September 17, 2025
Updated: November 5, 2026
Compare 12 penetration testing companies serving Australia by testing depth, delivery model, local fit, pricing signals, retesting, and assurance support.
Mohammed Khalil

Australia has no single penetration testing provider that is best for every organization. For product and engineering teams, DeepStrike (the publisher of this guide, which lists itself first) offers a manual-first Penetration Testing as a Service (PTaaS) model, which combines one-off and continuous testing, live collaboration, remediation support, and retesting. Large enterprises may prefer CyberCX or Thales/Tesserent for broader consulting coverage, while Secolve specializes in operational technology. Compare providers by scope expertise, tester independence, reporting quality, data handling, remediation workflow, and evidence, not brand size alone. This guide evaluates 12 credible options serving Australian buyers in 2026.
Comparing providers beyond Australia? Our global list of top penetration testing companies covers firms that deliver testing across regions. For a nearby Southeast Asian market, see our guide to penetration testing companies in Indonesia.
DeepStrike publishes this guide and provides penetration testing services. We list DeepStrike first because we publish this guide; the order is not a score or ranking. That commercial relationship is a potential source of bias, so every provider profile is based on current public evidence, and the same procurement questions should be applied to DeepStrike. DeepStrike will not be the right choice for every requirement.
We reviewed current official service pages and authoritative ownership or accreditation sources available on August 5, 2026, and rechecked provider details and CREST's public marketplace in November 2026. A provider had to serve Australian buyers, publicly offer penetration testing or offensive-security services, and add a distinct use case to the shortlist.
We compared providers on manual testing depth, reporting and retesting, scope coverage, delivery model, Australian buyer fit and public transparency. DeepStrike publishes this guide and lists itself first; that position is publisher placement, not a score. Companies 2 through 12 are organized to show different buyer fits; their order is not a ranking.
Marketing claims, customer-review counts, unverifiable credentials, and anonymous success stories were not used as selection evidence. Buyers should still request a named delivery team, sample report, rules of engagement, data-handling terms, insurance evidence, references, and written retesting terms before signing.
| Provider | Best for | Delivery signal | Distinctive scope signal | Pricing visibility reviewed |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1. DeepStrike | Manual-first PTaaS for product and engineering teams | One-off and recurring testing with collaboration tooling | Web, API, mobile, cloud, AI/LLM, network, and red team | Public plan structure; quote required |
| 2. CyberCX | Large enterprises needing broad local coverage | Large consulting and assurance program | Applications, networks, OT, AI, hardware, physical, and social engineering | Quote required |
| 3. Thales/Tesserent | Enterprise and critical-infrastructure programs | Global cybersecurity services with ANZ capability | Penetration testing and red teaming within a broader portfolio | Quote required |
| 4. Sekuro | Risk-led offensive-security programs | Consulting-led testing and adversary simulation | Applications, APIs, infrastructure, mobile, IoT, and wireless | Quote required |
| 5. StickmanCyber | Compliance-focused midmarket teams | Assessment-led testing with compliance support | Web, network, cloud, and SCADA/OT/IoT assessments | Quote required |
| 6. The Missing Link | Integrated offensive and managed-security needs | Offensive security within a broader Australian cyber provider | Applications, infrastructure, cloud, people, and red teaming | Quote required |
| 7. Project Black | Boutique Australian testing with public price signals | Specialist consultancy and scoped projects | Web, API, network, mobile, wireless, and social engineering | Public indicative ranges |
| 8. elttam | Deep manual technical assessments | Research-led specialist assessments | Source code, binaries, infrastructure, and firmware | Quote required |
| 9. Gridware | Broad testing across mixed environments | Project-based testing and adversary simulation | Web, mobile, network, wireless, IoT, and PCI-related scopes | Quote required |
| 10. Triskele Labs | Australian-owned end-to-end cyber support | Offensive security plus broader cyber services | External, internal, application, and mobile testing | Quote required |
| 11. Secolve | OT and industrial environments | OT-specialist security services | Industrial systems and critical-infrastructure environments | Quote required |
| 12. White Rook Cyber | Regulated and critical sectors | CREST-accredited Australian consultancy | Penetration testing, red teaming, and adversary simulation | Quote required |
“Quote required” means a price was not displayed on the official service page reviewed for this update. It is not a judgment about cost or value. Scope, access, complexity, reporting, travel, delivery location, and retesting terms can materially change a quote.
ASD's latest full-year national threat report, the Annual Cyber Threat Report 2025–26 (released October 2026), says ASD's Australian Cyber Security Centre responded to more than 1,500 cyber security incidents and received more than 82,000 cybercrime reports in FY2025–26. In FY2024–25 it answered more than 42,500 hotline calls, up 16%, responded to more than 1,200 cybersecurity incidents, up 11%, and received more than 84,700 cybercrime reports (Annual Cyber Threat Report 2024–25). These figures do not prove that every organization needs the same test, but they do support a risk-based case for validating exposed systems and high-consequence attack paths.
Notifiable Data Breaches (NDB) notifications are also at a record level. In July 2026, the Office of the Australian Information Commissioner (OAIC) reported 1,205 notifications for calendar year 2025, an 8% increase from 1,112 in 2024 and the highest annual total since the scheme began in 2018. A pentest cannot prevent every breach (human error, suppliers, and process failures also matter), but it can identify exploitable technical paths before they become incidents. See the OAIC's 2025 notification statistics.
Penetration testing is most valuable when it answers a defined business question: Can an internet attacker reach customer data? Can a compromised employee account move laterally? Can a low-privilege user approve a transaction? Can a cloud role cross an isolation boundary? The scope should follow the threat model, and the report should show what was attempted, what succeeded, what controls worked, and what remains untested.

Public offering: DeepStrike's penetration testing services describe human-led testing across applications, cloud environments, and infrastructure, supported by a findings and collaboration platform. Its public process covers planning, reconnaissance, vulnerability discovery, controlled exploitation, reporting, and technical support. Published reports include reproduction steps, remediation guidance, and root-cause information; the proposal should define exact coverage and commercial terms.
Australia relevance: Founded in 2016, DeepStrike LLC is headquartered in Newark, Delaware, has 11–50 employees, and also publishes a business address in Dubai, UAE (IFZA Business Park). It delivers testing remotely for Australian clients; define tester locations, permitted subcontracting, and data-handling restrictions in the engagement agreement.
Team certifications: OSCP, OSWE, OSEP, OSWP, GXPN, GWAPT, eCPPT, eMAPT, eWPT, CREST CPSA, CRTP, CRTE, and Microsoft Azure Security Engineer Associate, as shown on DeepStrike's services page.
Official sources: Pricing , Contact Us
Best fit: Engineering teams that need application, cloud, or infrastructure testing with direct remediation collaboration.
| Documented strengths | Limits and buying considerations |
|---|---|
| Human-led testing with reproduction evidence, root-cause information, and remediation guidance. | The service description is not an independently measured quality comparison. Assess the assigned team and a relevant sample report. |
| The published Basic plan lists Slack collaboration, customizable reports, and 12 months of remediation retesting. | No numeric price is displayed on the pricing page. Basic is a one-shot test; recurring coverage belongs to a different plan, with contract-specific terms. |
| Team certifications shown on the services page include OSCP, OSWE, OSEP, OSWP, GXPN, GWAPT, eCPPT, eMAPT, eWPT, CREST CPSA, CRTP, CRTE, and Microsoft Azure Security Engineer Associate. | These are individual tester credentials, not a company-level accreditation; ask which certified testers will be assigned to your engagement. |

Public offering: CyberCX's CREST Marketplace profile describes a group that delivers end-to-end cyber security services for enterprise and government, and CREST lists it under security testing, incident management, and secure operations. Accenture's CREST profile states that it acquired CyberCX in February 2026. Testing scope, methodology, and deliverables are agreed per engagement, so request the current service catalogue and a sample report.
Australia relevance: CyberCX's CREST profile cites more than 20 offices across Australia and New Zealand, and CREST's public marketplace lists CyberCX Pty Ltd, headquartered in Australia, with penetration testing, incident response, and SOC accreditations. After the Accenture acquisition, confirm the contracting entity, the delivery team, tester locations, and data handling in the agreement.
Official sources: https://cybercx.com.au/; https://marketplace.crest.org/supplier/cybercx-pty-ltd/
Best fit: Large enterprises and government organizations that want penetration testing connected to incident response, managed security, or wider consulting.
| Documented strengths | Limits and buying considerations |
|---|---|
| CREST marketplace accreditations cover penetration testing, incident response, and security operations centre services. | Accreditation applies to the listed entity and service discipline; confirm which CyberCX team performs your test. |
| More than 20 offices across Australia and New Zealand, per its CREST profile. | Enterprise procurement can affect timelines; agree start dates, named testers, and retest terms in the proposal. |

Public offering: Thales's CREST Marketplace profile describes a cybersecurity portfolio that protects identities and data and includes compliance audits, threat detection, and penetration tests. The profile notes that Thales Cyber Services in Australia and New Zealand was formerly Tesserent, acquired by Thales Australia in October 2023; the tesserent.com domain now redirects to Thales. Scope, methodology, and deliverables are agreed per engagement.
Australia relevance: CREST's public marketplace lists Thales, headquartered in Australia, with penetration testing accreditation and ISO 27001. Confirm the exact Thales contracting entity, the local delivery team, any required tester clearances, and data-handling terms in the agreement.
Official sources: https://www.thalesgroup.com/en/worldwide/australia; https://marketplace.crest.org/supplier/thales/
Best fit: Defense, government, and critical-infrastructure organizations that want testing from a provider with a wider security and technology portfolio.
| Documented strengths | Limits and buying considerations |
|---|---|
| CREST penetration testing accreditation and ISO 27001 listed for the Australian entity. | Former Tesserent clients should confirm their current delivery team and contacts under the Thales brand. |
| Penetration tests sit within a portfolio that includes compliance audits and threat detection. | A broad portfolio does not show testing depth for a specific stack; request the methodology and a relevant sample report. |

Public offering: Sekuro's offensive security page lists penetration testing across web applications, APIs, infrastructure, mobile, IoT, thick clients, wireless networks, and virtual environments. Related services include red teaming, purple teaming, CORIE red teaming for financial services, physical intrusion assessments, social engineering assessments, CIS benchmark reviews, and OT security services.
Australia relevance: Sekuro lists Australian offices in Sydney (L5, 727 George Street), Melbourne, Brisbane, and Perth, plus offices in Singapore, the Philippines, Malaysia, and the UK. CREST's public marketplace lists Sekuro with penetration testing accreditation and ISO 27001 (headquarters shown as the United Kingdom); confirm which team and location will perform your test and how data is handled. Insight Enterprises, a US-listed technology provider, completed its acquisition of Sekuro in November 2025; Sekuro continues to trade under its own name. Confirm the contracting entity, tester locations and data handling in the agreement.
Official sources: https://sekuro.io/solutions/offensive-security/; https://sekuro.io/contact-us/
Best fit: Midmarket and enterprise buyers that want penetration testing alongside adversary simulation, CORIE, or governance and risk work.
| Documented strengths | Limits and buying considerations |
|---|---|
| Broad published testing scope plus red teaming, purple teaming, and CORIE red teaming. | Ask the proposal to separate penetration testing effort from advisory or product work so bids remain comparable. |
| Four Australian offices and CREST penetration testing accreditation. | As a multi-country group owned by Insight Enterprises since November 2025, define the contracting entity, tester locations, and data storage explicitly. |

Public offering: StickmanCyber's penetration testing page lists manual black-box and grey-box web application testing, iOS and Android mobile application testing, external and internal network testing, Wi-Fi assessments, AI and LLM assessments, and OT and IoT assessments. It describes findings ranked by business risk, discussion with the client's technical team, and retesting to confirm fixes. Testing sits within a wider assess, plan, and remediate service model.
Australia relevance: StickmanCyber lists its corporate office at Level 1, 3 Innovation Road, Macquarie Park, Sydney, and states that it is a CREST ANZ registered entity for penetration testing and a PCI QSA company. CREST's public marketplace lists Stickman Consulting Pty Ltd with penetration testing, incident response, and SOC accreditations; confirm the contracting entity and tester locations in the agreement.
Official sources: https://www.stickmancyber.com/penetration-testing; https://www.stickmancyber.com/contact-us
Best fit: Small and midsize organizations that want testing tied to compliance work and remediation support.
| Documented strengths | Limits and buying considerations |
|---|---|
| Published scope includes web, mobile, network, Wi-Fi, AI and LLM, and OT and IoT assessments, with retesting before closure. | The page describes an AI engine that correlates security data; confirm how much of each test is performed manually. |
| CREST marketplace accreditation for penetration testing, plus stated PCI QSA company status. | Where the same provider also remediates findings, agree how testing independence is maintained. |

Public offering: The Missing Link's penetration testing page covers web applications, external and internal networks and infrastructure, cloud infrastructure, mobile applications, and social engineering, with red team testing and CORIE readiness listed under offensive security. It describes engagements that usually begin with a vulnerability scan but are mostly manual, moving through reconnaissance, scanning, exploitation, post-exploitation analysis, and reporting. Reports include technical findings and executive-ready remediation guidance.
Australia relevance: The Missing Link lists offices at Level 2, 100 Arthur Street, North Sydney, and in Docklands, Melbourne, plus London, and states that it is part of Infosys. CREST's public marketplace lists The Missing Link Security with penetration testing accreditation and ISO 27001; define tester locations and data handling in the agreement.
Certifications: The penetration testing page states that testers hold OSCP, OSCE, OSWE, and OSEE certifications and that the company is a CVE Numbering Authority.
Official sources: https://www.themissinglink.com.au/penetration-testing; https://www.themissinglink.com.au/contact-us
Best fit: Organizations that want penetration testing from a provider that also supplies IT, cloud, and managed security services.
| Documented strengths | Limits and buying considerations |
|---|---|
| Mostly manual testing across web, network, cloud, mobile, and social engineering, with red team and CORIE readiness options. | The page does not describe retesting terms; confirm retest windows in the proposal. |
| CREST marketplace accreditation for penetration testing and stated ISO 27001 certification. | When the same provider manages your IT or cloud, agree how testing independence and findings escalation will work. |

Public offering: Project Black's penetration testing page lists web application and API, internal network, external network, wireless network, and mobile application testing, plus social engineering. Deliverables include a detailed report with remediation recommendations, a debrief call, an optional redacted report and testing certificate, and a real-time portal where high and critical findings are published during testing; a retest is optional. The page states that most tests fall between A$6,000 and A$10,000 depending on scope, that the smallest projects start from about A$3,600, and that testing can generally start within two weeks of signing.
Australia relevance: Project Black lists offices at Level 17, 123 Pitt Street, Sydney, and Level 23, 727 Collins Street, Melbourne, with testers also in Brisbane. CREST's public marketplace lists Project Black with penetration testing accreditation; define tester assignment and data handling in the agreement.
Certifications: Project Black lists consultant certifications including CREST CRT, OSCP, and OSCE, plus GIAC GCSA and Microsoft AZ-500 for application security work.
Official sources: https://projectblack.io/penetration-testing/; https://projectblack.io/
Best fit: Buyers who want a focused Australian consultancy and an early public price benchmark before scoping.
| Documented strengths | Limits and buying considerations |
|---|---|
| Published price ranges, start time, and a real-time findings portal. | Indicative ranges depend on scope assumptions; confirm what is included before comparing quotes. |
| CREST marketplace accreditation for penetration testing, with offices in Sydney and Melbourne. | Retesting is optional; agree whether it is included and within what window. |

Public offering: elttam describes a single core service, advanced penetration testing, delivered as security auditing (manual analysis of source code, binaries, infrastructure, and firmware), adversary simulation with red and purple team exercises, and applied research for non-standard problems such as AI/ML or novel platforms. Published deliverables include reproducible proofs of concept or reproduction steps, prioritized remediation guidance, an executive summary, and optional retesting.
Australia relevance: elttam lists its office at Suite 343, 3 Albert Coates Lane, Melbourne. Its site does not list a company accreditation, and we did not find it in CREST's public marketplace in November 2026; buyers that need one should treat it as a procurement gate and define tester locations and data handling in the agreement.
Official sources: https://elttam.com/what-we-do; https://elttam.com/contact
Best fit: Security-mature product and platform teams that need deep, source-assisted, or research-led assessments.
| Documented strengths | Limits and buying considerations |
|---|---|
| Manual security auditing across source code, binaries, infrastructure, and firmware, with reproducible proofs of concept. | No company accreditation is published; confirm whether your procurement requires one. |
| Adversary simulation and applied research for advanced or emerging technology. | Research-led work needs a clear objective; define the expected output so proposals remain comparable. |

Public offering: Gridware's penetration testing page lists adversary simulation, web application testing, network security testing, and internal network testing, and its site also lists AI penetration testing and cyber war gaming. It describes testing that combines in-house tools, vulnerability scanning, and manual scripts, references methodologies such as the ASD ISM, the CREST penetration testing guide, OSSTMM, OWASP, PTES, NIST, and ISSAF, and ends with a report of findings and remediation recommendations. Gridware also offers managed security services and incident response retainers.
Australia relevance: Gridware lists its Sydney office at Level 36, Australia Square, 264 George Street, and says it also operates in Melbourne. Its site displays an ISO 27001 certification; we did not find Gridware in CREST's public marketplace in November 2026, so confirm any accreditation your procurement requires, along with tester locations and data handling.
Official sources: https://gridware.com.au/penetration-testing/; https://gridware.com.au/contact-us/
Best fit: Organizations that want one Australian provider to coordinate several offensive security workstreams alongside managed security.
| Documented strengths | Limits and buying considerations |
|---|---|
| Published scope covers web, network, internal, and adversary simulation testing with named reference methodologies. | Referencing the CREST testing guide is not the same as CREST company accreditation; confirm accreditation needs separately. |
| Managed security services and incident response retainers are available from the same provider. | Ask for separate scope, effort, and deliverables per workstream when a proposal combines several services. |

Public offering: Triskele Labs' offensive security page lists penetration testing across web, mobile, APIs, cloud platforms, internal and external networks, wireless infrastructure, devices, and OT, plus social engineering, cloud security reviews, and red teaming. It describes custom scoping, reporting with prioritized findings, and retesting to verify remediation. The company also provides managed detection and response, incident response, and governance, risk, and compliance services.
Australia relevance: Triskele Labs states that it is 100% Australian owned and operated and lists offices in Melbourne (Level 16, 380 Collins Street), Sydney, Perth, and Canberra. CREST's public marketplace lists Triskele Labs Global Pty Ltd with penetration testing and incident response accreditations, plus ISO 27001 and ISO 20000; define tester assignment and data handling in the agreement.
Certifications: Triskele Labs states that its web application testers hold OSCP, OSWE, and OSCE certifications.
Official sources: https://www.triskelelabs.com/offensive-security; https://www.triskelelabs.com/contact
Best fit: Australian organizations that want offensive testing alongside incident response or managed detection from one provider.
| Documented strengths | Limits and buying considerations |
|---|---|
| Broad published scope with retesting and remediation verification. | If Triskele Labs also monitors your environment, agree how testing independence and findings handling will work. |
| CREST penetration testing and incident response accreditations on the public marketplace. | Request named testers and a sample report for your asset types. |

Public offering: Secolve focuses on operational technology security. Its offensive security services include penetration testing, security architecture and risk modelling, adversary simulation and cyber resilience exercises, and purple teaming, alongside OT advisory, governance, risk, and compliance services and OT security awareness training.
Australia relevance: Secolve Pty Ltd lists offices at Level 12, 64 York Street, Sydney, and 152 St Georges Terrace, Perth, and references frameworks such as AESCSF, the SOCI Act, and ISA/IEC 62443. We did not find it in CREST's public marketplace in November 2026; confirm any required accreditation, and agree safety-led rules of engagement, tester locations, and data handling in the agreement.
Official sources: https://secolve.com/offensive-security/; https://secolve.com/contact/
Best fit: Energy, utilities, manufacturing, transport, mining, and other operators of industrial control systems.
| Documented strengths | Limits and buying considerations |
|---|---|
| OT-specialist offensive testing, adversary simulation, and resilience exercises. | OT testing needs safety-led planning; require stop conditions, site coordination, and non-destructive techniques in the rules of engagement. |
| Works against OT frameworks such as AESCSF, the SOCI Act, and ISA/IEC 62443. | Framework references are not accreditations; confirm sector experience and named testers. |

Public offering: White Rook Cyber describes CREST-accredited penetration testing of networks, applications, and cloud environments, with reports written for board-level readers. Its CREST profile lists testing of external networks, internal infrastructure, web applications, mobile applications, and wireless environments using methodologies aligned to OWASP and the ACSC Essential Eight, alongside managed security operations, governance, risk and compliance, and cloud security services.
Australia relevance: White Rook Cyber lists its head office at 4/27 Mayneview Street, Milton (Brisbane), with offices in Perth and Melbourne and onsite work in Sydney by appointment. CREST's public marketplace lists it with penetration testing accreditation, and its CREST profile states that client data is stored only in Australian data centres; confirm tester assignment and any required clearances in the agreement.
Official sources: https://whiterookcyber.com.au/penetration-testing/; https://whiterookcyber.com.au/contact/
Best fit: Regulated, government-adjacent, and critical-sector buyers that want an Australian CREST-accredited provider with onshore data handling.
| Documented strengths | Limits and buying considerations |
|---|---|
| CREST marketplace accreditation for penetration testing and a stated Australia-only data storage policy. | Accreditation narrows one due-diligence question; still review the assigned team and a sample report. |
| Offices in Brisbane, Perth, and Melbourne. | Sydney work is onsite by appointment; confirm availability and scheduling for your location. |
Start with hard requirements, not logos. The DeepStrike penetration testing services page outlines common asset types and black-, gray-, and white-box approaches, but the right choice depends on what decision your organization must make after the test.
Use the SCOPE-R model to evaluate every bidder consistently. A provider that fails a hard gate should not be rescued by a lower price or a polished sales deck.
Define systems, APIs, roles, environments, trust boundaries, exclusions, testing windows, and the attacker outcomes you care about. Decide whether you need a web application penetration test, external network test, internal test, source-assisted review, or a combined assessment.
Mobile scope should include the client, backend APIs, authentication flows, platform-specific storage, and relevant business logic rather than only the installable package. Use a specialist mobile application testing scope when those elements matter.
Cloud testing requires explicit authorization and shared-responsibility boundaries. A cloud penetration test may need to cover identity, control-plane configuration, workload paths, secrets, storage, network boundaries, and tenant-specific restrictions.
AI-enabled products introduce model interfaces, retrieval systems, tools, plugins, data flows, and authorization paths that may not appear in a conventional application scope. If those are material, compare providers with a defined AI and LLM penetration-testing methodology.
Evaluate the people who will perform the work, not only the company logo. Request names or role profiles, relevant experience, current certifications, specialist depth, and examples of how the team validates business logic and chained attack paths. A company accreditation and an individual certification answer different questions.
The OWASP Web Security Testing Guide is a useful reference for web-testing coverage, but a methodology label alone does not prove depth. Ask which test cases apply, what is out of scope, how authenticated roles are covered, and how testers move beyond automated findings.
Confirm the contracting entity, tester location, working hours, secure evidence exchange, data storage, retention and deletion, subprocessors, insurance, background checks, and breach-notification terms. Australian data residency is not automatically guaranteed by an Australian landing page or an Australian customer base.
For regulated or government environments, make panel status, citizenship, clearances, physical presence, and sovereign-data requirements pass/fail gates. Resolve them before technical scoping so neither side wastes time on an ineligible proposal.
Require written authorization, rules of engagement, emergency contacts, critical-finding escalation, prohibited actions, production-safety controls, stop conditions, and a clear change process. Compare the effort assigned to reconnaissance, manual testing, validation, reporting, and debriefing.
A robust procurement process should also review a sample report and ask the questions in this penetration-testing vendor guide. Redact client data, but do not accept a table of contents as proof of report quality.
Agree on what evidence the test must produce: executive summary, technical findings, affected assets, reproduction detail, exploit narrative, business impact, severity rationale, remediation guidance, scope limitations, positive controls, and an attestation or closure letter if required.
The CREST Australia and New Zealand procurement guide can support supplier due diligence. Still verify the live directory entry and its service discipline rather than treating a logo as sufficient evidence.
Define how questions are handled, how disputed findings are resolved, what qualifies for a retest, how many retest cycles or what time window is included, and what the final closure artifact contains. “Free retesting” is incomplete unless the contract defines scope, timing, exclusions, and availability.
Use a bounded project when the scope is stable and you need a point-in-time assessment for a release, customer request, procurement gate, or audit. It should still include manual validation, a debrief, remediation support, and agreed retesting.
PTaaS adds a collaboration and delivery layer around testing. It can improve visibility, finding triage, developer interaction, and retest workflow, but the label alone says nothing about manual depth. Compare tester time, scope, cadence, and deliverables.
Continuous testing is useful for frequently changing products when testing is triggered by new features, APIs, material releases, or a risk-based cadence. Do not confuse continuous scanning with continuous manual penetration testing; a sound proposal should state which activities are automated and which are human-led.
A red team answers a broader objective-based question: whether an adversary can achieve a defined outcome across technology, identity, people, and process while testing detection and response. It is not simply a longer pentest. Consider a red-team engagement when your control maturity and incident-response capability can support the exercise.
There is no defensible single “average pentest price” without a scope definition. Cost is driven by target type, number of assets, application size, APIs, authenticated roles, architecture complexity, test depth, source access, environments, business-logic workflows, testing windows, travel, reporting, compliance mapping, and retesting. For typical USD ranges by test type and the rates behind them, see our penetration testing cost guide.
Public signals can still help. Project Black publishes provider-specific indications of A$6,000–A$10,000 for most tests and about A$3,600 for its smallest scope. DeepStrike publishes plan structure and delivery terms but requires scoping for a quote. These are not equivalent products or market-wide benchmarks.
Ask every bidder for the same assumptions. A strong penetration-testing quote should identify in-scope and out-of-scope assets, access level, tester effort, schedule, methodology, deliverables, exclusions, dependencies, travel or rush fees, remediation support, and retesting. A cheaper quote may be good value, or it may simply contain fewer days and less coverage.
Penetration testing can support assurance, but it does not guarantee security or compliance. The obligation, scope, cadence, independence, and evidence required depend on the entity, system, contract, assessor, and framework version.
| Framework or obligation | What the source says | How a pentest can help | What it does not prove |
|---|---|---|---|
| APRA CPS 234 | APRA-regulated entities need a systematic program to test information-security controls; testing must be appropriately skilled and functionally independent | Validate selected technical controls and attack paths, then provide findings and remediation evidence | That an annual pentest alone satisfies CPS 234 |
| Privacy Act and NDB scheme | APP 11 requires reasonable security steps; the NDB scheme requires notice of eligible breaches likely to cause serious harm | Identify technical paths that could expose personal information and support risk reduction | Legal compliance or prevention of every data breach |
| ASD Essential Eight | A prioritized mitigation and maturity model | Test whether selected mitigations resist defined attack paths in the scoped environment | An official Essential Eight maturity assessment by itself |
| PCI DSS 4.0.1 | Requirement 11.4 contains internal and external penetration-testing requirements for applicable cardholder-data environments | Produce scoped testing, segmentation evidence where relevant, remediation, and retesting | Compliance with requirements outside the tested scope |
| ISO/IEC 27001:2022 | Risk-based information-security management and control assurance | Supply technical evidence for risk treatment and control review | That certification is achieved merely by completing a pentest |
APRA CPS 234 does not explicitly say every regulated entity must buy an annual penetration test. It requires systematic testing of information-security controls at a nature and frequency commensurate with threats, asset criticality, consequences, exposure, and change; it also requires appropriately skilled and functionally independent specialists. The testing program must be reviewed at least annually. Read APRA's current CPS 234 standard page.
The ASD Essential Eight is a baseline mitigation model, not a penetration-testing methodology. A pentest may test whether particular controls can be bypassed in a defined scenario, while an Essential Eight assessment evaluates implementation against the maturity model. One should not be mislabeled as the other.
Critical infrastructure owners have a separate layer. Under the Security of Critical Infrastructure Act 2018 (SOCI), responsible entities, depending on asset class, must provide information to the Register of Critical Infrastructure Assets, report cyber incidents that affect essential services to ASD's Australian Cyber Security Centre, and adopt and comply with a written risk management program. Assets declared Systems of National Significance can also face Enhanced Cyber Security Obligations, which include vulnerability assessments and cyber security exercises. Separately, the Cyber Security Act 2024 requires businesses with annual turnover above AUD 3 million, and responsible entities for critical infrastructure assets covered by Part 2B of SOCI, to report any ransomware or cyber extortion payment within 72 hours of making it or becoming aware of it. The obligation has applied since 30 May 2025, according to Home Affairs ransomware payment reporting guidance (checked November 2026). A pentest report can feed these programs, but it is not itself a SOCI risk management program or a government-directed assessment.
Government work adds another check. Under ASD's Infosec Registered Assessors Program (IRAP), ASD endorses individual assessors from the private and public sectors to provide independent security assessments that help Australian Government entities meet Protective Security Policy Framework requirements. An IRAP assessment is not a penetration test, and IRAP assessors do not accredit or register systems on ASD's behalf (ASD IRAP page, checked November 2026). If you sell to or operate government systems, confirm whether the buyer needs an IRAP assessment, a pentest, or both, and ask a provider to name any IRAP-endorsed assessor it would use.
For payment environments, PCI DSS 4.0.1 Requirement 11.4 includes specific internal and external penetration-testing requirements, including testing after significant changes in applicable circumstances. Confirm scope, frequency, segmentation testing, tester independence, and evidence with the organization's Qualified Security Assessor (QSA) or responsible assessor.
A report should let leadership make a risk decision and let engineers reproduce and fix the problem. At minimum, look for:
Use a sample deliverable to test whether findings are decision-ready. DeepStrike's penetration-testing report guide explains the difference between an executive summary, technical finding detail, remediation guidance, and verification status.
Not for every organization under a single nationwide rule. Requirements depend on sector, contract, system, and framework. PCI DSS contains explicit penetration-testing requirements for applicable cardholder-data environments. APRA CPS 234 requires systematic information-security control testing but does not explicitly mandate the same annual pentest for every entity. Legal and compliance teams should interpret the requirements that apply to the actual environment.
Use a risk- and change-driven cadence. A yearly point-in-time test is a common baseline, but high-change applications may justify release-triggered or recurring testing. Test after material architectural changes, new internet exposure, major authentication changes, significant cloud migrations, or when a contract or standard requires it. Frequency should follow asset criticality, threat change, and the decisions the evidence must support.
Price follows scope and consultant effort. A small, well-defined target costs less than a multi-role application, large API estate, internal network, cloud environment, or red-team exercise. Public provider figures are useful only with their assumptions. Compare quotes using the same assets, roles, access, testing depth, reporting, scheduling, and retesting terms.
Company accreditation assesses an organization's processes and ability to deliver a defined service discipline. Individual certifications assess a practitioner's knowledge or practical skills. OSCP is not the same as CREST company accreditation, and a certified individual does not automatically make the employer accredited. Verify both the company's live directory entry and the assigned testers' relevant experience.
An external test starts from the internet and evaluates exposed assets such as applications, APIs, VPNs, and services. An internal test begins from an assumed foothold or trusted network position and examines privilege escalation, lateral movement, identity controls, segmentation, and access to sensitive systems. Many organizations need both, but the order and depth should follow the threat model.
Neither is automatically better. A one-off test is efficient for a stable scope and point-in-time decision. PTaaS is useful when teams want an ongoing portal, collaboration, finding triage, and repeated testing around product change. Ask how much manual tester effort is included, what triggers testing, how scope changes, and what retesting and final evidence are delivered.
DeepStrike, the publisher of this guide, is one option for fast-moving product and engineering teams that value manual-first testing, PTaaS workflow, remediation collaboration, and retesting. CyberCX and Thales/Tesserent are stronger fits for many large, multi-service enterprise programs; Secolve stands out for OT; elttam for deep technical assessment; and Australian specialists such as Project Black or the CREST-accredited White Rook Cyber may better satisfy particular local procurement gates. If your requirement extends past offensive testing into managed detection, consulting, and defensive coverage, our list of the top cybersecurity companies in Australia covers the wider local market.
Do not choose from the list alone. Turn your risk question into a common scope, run every bidder through SCOPE-R, compare the assigned people and written terms, and resolve location, accreditation, data, safety, reporting, and retesting requirements before price.
Ready to compare an authorized application, API, cloud, mobile, network, AI, or recurring testing scope? Ask DeepStrike for a scope-specific proposal and apply the same evidence standard you would use for every provider in this guide.
Mohammed Khalil is a Cybersecurity Architect at DeepStrike, specializing in advanced penetration testing and offensive security operations. With certifications including CISSP, OSCP, and OSWE, he has led numerous red team engagements, focusing on cloud security, application vulnerabilities, and adversary emulation. His work involves dissecting complex attack chains and developing resilient defense strategies for clients in the finance, healthcare, and technology sectors.

Stay secure with DeepStrike penetration testing services. Reach out for a quote or customized technical proposal today
Contact Us