, safety, and escalation |
| Which live production systems are in scope? | Realism must be balanced against operational risk |
| How are critical findings handled during the exercise? | Waiting for a final report can create unacceptable exposure |
| What evidence supports remediation closure? | The buyer needs a defensible process after testing ends |
AFINE, Securitum, and CyberForces publish specific TLPT offerings, and Pentestica and VIPentest also list TLPT. Other providers may have relevant capabilities, but the proposal must prove the full delivery model. Treat “DORA-ready report” and “DORA TLPT” as different claims.
OT/ICS testing should begin with architecture, process safety, vendor constraints, and passive discovery. A technique that is routine on a web application can disrupt a controller, engineering workstation, medical device, building system, or production process.
| Provider | Publicly stated industrial scope | Buyer validation point |
|---|---|---|
| AFINE | Critical infrastructure and industrial security | Confirm the exact OT assets, protocols, and safety model |
| LogicalTrust | SCADA and infrastructure testing | Separate enterprise IT methods from control-system methods |
| REDTEAM.PL | IT/OT, IoT, and SCADA | Confirm production safeguards and DFIR handoff |
| Prevenity | SCADA and critical environments | Validate clearances, handling, and site requirements |
| nFlo | OT/ICS penetration testing | Request passive-first discovery and maintenance-window plan |
| SEQRED | OT/ICS, IoT, and critical infrastructure | Validate protocol and vendor experience for the target estate |
| SISOFT | IoT/OT devices and vehicles | Define hardware, firmware, network, and vehicle boundaries |
| EY Poland | IT/OT security testing | Require named OT specialists and tester-days |
| PwC Poland | IT and OT cybersecurity services | Separate advisory effort from hands-on industrial testing |
The safest provider is not necessarily the one promising the most exploitation. It is the one that can obtain useful evidence without creating unacceptable operational risk.
Price comparisons fail when suppliers quote different assumptions. Give every shortlisted provider the same scoping pack and convert each response into a common table.
| Comparison field | What a complete quote should state | Red flag |
|---|---|---|
| Assets and environments | Applications, APIs, IP ranges, cloud accounts, roles, builds, locations | “Full scope” without an asset list |
| Effort | Tester-days by workstream and seniority | Only a calendar duration |
| Access model | Black, gray, or white box; accounts and documentation provided | Method label with no access assumptions |
| Manual coverage | Business logic, authorization, attack chaining, validation | Scanner brand presented as methodology |
| Production controls | Windows, rate limits, emergency contacts, stop conditions | No rules of engagement |
| Deliverables | Executive and technical reports, evidence, severity method, presentation | A certificate with no technical report |
| Critical escalation | Channel and timing for urgent findings | All findings held until final delivery |
| Retesting | Included findings, time window, number of cycles, evidence update | “Retest available” with no terms |
| Data handling | Storage region, access, encryption, retention, destruction | No answer on evidence retention |
| Exclusions | Denial of service, social engineering, physical, third parties, destructive actions | Material exclusions disclosed after signature |
| Commercial model | Fixed fee, capped time and materials, day rate, or subscription | Price cannot be traced to scope |
A continuous penetration testing model can make sense for products that release frequently, but it should not be purchased on the word “continuous” alone. Ask what triggers human testing, what assets remain covered, how quickly changes are reviewed, and how results flow into remediation.
A Polish office can simplify onsite work, Polish-language reporting, procurement, data-handling discussions, and coordination with local stakeholders. It is especially valuable for physical, social-engineering, OT, or highly regulated engagements.
A remote specialist can be the better choice for a cloud service, API, SaaS platform, or niche technical problem when location does not constrain access. The tradeoff is not local versus good; it is delivery fit, communication, legal contracting, availability, and proven expertise for the exact target.
For either model, confirm the legal entity signing the contract, where evidence is stored, who can access it, which time zone governs urgent escalation, and whether subcontractors are used.
There is no defensible market-wide price for a “pentest” because the unit is undefined. Cost changes with asset count, roles, source access, cloud accounts, tester-days, production restrictions, reporting, travel, and retesting. Compare fixed-fee, day-rate, and subscription proposals only after every provider prices the same scope. Ask for effort by workstream and list every inclusion and exclusion.
Sometimes a specific obligation, supervisory expectation, contract, or sector framework makes technical testing necessary, but most laws do not prescribe one universal pentest. The KSC Act requires risk-management and effectiveness measures for in-scope entities; GDPR requires regular evaluation of security measures; DORA includes resilience testing and TLPT for selected financial entities; and KNF Recommendation D specifically discusses systematic penetration tests for highly significant banking ICT environments.
A penetration test searches a defined asset set for exploitable vulnerabilities. A red team pursues agreed objectives to test prevention, detection, and response across people, process, and technology. TLPT is a regulated, threat-led exercise for designated financial entities with specific governance, intelligence, live-system, evidence, and remediation requirements. They overlap technically but are not interchangeable deliverables.
Choose based on the work. Local presence helps with onsite, physical, social-engineering, OT, language, contracting, and stakeholder coordination. International or remote delivery can be effective for web, API, cloud, code, and specialist product testing. Verify the contracting entity, data location, working hours, assigned testers, and ability to support urgent remediation before deciding. For a Baltic example of the same local-versus-remote choice, see our comparison of penetration testing companies in Lithuania.
Certifications such as OSCP, OSWE, OSEP, CREST, GIAC, and cloud-specific credentials can support a due-diligence decision, but they do not prove that the assigned tester fits the target. Ask for role-specific CVs, relevant project experience, a sanitized sample report, and a technical scoping conversation. Company-level ISO certification covers management processes, not the depth of every individual test.
Duration depends on effort and access, not only calendar days. A focused assessment may use a small number of tester-days, while a multi-application, infrastructure, red-team, OT, or TLPT program can run for weeks or months. Ask the quote to separate scoping, active testing, quality review, reporting, remediation support, and retesting so a short testing window is not confused with complete delivery.
Use risk and change frequency. High-value assets should be tested after material releases, architecture changes, identity redesigns, major cloud changes, or exposure shifts, in addition to any contractual or regulatory cadence. An annual test may support a stable system, while a fast-moving product may need release-triggered or continuous coverage. DORA TLPT cadence for designated entities is a separate regulatory requirement.
The Polish market offers strong specialist boutiques, industrial-security teams, network engineers, major consultancies, and international providers. The best choice is the team whose evidence, scope, testing depth, production controls, reporting, and retesting match the system and decision you need to protect.
Use the comparison to build a shortlist, then run the same technical scoping call and quote template with each provider. A well-defined penetration testing engagement is easier to compare, safer to execute, and more likely to produce findings your teams can actually fix.
Need a second opinion on scope? Ask DeepStrike for a technical scoping review and a proposal mapped to your assets, release model, and reporting requirements.
Mohammed Khalil, CISSP, OSCP, and OSWE, is a Cybersecurity Architect at DeepStrike specializing in penetration testing, cloud security, application security, and offensive-security operations.

Stay secure with DeepStrike penetration testing services. Reach out for a quote or customized technical proposal today
Contact Us