Top Penetration Testing Companies in Brazil 2026 [Updated List]

• Brazil’s digital expansion = higher cyber exposure. Fintech, open banking APIs, SaaS growth, multi cloud adoption, and e-commerce have shifted risk from network perimeters to identity, APIs, application logic, and data layers. A single misconfiguration can cascade across ecosystems.
• Breach impact is financial and reputational. Average global breach cost exceeds $5.3M USD, while Brazilian incidents often surpass R$8–10M once legal, operational, regulatory, and brand damage are included. Public companies also face stock volatility and investor confidence loss.
• Cybersecurity testing is now board level governance. CFOs, legal, compliance, and procurement teams are directly involved. Secondary effects include insurance premium inflation, contractual penalties, vendor termination risk, and intensified audits.
• Regulation and insurance are major drivers.
  • LGPD enforcement and cross border data scrutiny are tightening.
  • Cyber insurance underwriters increasingly require recent pentest reports, remediation proof, or continuous validation dashboards.
• Key 2026 market shifts:
  • AI assisted pentesting speeds discovery, but manual exploit validation remains decisive.
  • Red teaming is more advanced multi cloud pivoting, supply chain paths, living off the land, data exfil simulation.
  • PTaaS / continuous validation is growing vs. once a year audits.
  • Cloud, Kubernetes, serverless, and API misconfigurations are top exposure areas.
  • Security budgets are now formal quarterly/annual line items.
  • Buyers demand methodology transparency, sample reports, and retest policies.
  • Strong expectation for direct developer collaboration and remediation verification.
• How firms were ranked: Certifications OSCP, CISSP, CREST, OSWE, CEH, GIAC, manual testing depth, service breadth web/mobile/cloud/API/IoT/red team, industry experience fintech, healthcare, energy, government, LGPD/PCI/ISO/SOC 2 alignment, reporting clarity, Brazilian delivery maturity, innovation that supports—not replaces—human expertise, and retest/dashboard/support policies.
• Leading providers highlighted:
  • DeepStrike – manual first global PTaaS with unlimited retests, strong cloud/API and red team depth; best for enterprises and regulated sectors.
  • Blaze Information Security – Brazil born with global reach; strong fintech/crypto and deep technical reporting.
  • eSecurity – São Paulo boutique focused on localized delivery and SMB/startup needs.
  • DM11 Segurança da Informação – enterprise compliance and payment ecosystem specialization.
  • Resh Cyber Defense – ROI driven, cost effective testing for SMBs and first time buyers.
• Typical 2026 pricing USD:
  • SMB: $3k–$12k
  • Mid Market: $12k–$35k
  • Enterprise: $35k–$120k+
  • Red Team: $40k–$180k+
  • PTaaS subscriptions: ~$2k–$8k/month, often including bundled retests and executive workshops.
• Buyer guidance: Prioritize manual expertise, remediation clarity, LGPD familiarity, retest inclusion, and developer collaboration. Choose vendors based on delivery maturity and long term partnership fit, not tool lists or headline price.
• Common mistakes: Overvaluing automation, confusing vulnerability scans with real pentests, ignoring post test validation, assuming bigger firms are always better, and neglecting executive reporting quality.

In 2026, Brazilian organizations are moving from occasional audits to continuous, compliance aligned penetration testing and red team validation as a core element of enterprise risk management under LGPD pressure, insurance requirements, and AI accelerated threat activity.

Brazil’s digital economy continues to accelerate into 2026, but cyber risk exposure has expanded at an equally aggressive and in many sectors disproportionate pace. Financial technology platforms, cross‑border e‑commerce ecosystems, API‑driven SaaS growth, digital banking modernization, open‑banking APIs, and multi‑cloud infrastructure adoption have collectively widened the regional attack surface. What was once a perimeter‑focused defense model has now shifted toward identity, API, application logic, and data‑centric risk management where a single misconfigured endpoint or authentication flaw can cascade across entire ecosystems.

The average global data breach cost has exceeded $5.3M USD in 2026, while Brazilian organizations frequently experience breach impacts surpassing R$8–10 million once forensic investigations, legal expenses, regulatory notification, operational downtime, reputational damage, customer churn, shareholder impact, and long‑term brand erosion are fully calculated. For publicly traded companies, breach disclosures now influence stock volatility and investor confidence, adding an additional financial dimension beyond direct remediation costs.

Beyond direct financial losses, Brazilian enterprises increasingly face secondary and tertiary consequences including cyber‑insurance premium inflation, contractual penalty clauses triggered by security incidents, vendor termination risks in B2B supply chains, and intensified regulatory audits following public disclosures. In regulated sectors such as fintech, healthcare, and energy, a breach may also result in temporary service suspension or government‑mandated remediation timelines. This layered risk environment has pushed cybersecurity testing from a technical IT task into a board‑level governance discussion involving CFOs, legal counsel, risk officers, compliance leaders, and procurement committees.

Boardrooms, audit committees, and executive risk councils across Brazil now treat penetration testing Brazil initiatives as governance requirements rather than discretionary IT activities. AI‑assisted attack tooling, credential marketplaces, automated exploit kits, and commoditized ransomware frameworks have lowered attacker barriers while simultaneously increasing the speed, automation, and scale of potential compromise. Simultaneously, regulatory enforcement under the Lei Geral de Proteção de Dados LGPD has tightened, cross‑border data transfer scrutiny has increased, and cyber‑insurance providers now frequently require independent security validation before issuing or renewing policies. The conversation has shifted from “Should we test?” to “How frequently and how deeply should we validate our defenses?”

This ranking is based on independent, research‑driven evaluation criteria, not sponsorships, affiliate arrangements, or paid placements. The objective is to support procurement teams, CISOs, compliance leaders, CTOs, and digital transformation executives in making informed vendor shortlisting decisions grounded in technical capability, regulatory alignment, delivery maturity, reporting clarity, and real‑world engagement depth rather than marketing narratives or surface‑level tool comparisons. The emphasis throughout this guide is on procurement clarity, measurable outcomes, audit defensibility, and sustainable long‑term security posture improvement rather than one‑off compliance checkbox fulfillment.

What Changed in 2026?

The 2026 update is not cosmetic it reflects structural, operational, technological, and economic changes in how organizations evaluate and procure offensive security services in Brazil. Several macro‑level forces have reshaped buyer expectations, vendor differentiation criteria, and internal budgeting strategies:

• AI‑Assisted Pentesting Evolution: Leading firms now combine human expertise with AI‑augmented reconnaissance, anomaly detection, code pattern analysis, and attack path modeling while maintaining manual validation for exploit accuracy and contextual risk interpretation. AI accelerates discovery and prioritization, but human testers still determine exploit feasibility, chaining logic, and business impact severity.
• Adversary Simulation Sophistication: Red team Brazil engagements increasingly emulate nation‑state tactics, living‑off‑the‑land techniques, credential replay chains, supply‑chain intrusion scenarios, multi‑cloud pivoting, and multi‑stage lateral movement rather than simple vulnerability discovery exercises. Objectives now often include data exfiltration simulation and detection‑response benchmarking.
• PTaaS & Continuous Validation Growth: Subscription‑based PTaaS Brazil models have expanded as organizations shift from annual audits to quarterly, sprint‑aligned, or continuous validation cycles integrated directly into CI/CD pipelines and DevSecOps frameworks.
• Cloud & API Misconfiguration Explosion: Kubernetes clusters, serverless functions, container orchestration, microservices, and GraphQL endpoints have introduced configuration drift risks that traditional vulnerability scans fail to detect, increasing the need for manual logic testing and architectural review.
• Regulatory Enforcement Tightening: LGPD enforcement actions, data localization expectations, and cross‑border transfer scrutiny have increased documentation standards, audit evidence requirements, and reporting quality expectations for penetration testing deliverables.
• Insurance‑Driven Validation: Cyber‑insurance underwriters now frequently request recent penetration test reports, remediation evidence, executive summaries, or continuous validation dashboards before policy issuance or renewal, effectively making pentesting part of financial risk management.
• Budget Allocation Formalization: Security testing budgets are moving from ad‑hoc project spend to predictable annual or quarterly line items embedded within enterprise risk management frameworks, digital transformation initiatives, and board‑approved risk tolerance thresholds.
• Procurement Maturity: Buyers increasingly request methodology transparency, retest policies, sample reports, and proof of manual testing depth rather than accepting automated scan deliverables or tool screenshots as evidence of security diligence.
• Developer Collaboration Expectations: Modern buyers expect pentest vendors to communicate directly with engineering teams, provide reproducible proof‑of‑concepts, and support remediation verification cycles.

These shifts justify a structured 2026 authority upgrade rather than a superficial refresh, ensuring that vendor comparisons remain aligned with real‑world buyer priorities, evolving threat dynamics, and the practical realities of modern cloud‑first digital infrastructure.

How We Ranked the Top Penetration Testing Companies in Brazil 2026

Companies were evaluated holistically across multiple dimensions rather than a single numeric score, reflecting real‑world buyer decision processes where risk tolerance, compliance exposure, digital maturity, and internal security capabilities vary significantly between organizations. Assessment criteria included:

• Technical expertise & certifications OSCP, CISSP, CREST, OSWE, CEH, GIAC, etc.
• Depth of manual penetration testing capabilities and exploit validation rigor
• Service scope & specialization across web, mobile, infrastructure, cloud, API, IoT, and red team domains
• Industry experience across regulated and high‑risk sectors including fintech, healthcare, telecom, energy, and government
• Compliance alignment PCI DSS, ISO 27001, SOC 2, LGPD, HIPAA where applicable
• Reporting transparency, remediation guidance quality, and executive communication clarity
• Regional presence and delivery maturity within Brazil and Latin America
• Innovation supporting not replacing human expertise
• Use‑case fit Enterprise vs SMB vs Regulated vs Startup environments
• Retest policies, dashboard access, and post‑engagement support structures
• Collaboration capability with internal development and DevOps teams

No company was included or excluded based on sponsorship, advertising relationships, or affiliate considerations. Editorial methodology remained consistent across all providers to preserve neutrality, procurement credibility, and audit defensibility for organizations referencing this guide internally.

Top Penetration Testing Companies in Brazil

DeepStrike Manual Pentesting Excellence with Global Credentials

Best For: Enterprises, fintech, SaaS platforms, compliance‑driven organizations, high‑growth startups, cloud‑native businesses

DeepStrike maintains the top position due to its consistent emphasis on manual, practitioner‑led security testing rather than automation‑heavy assessments. The firm operates with a global delivery model while serving Brazilian clients across fintech, healthcare, SaaS, e‑commerce, enterprise software, and digital infrastructure verticals where GDPR security testing Brazil, PCI DSS pentest Brazil, and cross‑border data handling obligations are critical. Their methodology prioritizes logic‑based vulnerabilities, chained exploit scenarios, and business‑impact validation rather than checklist‑driven output or purely scanner‑generated reports.

DeepStrike’s service portfolio spans web application penetration testing services, mobile application penetration testing, cloud penetration testing services, infrastructure assessments, API testing, and advanced red team Brazil adversary simulation programs. Organizations adopting DevOps pipelines increasingly engage DeepStrike for continuous penetration testing services and PTaaS dashboards that align with sprint releases, agile deployment cycles, and microservice architecture evolution. Their delivery model often includes real‑time collaboration channels and remediation validation loops, reducing friction between security and engineering teams.

The firm’s reporting methodology maps findings to OWASP, NIST, ISO 27001, SOC 2, and PCI DSS frameworks while offering unlimited retest validation a differentiator for regulated industries requiring documented remediation proof. DeepStrike also integrates advisory insights drawn from evolving threat intelligence, updated cybersecurity statistics, AI‑driven intrusion patterns, and breach trend analysis affecting Latin American and global markets.

2026 Focus: Expanded adversary emulation depth, increased API and Kubernetes specialization, tighter LGPD documentation alignment, enhanced enterprise PTaaS dashboards, improved executive‑level reporting formats, and broader multi‑region delivery coordination across Latin America and North America.

Blaze Information Security Brazil‑Born Specialists with Global Reach

Best For: Financial services, crypto platforms, mid‑market enterprises, technology exporters, blockchain startups

Blaze Information Security combines Brazilian roots with international delivery capabilities, creating a hybrid model attractive to organizations operating across multiple jurisdictions. Known for deep technical reporting, exploit chain validation, and code‑level analysis, Blaze provides web, mobile, network, wireless, and cloud testing alongside red teaming, threat modeling, and secure code review services. Their bilingual delivery model supports cross‑border clients while maintaining strong regional LGPD awareness and documentation maturity.

2026 Focus: Increased blockchain and digital asset platform testing, expanded European presence, deeper integration of automated reconnaissance with manual exploit verification, and stronger fintech compliance advisory capabilities.

eSecurity Offensive Security Boutique in São Paulo

Best For: Mid‑sized businesses, startups, Portuguese‑language delivery, regional enterprises, local compliance needs

Operating as a focused offensive security boutique, eSecurity delivers internal and external pentests, web and mobile testing, social engineering assessments, and targeted advisory services. Their strength lies in localized engagement, direct senior‑level involvement, and communication clarity for domestic Brazilian organizations that prefer native‑language reporting, culturally aligned collaboration, and geographically close delivery teams.

2026 Focus: Stronger SMB market positioning, increased cloud configuration testing, expanded training and awareness programs, and improved executive‑level risk communication aligned with LGPD documentation requirements and regional compliance audits.

DM11 Segurança da Informação Enterprise Compliance‑Driven Testing

Best For: Payment processors, financial institutions, large enterprises, regulated industries, audit‑heavy organizations

DM11 differentiates through a strong compliance and enterprise maturity lens. Their offerings include network, infrastructure, and application pentesting supported by Pentest‑as‑a‑Service Brazil subscription models, payment ecosystem specialization, and structured maturity scoring frameworks. They frequently operate alongside internal compliance, audit, and legal teams, making them attractive to organizations preparing for external certification reviews and regulatory inspections.

2026 Focus: Enhanced PCI DSS v4.0 alignment, broader enterprise retainer programs, integrated maturity scoring dashboards, expanded advisory support for regulated digital payment ecosystems, and improved documentation packages for auditors.

Resh Cyber Defense Proactive ROI‑Focused Security Testing

Best For: SMBs, first‑time pentest buyers, cost‑conscious organizations, regional businesses, early‑stage startups

Resh Cyber Defense positions its value proposition around breach prevention economics and ROI justification. Their engagements emphasize practical vulnerability discovery, business‑oriented reporting, and cost‑effective delivery without sacrificing manual validation depth. Their messaging frequently centers on the economic contrast between preventive testing costs and post‑breach recovery expenses, making them appealing to organizations building initial cybersecurity maturity.

2026 Focus: Expanded continuous validation offerings, improved executive dashboards, broader SMB education initiatives, enhanced ROI‑driven reporting methodologies, and increased collaboration with regional technology hubs and incubators.

2026 Comparison Snapshot

2026 Penetration Testing Pricing in Brazil

Pricing structures have shifted toward hybrid subscription and continuous validation models rather than purely one‑off engagements. Market averages vary based on scope, complexity, application architecture, reporting depth expectations, executive presentation requirements, and regulatory documentation needs:

SMB Tier: $3,000 – $12,000 per assessment depending on application size, infrastructure complexity, and reporting scope.

Mid‑Market: $12,000 – $35,000 including multi‑application testing, limited cloud scope, structured remediation workshops, and retest validation.

Enterprise: $35,000 – $120,000+ including multi‑vector testing, red team elements, executive presentations, compliance mapping documentation, and engineering collaboration cycles.

Red Team / Adversary Simulation: $40,000 – $180,000+ based on engagement duration, stealth requirements, organizational size, and detection‑response benchmarking objectives.

Additional considerations:

• Retest policies increasingly bundled rather than charged separately
• PTaaS Brazil subscriptions ranging from $2,000 – $8,000 monthly
• Continuous validation replacing annual single‑point audits
• Executive workshops and remediation briefings influencing total cost
• Multi‑region coordination increasing pricing for multinational enterprises
• Compliance documentation packages affecting enterprise pricing tiers

How to Choose the Right Penetration Testing Company in Brazil

• Prioritize manual expertise over tool volume and scanner output quantity
• Verify regulatory and industry framework familiarity relevant to your sector
• Assess report clarity, remediation practicality, and executive communication quality
• Evaluate retest, validation, and post‑engagement support policies
• Match engagement style to organizational maturity and internal security capabilities
• Request methodology transparency, sample deliverables, and reporting templates before procurement
• Consider long‑term partnership potential rather than one‑off engagement convenience

Organizations comparing cloud penetration testing Brazil, red team Brazil, PCI DSS pentest Brazil, or PTaaS Brazil services should align vendor strengths with risk exposure, digital architecture complexity, and compliance obligations rather than headline pricing alone.

What Most Buyers Get Wrong When Comparing Firms

• Overvaluing automation and tool lists instead of human expertise and exploit validation
• Confusing vulnerability scans with true penetration testing engagements
• Ignoring remediation guidance depth and developer collaboration support
• Assuming larger firms automatically deliver better outcomes
• Failing to evaluate retest, dashboard access, and post‑engagement validation policies
• Selecting vendors based solely on cost without assessing delivery maturity
• Neglecting executive communication clarity and audit documentation quality

Frequently Asked Questions

• How is AI impacting penetration testing in 2026?

AI accelerates reconnaissance, anomaly detection, and pattern recognition, but human expertise remains essential for exploit validation, contextual risk analysis, and business‑impact interpretation. AI acts as an accelerator, not a replacement for skilled ethical hackers.

• Is continuous pentesting replacing annual audits?

For many SaaS, fintech, and digital‑first organizations, quarterly or continuous PTaaS models are supplementing not entirely replacing annual compliance audits. Continuous validation enhances rather than eliminates formal audit cycles.

• Do insurers now require penetration testing?

Increasingly yes. Many cyber‑insurance underwriters request recent independent security testing evidence, remediation proof, or dashboard access before issuing or renewing policies.

• What certifications matter most in 2026?

OSCP, CISSP, OSWE, and CREST remain widely recognized, particularly when combined with demonstrated real‑world engagement experience, exploit chaining capability, and documented remediation collaboration.

• How often should Brazilian companies perform penetration testing?

At minimum annually, but high‑growth SaaS, fintech, and cloud‑native organizations increasingly adopt quarterly or continuous validation cycles aligned with deployment frequency, compliance exposure, and business risk tolerance.

Ready to Strengthen Your Defenses? The threats of 2026 demand more than just awareness; they require readiness. If you're looking to validate your security posture, identify hidden risks, or build a resilient defense strategy, DeepStrike is here to help. Our team of practitioners provides clear, actionable guidance to protect your business. Explore our Penetration Testing Services to see how we can uncover vulnerabilities before attackers do. Drop us a line, we’re always ready to dive in.

About the Author

Mohammed Khalil is a Cybersecurity Architect at DeepStrike, specializing in advanced penetration testing and offensive security operations. With certifications including CISSP, OSCP, and OSWE, he has led numerous red team engagements for Fortune 500 companies, focusing on cloud security, application vulnerabilities, adversary emulation, and complex attack‑chain analysis. His work involves dissecting multi‑stage intrusion scenarios, advising executive leadership on cyber‑risk mitigation strategies, mentoring security teams, and developing resilient defense architectures for clients in the finance, healthcare, technology, and digital commerce sectors.