September 24, 2025
Updated: November 1, 2026
Evidence-led 2026 buyer guide comparing 20 penetration-testing providers serving India.
Mohammed Khalil

This guide compares 20 penetration testing providers serving buyers in India, starting with DeepStrike, the publisher, followed by SecureLayer7, Astra Security, ISECURION, Qualysec, AppSecure, Indusface, and 13 more. Each entry summarises the provider's public offering from its official website, its India presence, and whether it appears on CERT-In's published list of empanelled information security auditing organisations (checked November 2026). The order is a procurement aid, not an independent certification of quality; buyer fit depends on scope, sector, data handling, tester expertise, and engagement model.
Comparing providers beyond India? Our worldwide list of penetration testing companies covers firms that deliver testing across regions.
DeepStrike, the publisher of this guide, sells penetration testing services and is included in this list. Weigh our entry the way you would any vendor's description of its own service. No provider paid for inclusion. Buyers should apply their own scope, technical, legal, sector, procurement, and contracting checks.
A company did not qualify merely because it appeared in search results, used “VAPT” in its marketing, or offered a vulnerability scanner. The 19 other providers were selected on evidence of an active service, material penetration testing scope, and India relevance, and every entry was rechecked against the provider's official website and CERT-In's published empanelment list in November 2026. DeepStrike is included as the publisher, and its entry uses the same structure.
For web-application work, the OWASP Web Security Testing Guide is a useful reference framework, but naming OWASP does not prove that a provider executes a thorough engagement.
NIST SP 800-115 similarly frames technical security testing around planning, execution, analysis, and mitigation. Buyers should still inspect the proposed methodology, assigned team, rules of engagement, evidence, and deliverables for their own scope.
| Criterion | Weight | What earns credit | Evidence accepted | What does not count |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Human testing depth | 25 | Manual assessment, exploit validation, business-logic testing, or accountable human sign-off beyond scanner output | Current first-party service/methodology pages and reproducible engagement details | Scanner-only coverage, a bare “manual” label, or framework-name dropping |
| India delivery fit | 15 | Verified India office/entity, India-specific service, or clearly documented current delivery relevance | Current official contact, legal, service, or company pages | Headquarters prestige, unsupported market claims, or a dead route |
| Technical scope | 15 | Current evidence for the specific asset classes and testing disciplines offered | Current scope-specific first-party service pages | Broad “cybersecurity” language without material pentest scope |
| Methodology transparency | 10 | Specific process, testing steps, methods, or explicitly evidenced standards | Current methodology/process pages and scope documents | Standard logos or framework names without evidence of use |
| Reporting, remediation, and retesting | 10 | Reproducible findings, remediation support, and defined fix-validation evidence | Current deliverable, report, remediation, or retest descriptions | Assuming missing public terms are unavailable or treating a report alone as closure |
| Delivery and collaboration workflow | 10 | Clear project, PTaaS, continuous, portal, integration, or communication workflow | Current service/workflow/platform descriptions | Treating platform ownership itself as a quality score |
| Verifiable credentials | 5 | Current issuer-backed credentials or accreditations with clear owner and scope | Current issuer or authoritative source evidence | Logo-only, stale-version, self-awarded, or ambiguous certification claims |
| Independent reputation evidence | 5 | Credible, current third-party evidence only when materially relevant | Independent sources with identifiable methodology and date | Provider-owned testimonials, unsupported awards, or customer-count marketing |
| Evidence freshness and transparency | 5 | Current, specific, traceable evidence with a recorded access date | Reopened source pages and dated authority documents | Undated snippets, stale cached claims, or unverifiable summaries |
The framework is an editorial decision aid, not an industry certification. DeepStrike is listed first as the publisher; positions #2–#20 reflect the evidence available on the review date. No numerical company scores are published because that would imply more precision than the source record supports.
| Company | India presence (per official site) | Published pentest scope | CERT-In empanelment list (Nov. 2026) | Best-fit buyer |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1. DeepStrike | Remote delivery; HQ Newark, Delaware | Applications, cloud, and infrastructure | Not found | Engineering teams needing remediation collaboration |
| 2. SecureLayer7 | Team in Pune and Austin | Web, API, mobile, cloud, AD, AI, IoT, OT, SAP, red team | Not found | App, API, and cloud teams wanting exploit evidence |
| 3. Astra Security | Empanelled entity in Chandigarh (Czar Securities) | Web, API, and cloud via PTaaS platform | Listed (Czar Securities Pvt. Ltd.) | Teams wanting platform-led pentesting |
| 4. ISECURION | HQ Bengaluru; Kolkata, Mumbai, Ahmedabad, Noida | Web, mobile, network, cloud, red team, IoT, ICS | Listed | Buyers needing empanelled VAPT with a retest |
| 5. Qualysec | Bhubaneswar and Bengaluru | Applications, AI, IoT and medical devices, cloud, network | Not found | Product and device makers |
| 6. AppSecure | No Indian address; office in Singapore | Web, mobile, API, network, IoT, continuous, red team | Not found | Teams wanting continuous offensive testing |
| 7. Indusface | Vadodara, Bengaluru, Navi Mumbai, Delhi | Web, API, and mobile apps with DAST | Listed | App owners wanting testing plus scanning |
| 8. WeSecureApp | Hyderabad and Mumbai; HQ Texas | Apps, network, cloud, red team, social engineering | Listed (Tek Cube Pvt. Ltd.) | Buyers needing VAPT plus CERT-In audits |
| 9. Payatu | HQ Pune | Web, mobile, cloud, IoT, hardware, OT/ICS, AI/ML, red team | Listed | Product, IoT, and critical-infrastructure teams |
| 10. TÜV SÜD | Testing lab in Mumbai | Web, network, mobile, code review, red team | Listed (TUV-SUD South Asia) | Enterprises wanting a large assurance group |
| 11. EC-Council Global Services | No Indian address found; remote delivery | Network, web, and mobile VAPT; remote pentesting | Not found | Buyers wanting remote multi-scope testing |
| 12. Kratikal | HQ Noida; Mumbai, Pune, Bengaluru | Apps, network, cloud, IoT, OT, AI, red team | Listed | Buyers wanting VAPT plus compliance support |
| 13. eSec Forte | HQ Gurugram; Mumbai | VAPT, red team, cloud, OT, plus SOC and forensics | Listed | Enterprises wanting testing plus SOC/IR |
| 14. Wattlecorp | Bangalore and Kozhikode (phone contacts) | Web, mobile, API, network, IoT, ICS/SCADA, code review | Not found | SME and web/API product teams |
| 15. Netrika | Gurugram and New Delhi | Network, application, and web VAPT | Listed | Buyers wanting VAPT plus risk consulting |
| 16. CyberOps Infosec | Jaipur | Web, mobile, desktop, network, cloud, IoT | Not found | SMBs needing baseline VAPT |
| 17. Appknox | Bengaluru | Mobile apps and their APIs | Not found | Mobile-first product teams |
| 18. KiwiQA | No Indian address published | Security testing within QA services | Not found | QA-led teams |
| 19. TAC Security | Mumbai, Delhi, Mohali, Pune | Application testing via ESOF platform and services | Listed (TAC InfoSec Limited) | Platform-based vulnerability management programs |
| 20. Secuneus | Jalandhar, Punjab | Managed web application pentesting | Not found | Small, tightly scoped web assessments |

Public offering: DeepStrike's penetration testing services describe human-led testing across applications, cloud environments, and infrastructure, supported by a findings and collaboration platform. Its public process covers planning, reconnaissance, vulnerability discovery, controlled exploitation, reporting, and technical support. Published reports include reproduction steps, remediation guidance, and root-cause information; the proposal should define exact coverage and commercial terms.
India relevance: Founded in 2016, DeepStrike LLC is headquartered in Newark, Delaware, has 11–50 employees, and also publishes a business address in Dubai, UAE (IFZA Business Park). It delivers testing remotely for Indian clients; define tester locations, permitted subcontracting, and data-handling restrictions in the engagement agreement.
Team certifications: OSCP, OSWE, OSEP, OSWP, GXPN, GWAPT, eCPPT, eMAPT, eWPT, CREST CPSA, CRTP, CRTE, and Microsoft Azure Security Engineer Associate, as shown on DeepStrike's services page.
Official sources: Pricing , Contact Us
Buyer fit: Engineering teams that need application, cloud, or infrastructure testing with direct remediation collaboration.
| Documented strengths | Limits and buying considerations |
|---|---|
| Human-led testing with reproduction evidence, root-cause information, and remediation guidance. | The service description is not an independently measured quality comparison. Assess the assigned team and a relevant sample report. |
| The published Basic plan lists Slack collaboration, customizable reports, and 12 months of remediation retesting. | No numeric price is displayed on the pricing page. Basic is a one-shot test; recurring coverage belongs to a different plan, with contract-specific terms. |
| Team certifications shown on the services page include OSCP, OSWE, OSEP, OSWP, GXPN, GWAPT, eCPPT, eMAPT, eWPT, CREST CPSA, CRTP, CRTE, and Microsoft Azure Security Engineer Associate. | These are individual tester credentials, not a company-level accreditation; ask which certified testers will be assigned to your engagement. |

Public offering: SecureLayer7 offers penetration testing of web, mobile, API, network, cloud (AWS, Azure, GCP, and Kubernetes), Active Directory, AI/LLM, IoT, OT/ICS, SAP, smart contract, and thick-client targets, plus red teaming and source code review. It describes a find, probe, and exploit process and states that each finding includes proof of compromise, an evidence trail, a short attack video, and a fix path, with retesting included.
India relevance: SecureLayer7 states that it was founded in Pune in 2012 and that its team works from Pune and Austin, Texas. Its contact page refers to CERT-In, but we did not find SecureLayer7 on CERT-In's published list of empanelled information security auditing organisations in November 2026; request the empanelment evidence if your engagement requires it, and define tester locations and data handling in the agreement.
Certifications: SecureLayer7 lists CREST accreditation (company and testers), an independent SOC 2 Type II audit, and ISO/IEC 27001.
Official sources: https://securelayer7.net/our-services; https://securelayer7.net/contact-us
Buyer fit: Application, API, and cloud teams that want exploit evidence and included retesting from a team with Pune and Austin operations.
| Documented strengths | Limits and buying considerations |
|---|---|
| Published scope is broad, from web and API testing to OT/ICS, SAP, and smart contracts, plus red teaming. | Breadth does not show depth on your stack; ask for testers with experience in your specific asset types. |
| Findings are described with proof of compromise, an attack video, and a fix path; retesting is stated as included. | Confirm the number of retests, the retest window, and which findings qualify in the proposal. |

Public offering: Astra Security offers a pentest-as-a-service platform that combines hacker-style manual penetration testing with automated scanning of web applications, APIs, and cloud configurations across AWS, Azure, and GCP. The platform adds vulnerability management, real-time collaboration with pentesters, and Jira, Slack, and CI/CD integrations; separate DAST, API security, and cloud scanning products are also offered.
India relevance: Astra's website names ASTRA IT, Inc. as its legal entity, and CERT-In's published list of empanelled information security auditing organisations (checked November 2026) includes M/s Astra Security (Czar Securities Pvt. Ltd.) with a Chandigarh address. Confirm which entity contracts, where testers are based, and how platform data is stored in the agreement.
Certifications: CERT-In's published empanelment list includes Astra Security (Czar Securities Pvt. Ltd.).
Official sources: https://www.getastra.com/ptaas; https://www.getastra.com/contact-us
Buyer fit: Engineering teams that want manual pentesting delivered through a platform with continuous scanning and developer-tool integrations.
| Documented strengths | Limits and buying considerations |
|---|---|
| Manual pentesting is combined with continuous scanning, a vulnerability dashboard, and Jira, Slack, and CI/CD integrations. | Separate scanner output from manual findings in the proposal so the human testing effort is clear. |
| Listed on CERT-In's empanelment list under Czar Securities Pvt. Ltd. | The website's legal entity is a US company; confirm which entity signs the contract if empanelment matters. |

Public offering: ISECURION offers vulnerability assessment and penetration testing of web and mobile applications, networks, and cloud environments, plus red team assessments, IoT and industrial control system testing, cryptocurrency exchange and smart contract assessments, and breach attack simulation. Its stated deliverables are an executive summary, a technical report with severity-rated findings, proof-of-concept evidence, and remediation guidance for each vulnerability, followed by a remediation-verification retest.
India relevance: ISECURION lists its corporate office in Bengaluru, further offices in Kolkata, Mumbai, Ahmedabad, and Noida, and a US address in Schaumburg, Illinois. CERT-In's published list of empanelled information security auditing organisations (checked November 2026) includes ISECURION Technology & Consulting Pvt Ltd; define tester locations and data handling in the agreement.
Certifications: ISECURION states that it is CERT-In empanelled and ISO 27001:2022 certified, and shows tester certification logos including OSCP, CEH, CISSP, and CISA.
Official sources: https://isecurion.com/technical-services/vulnerability-assessment-penetration-testing.html; https://isecurion.com/contact-us.html
Buyer fit: Indian organisations that need CERT-In-empanelled VAPT with a defined report structure and a fix-verification retest.
| Documented strengths | Limits and buying considerations |
|---|---|
| Deliverables are specified: executive summary, severity-rated technical findings, proof of concept, remediation guidance, and a retest. | Published timelines (for example 5 to 10 business days for a web application) are indicative; confirm effort for your scope. |
| CERT-In empanelment is confirmed on CERT-In's list, and ISO 27001:2022 certification is stated. | Empanelment covers the organisation, not a specific team; ask who will be assigned. |

Public offering: Qualysec offers penetration testing of web, mobile, API, desktop, and enterprise applications, source code review, AI application and agent testing, IoT, embedded, medical and automotive device testing, cloud (AWS, Azure, GCP), and internal and external networks. It offers sample reports, and its dashboard supports tracking fixes, assigning them to developers, and requesting retests.
India relevance: Qualysec lists offices in Bhubaneswar and Bengaluru. We did not find Qualysec on CERT-In's published list of empanelled information security auditing organisations in November 2026; if empanelment is required, confirm it before contracting, and define data handling in the agreement.
Certifications: Qualysec states that it is CREST accredited for penetration testing and lists ISO 27001, ISO 9001:2015, and ISO 13485 certifications.
Official sources: https://qualysec.com/advanced-penetration-testing-services/; https://qualysec.com/contact-us/
Buyer fit: Product companies, including medical-device and IoT makers, that want application, device, and cloud testing from an India-based team.
| Documented strengths | Limits and buying considerations |
|---|---|
| Published scope extends to AI agents, medical and automotive devices, and IoT alongside applications and cloud. | The methodology is not described in detail on the site; request a test plan and sample report for your asset type. |
| The dashboard supports fix assignment and retest requests; CREST and ISO certifications are stated. | Not found on CERT-In's empanelment list in November 2026, which matters where an empanelled auditor is mandated. |

Public offering: AppSecure offers pentesting as a service for web, mobile, API, thick-client, network, and IoT targets, plus continuous penetration testing and red teaming as a service. It describes a mix of automated and manual testing by ethical hackers, reports with an executive summary, severity-rated findings, evidence, and recommendations, and post-test support for validating fixes, with retesting described as optional.
India relevance: AppSecure lists its office at 160 Robinson Road, Singapore, and publishes India city service pages, but we found no Indian address on its site. We did not find AppSecure on CERT-In's published list of empanelled information security auditing organisations in November 2026; confirm the contracting entity, tester locations, and data handling in the agreement.
Certifications: AppSecure lists a CREST certificate and a CSRO licence for penetration testing (Singapore's licensing regime).
Official sources: https://www.appsecure.security/pentesting-as-a-service; https://www.appsecure.security/contact
Buyer fit: Technology companies that want recurring or continuous offensive testing and are comfortable contracting with a Singapore-based provider.
| Documented strengths | Limits and buying considerations |
|---|---|
| Published services include PTaaS, continuous testing, and red teaming as a service, with a CREST certificate listed. | Retesting is labelled optional; agree the retest count and terms in the proposal. |
| Reports are described as including an executive summary, severity ratings, evidence, and recommendations. | No Indian office is published and no CERT-In empanelment was found; check this against your procurement rules. |

Public offering: Indusface offers fully managed manual penetration testing of web applications, APIs (REST, SOAP, GraphQL, WebSocket, and AI/LLM endpoints), and iOS, Android, and hybrid mobile apps, delivered on the same platform as its DAST scanner and AI-assisted testing. It states that certified pentesters verify AI-identified findings and lists report contents including proof of vulnerability, parameters tested, risk scores, and remediation recommendations.
India relevance: Indusface lists offices in Vadodara, Bengaluru, Navi Mumbai, and Delhi, plus Dallas, Texas. CERT-In's published list of empanelled information security auditing organisations (checked November 2026) includes Indusface Pvt. Ltd. (Vadodara); define tester locations and data handling in the agreement.
Certifications: Indusface displays CERT-In, ISO 27001, SOC 2 Type II, PCI DSS, and HITRUST CSF badges on its site.
Official sources: https://www.indusface.com/products/indusface-was/penetration-testing/; https://www.indusface.com/contact-us/
Buyer fit: Application owners who want manual pentesting tied to ongoing scanning and virtual patching on one platform.
| Documented strengths | Limits and buying considerations |
|---|---|
| Manual testing covers web, API, and mobile apps, with published report contents and a combined scanning platform. | The page does not describe retest terms; confirm how fixes are revalidated. |
| CERT-In empanelment is confirmed on CERT-In's list. | The published pentest page centres on applications; confirm coverage if you also need network or cloud testing. |

Public offering: WeSecureApp offers web, mobile, and API penetration testing, network, wireless, VoIP, and device VAPT, cloud pentesting and auditing, red team and assumed-breach assessments, social engineering, ransomware simulation, secure code review, and threat modelling, including a pentesting-as-a-service model. It also runs a CERT-In audit services line and offers a sample report.
India relevance: WeSecureApp lists its headquarters in Plano (Dallas), Texas, and offices in Hyderabad, Mumbai, the UK, and Singapore. CERT-In's published list of empanelled information security auditing organisations (checked November 2026) includes Tek Cube Pvt. Ltd. (WeSecureApp), Hyderabad; confirm which entity contracts and define tester locations and data handling in the agreement.
Certifications: CERT-In's published empanelment list includes Tek Cube Pvt. Ltd. (WeSecureApp).
Official sources: https://wesecureapp.com/pentesting-as-a-service/; https://wesecureapp.com/contact/
Buyer fit: Organisations that need broad VAPT plus CERT-In audit work, with offices in both India and the US.
| Documented strengths | Limits and buying considerations |
|---|---|
| The service catalogue covers applications, networks, cloud, red teaming, social engineering, and code review. | The site gives little detail on methodology and retesting; request the test plan, a sample report, and retest terms. |
| Empanelled under Tek Cube Pvt. Ltd. on CERT-In's list. | Compliance logos on the site are presented as standards it helps with, not as its own certifications; verify any you rely on. |

Public offering: Payatu offers web, mobile, and cloud security testing, secure code review, product and IoT security testing, AI/ML security audits, OT/ICS and critical-infrastructure assessments, red team assessments, and a SOC service, supported by a hardware lab. It also operates a certification body, an inspection body, and GRC services, and describes its testing as research-led.
India relevance: Payatu lists its India headquarters in Viman Nagar, Pune (Payatu Security Consulting Pvt Ltd), and entities in the USA, Australia, Dubai, and the Netherlands. CERT-In's published list of empanelled information security auditing organisations (checked November 2026) includes Payatu Security Consulting Private Limited; define tester locations and data handling in the agreement.
Certifications: Payatu lists CERT-In empanelment, CREST accreditation, ISO/IEC 27001:2022, ISO 9001, and ISO/IEC 17025 for its testing lab.
Official sources: https://payatu.ai/; https://payatu.ai/contact-us
Buyer fit: Product, IoT, embedded, and critical-infrastructure teams that need research-led testing with hardware lab capability.
| Documented strengths | Limits and buying considerations |
|---|---|
| Published services include IoT, hardware, OT/ICS, and AI/ML security alongside application and cloud testing; ISO/IEC 17025 lab accreditation is stated. | Retest terms are not published; define them in the proposal. |
| CERT-In empanelment is confirmed on CERT-In's list, and CREST accreditation is stated. | Payatu also operates certification and inspection bodies; if you use those services, agree how testing independence is handled. |

Public offering: TÜV SÜD South Asia offers web application security testing (black, grey, and white box) combining manual and automated testing, internal and external network VAPT referencing NIST and OSSTMM, mobile application VAPT, source code review, red and purple teaming, and API, IoT, and cloud application security testing. Reports follow a standard TÜV SÜD format covering the testing performed, vulnerabilities found, and recommended fixes, and a follow-up test can verify corrective actions.
India relevance: TÜV SÜD states that its penetration testing laboratory is in Mumbai. CERT-In's published list of empanelled information security auditing organisations (checked November 2026) includes TUV-SUD South Asia Pvt. Ltd. (Pune); define tester locations and data handling in the agreement.
Certifications: TÜV SÜD describes itself as a CERT-In empanelled auditor and states that its team includes certified penetration testers.
Official sources: https://www.tuvsud.com/en-in/landing/asmea/penetration-testing; https://www.tuvsud.com/en-in/services/cyber-security/expert-services/penetration-testing
Buyer fit: Enterprises that want penetration testing from a large testing, inspection, and certification group with an India-based lab.
| Documented strengths | Limits and buying considerations |
|---|---|
| Published web, network, mobile, code review, and red team services, with NIST and OSSTMM referenced for network testing. | A large assurance organisation may follow a more formal engagement process; confirm timelines and points of contact. |
| CERT-In empanelment is confirmed on CERT-In's list, and follow-up testing to verify fixes is offered. | Follow-up testing is described as an option rather than included; agree retest terms in the contract. |

Public offering: EC-Council Global Services (EGS) offers vulnerability assessment and penetration testing of network infrastructure, web applications, and mobile applications, plus remote penetration testing, intelligence-led pentesting, compromise assessment, secure code review, and vulnerability management. It describes a flexible approach tailored to the client's environment and goals.
India relevance: We found no Indian office address on the EGS site; the location it highlights is a SOC facility in Malaysia, and it states that it is an approved vendor of CyberSecurity Malaysia. We did not find EGS on CERT-In's published list of empanelled information security auditing organisations in November 2026; confirm the contracting entity, remote-delivery model, and data handling in the agreement.
Official sources: https://egs.eccouncil.org/services/vulnerability-assessment-and-penetration-testing/; https://egs.eccouncil.org/contact-us/
Buyer fit: Organisations that want remote, multi-scope testing from the services arm of a cybersecurity training and certification body.
| Documented strengths | Limits and buying considerations |
|---|---|
| Published services span network, web, and mobile VAPT, remote and intelligence-led pentesting, and compromise assessment. | The VAPT page gives little detail on methodology, reporting, or retesting; request a sample report. |
| Approved vendor status with CyberSecurity Malaysia is stated. | No Indian office or CERT-In empanelment was found; check this against your procurement rules. |

Public offering: Kratikal's VAPT service covers application security testing, network and cloud penetration testing, IoT, OT, and medical device security testing, AI pentesting, red teaming, secure code review, threat modelling, and software composition analysis. It also offers AutoSecT, an AI-driven pentest and vulnerability management platform for web, mobile, API, cloud, and network assets, and compliance support for ISO 27001, SOC 2, RBI, SEBI, and DPDP.
India relevance: Kratikal lists its headquarters in Noida, offices in Mumbai, Pune, and Bengaluru, and a US office in Cupertino, California. CERT-In's published list of empanelled information security auditing organisations (checked November 2026) includes Kratikal Tech Limited (Noida); define tester locations and data handling in the agreement.
Certifications: CERT-In's published empanelment list includes Kratikal Tech Limited.
Official sources: https://kratikal.com/vapt-services; https://kratikal.com/contact-us
Buyer fit: Indian organisations that want VAPT combined with compliance support for frameworks such as RBI, SEBI, and DPDP.
| Documented strengths | Limits and buying considerations |
|---|---|
| A broad VAPT catalogue plus a vulnerability management platform and compliance support. | The site does not state the manual versus automated split; ask how much of the work is tester-led. |
| CERT-In empanelment is confirmed on CERT-In's list. | Retest terms are not published; confirm them in the proposal. |

Public offering: eSec Forte offers security assessments including VAPT and red teaming across application, API, network, cloud (AWS, Azure, GCP), and OT environments, alongside managed SOC, compliance management, digital forensics, and incident response. It also offers NxSAM, a platform for managing the vulnerability assessment lifecycle, and DRONA digital forensics hardware.
India relevance: eSec Forte lists its headquarters in Udyog Vihar, Gurugram, with offices in Mumbai, Singapore, and Wilmington, Delaware. CERT-In's published list of empanelled information security auditing organisations (checked November 2026) includes eSec Forte Technologies Pvt. Ltd.; define tester locations and data handling in the agreement.
Certifications: eSec Forte states that it is a CERT-In empanelled auditor.
Official sources: https://www.esecforte.com/
Buyer fit: Enterprises, including banks, that want security testing from a provider that also offers SOC, forensics, and incident response.
| Documented strengths | Limits and buying considerations |
|---|---|
| Published services include VAPT, red teaming, OT and cloud security, plus forensics and incident response. | The home page does not describe report contents or retest terms; request a sample report. |
| CERT-In empanelment is confirmed on CERT-In's list. | When the same provider runs your SOC, agree how testing independence and findings escalation will work. |

Public offering: Wattlecorp offers VAPT for web and mobile applications, APIs, networks, wireless, IoT, and ICS/SCADA, black-box and social engineering tests, cloud application assessment, container security, and secure source code review. Its India web application testing page references the OWASP Web Security Testing Guide, OWASP Top 10, and PTES, describes risk-based manual testing, and states that reports include proof, risk ratings, and remediation guidance.
India relevance: Wattlecorp lists India locations in Bangalore and Kozhikode (Kerala) with phone contacts, alongside the US, UAE, Saudi Arabia, the UK, and Singapore, but publishes no street addresses. We did not find Wattlecorp on CERT-In's published list of empanelled information security auditing organisations in November 2026; confirm the contracting entity and define data handling in the agreement.
Official sources: https://www.wattlecorp.com/in/services/web-application-penetration-testing/; https://www.wattlecorp.com/contact/
Buyer fit: SMEs and web or API product teams that want manual application testing with multi-region support.
| Documented strengths | Limits and buying considerations |
|---|---|
| The India web application testing page names OWASP WSTG, OWASP Top 10, and PTES and describes manual exploitation. | Retesting is mentioned only as a cost factor; confirm whether it is included. |
| The service catalogue extends to ICS/SCADA, containers, and code review. | No CERT-In empanelment was found and no Indian street address is published; check both against your procurement rules. |

Public offering: Netrika Consulting offers security testing (VAPT) for networks, applications, and web security within an information security practice that also covers ISMS, DPDP and GDPR compliance, vendor risk management, and digital forensics and incident response. Its wider business includes security and risk consulting, forensic investigations, due diligence, and background checks.
India relevance: Netrika lists its corporate office in Udyog Vihar, Gurugram, and its registered office in New Delhi. CERT-In's published list of empanelled information security auditing organisations (checked November 2026) includes Netrika Consulting India Pvt. Ltd.; define tester locations and data handling in the agreement.
Certifications: Netrika displays CERT-In empanelment and ISO/IEC 27001:2022 certification on its site.
Official sources: https://netrika.com/services/information-security/security-testing-vapt-network-application-and-web-security; https://netrika.com/contact-us
Buyer fit: Organisations that want VAPT alongside risk consulting, investigations, or DPDP compliance work.
| Documented strengths | Limits and buying considerations |
|---|---|
| CERT-In empanelment is confirmed on CERT-In's list, and ISO/IEC 27001:2022 certification is shown. | The site gives little detail on testing methodology; request the test plan and a sample report. |
| Testing sits within a broader risk, forensics, and investigations business. | Confirm the size and experience of the technical testing team for your scope, and the retest terms. |

Public offering: CyberOps offers penetration testing of web, mobile, and desktop applications, networks, and cloud servers, plus VAPT, source code review, and IoT device assessment, and lists ISO 27001, SOC 2, and PCI DSS compliance services.
India relevance: CyberOps lists its office in Mansarovar, Jaipur, Rajasthan. We did not find CyberOps on CERT-In's published list of empanelled information security auditing organisations in November 2026; define tester locations and data handling in the agreement.
Official sources: https://cyberops.in/vapt; https://cyberops.in/contact
Buyer fit: Small and mid-sized Indian organisations that need baseline VAPT across applications and infrastructure.
| Documented strengths | Limits and buying considerations |
|---|---|
| Published scope covers applications, networks, cloud servers, IoT, and source code review. | The site does not describe methodology, the manual versus automated split, reporting, or retesting; request them in writing. |
| A Rajasthan-based provider that also offers compliance services. | No CERT-In empanelment was found; check this against your procurement rules. |

Public offering: Appknox offers a mobile application security platform with binary SAST, DAST on real Android and iOS devices, API security testing, and SBOM analysis, plus expert-led penetration testing on each release and app store monitoring (Storeknox). Findings are mapped to standards including the OWASP Mobile Top 10, OWASP MASVS and MASTG, and the OWASP API Top 10.
India relevance: Appknox (XYSec Labs, Inc.) lists an India office in Bengaluru alongside addresses in Newark, Delaware, and Singapore. We did not find Appknox on CERT-In's published list of empanelled information security auditing organisations in November 2026; define tester locations and data handling in the agreement.
Official sources: https://www.appknox.com/penetration-testing; https://www.appknox.com/contact
Buyer fit: Mobile-first product teams that want automated mobile scanning on every build plus expert penetration testing.
| Documented strengths | Limits and buying considerations |
|---|---|
| A mobile-specific platform covering binaries, real-device DAST, APIs, SBOM, and store monitoring, with expert pentesting. | Coverage is mobile-focused; web, network, or cloud testing would need separate scoping. |
| Findings are mapped to OWASP MASVS/MASTG and other standards. | Separate automated platform results from manual pentest findings, and confirm retest terms in the proposal. |

Public offering: KiwiQA is a software testing and quality assurance company whose services include security testing: vulnerability scanning, penetration testing, risk assessment, and security auditing for web and mobile applications, APIs, networks, and cloud. Its main business covers automation, performance, mobile, and manual testing.
India relevance: KiwiQA describes its services as delivered in Australia, India, and the US; its website does not publish an Indian street address. We did not find KiwiQA on CERT-In's published list of empanelled information security auditing organisations in November 2026; confirm the contracting entity and define data handling in the agreement.
Official sources: https://www.kiwiqa.com/security-testing-services/; https://www.kiwiqa.com/
Buyer fit: QA-led teams that want security testing alongside functional, automation, and performance testing.
| Documented strengths | Limits and buying considerations |
|---|---|
| Security testing is offered within a broader QA service set. | The site gives little detail on penetration testing methodology or tester credentials; request both. |
| Combined QA and security testing can suit release-focused teams. | No CERT-In empanelment or Indian address was found; check both against your procurement rules. |

Public offering: TAC Security offers ESOF, a risk-based vulnerability management and application security platform with automated dynamic, static, and manual application security testing, plus professional services covering manual application penetration testing, business logic assessment, and vulnerability assessment. Group companies cover smart contract audits (Cyberscope), ioXt IoT certification, and SOC 2 compliance (Socify).
India relevance: TAC Security lists Asia-Pacific offices in Mumbai, Delhi, Mohali (Chandigarh), and Pune, and US offices in San Francisco and Albuquerque. CERT-In's published list of empanelled information security auditing organisations (checked November 2026) includes TAC InfoSec Limited (Mohali); define tester locations and data handling in the agreement.
Certifications: TAC Security displays CERT-In, CREST PT, ioXt, ISO 17025, and SOC 2 badges on its site.
Official sources: https://tacsecurity.com/; https://tacsecurity.com/contact-us/
Buyer fit: Organisations running platform-based vulnerability management that also want optional manual application testing.
| Documented strengths | Limits and buying considerations |
|---|---|
| CERT-In empanelment is confirmed on CERT-In's list; ESOF combines automated and manual application testing. | Platform output and manual professional services are separate; specify the manual effort in the scope. |
| Professional services include manual application pentesting and business logic assessment. | The site focuses on applications; confirm coverage and retest terms if you need network or cloud testing. |

Public offering: Secuneus Tech offers a fixed-price, seven-day managed pentesting service for web applications, performed by its security consultants, plus network security, source code review, and iOS and Android app assessments. It also offers compliance support, malware analysis, data recovery, and cybersecurity training.
India relevance: Secuneus Tech lists its address in Rajinder Nagar, Jalandhar, Punjab. We did not find Secuneus on CERT-In's published list of empanelled information security auditing organisations in November 2026; define tester locations and data handling in the agreement.
Certifications: Secuneus states that its team holds certifications including CEH, CompTIA, and OSCP.
Official sources: https://www.secuneus.com/
Buyer fit: Smaller organisations that need a tightly scoped web application test on a fixed timeline.
| Documented strengths | Limits and buying considerations |
|---|---|
| A fixed-price, seven-day web application assessment performed by its security consultants. | Training is a large part of the business; confirm the size and seniority of the testing team. |
| Scope also includes network, source code, and mobile app assessments. | Report contents and retest terms are not published; request a sample report and retest terms. |
An India-headquartered provider can simplify local contracting, time-zone alignment, onsite work, and some tender requirements. A global provider may be attractive when the engagement needs niche expertise, cross-border program consistency, a particular collaboration model, or specialist testing depth. Neither model is inherently better.
Compare who will actually perform the work, where credentials and evidence will be processed, whether subcontractors are involved, how the team collaborates during testing, and which legal entity signs the contract. DeepStrike's buyer-selection guide provides a deeper evidence question set for the vendors that survive the first shortlist.
Start with assets, trust boundaries, authentication roles, sensitive workflows, production constraints, and business impact. A broad corporate service catalog is useful only when the proposed team has relevant experience with the actual scope.
For internet-facing products, web application penetration testing should address authorization, authentication, sessions, input handling, business logic, and controlled exploit validation not merely common scanner findings.
For Android and iOS products, mobile application penetration testing should cover the application binary, local storage, transport, authentication, platform behavior, and in-scope backend interactions.
Cloud-heavy organizations should compare cloud penetration testing experience against their actual provider and architecture. Identity, permissions, trust relationships, exposed services, containers, and configuration paths can matter as much as host vulnerabilities.
Fast-moving teams may prefer continuous penetration testing when releases and infrastructure changes make a single annual snapshot inadequate for their risk model. Recurring delivery still requires defined authorization, scope, stop conditions, and human judgment.
Organizations deploying agentic or LLM-enabled applications may need a specialist AI and LLM penetration testing scope covering connected tools, data boundaries, authorization, prompt-mediated actions, and acceptable test behavior.
Vulnerability scanning is primarily a coverage mechanism: tools identify likely weaknesses, versions, signatures, and configuration problems at scale. Penetration testing adds authorized human analysis and controlled exploitation to determine whether weaknesses are practically exploitable, can be chained, or create meaningful impact within the agreed scope.
Automation is useful inside a pentest; the distinction is not “tools versus no tools.” It is whether skilled people define the attack path, test business logic, validate findings, control risk, and explain impact. The manual vs automated penetration testing guide explores that boundary in more depth.
Be cautious when a low-cost “pentest” is only a branded scanner export. Ask for the methodology, assigned roles, manual effort, evidence examples, severity logic, remediation guidance, limitations, and retest process before treating two proposals as comparable.
Indian requirements vary by entity, sector, tender, system, and current rule. A penetration test can support assurance, but it does not by itself establish legal or regulatory compliance.
CERT-In's Comprehensive Cyber Security Audit Policy Guidelines, Version 1.0 dated July 25, 2025, govern CERT-In-empanelled information-security auditing organizations and auditees. They are relevant when that audit framework applies, but they do not mean every private organization in India must use an empanelled provider for every pentest.
For entities covered by the RBI Information Technology Governance, Risk, Controls and Assurance Practices Directions, 2023, effective April 1, 2024, vulnerability assessment and penetration testing requirements are scoped to specified regulated entities and systems. Covered buyers should map the current direction to their own asset classification, independence, cadence, and remediation duties.
SEBI-regulated entities should review the current Cybersecurity and Cyber Resilience Framework and subsequent applicable circulars or FAQs rather than extrapolating a generic rule to all Indian companies.
Procurement should also address written authorization, rules of engagement, data processing, credential handling, evidence retention and deletion, subcontractors, incident escalation, testing windows, production safety, reporting, retesting, and ownership of remediation. This guide is informational and is not legal advice.
Comparable public INR pricing is not available across enough providers to support a defensible market-price table. Compare like-for-like scopes instead of headline rates.
Cost is usually driven by asset count and type, authentication roles, API and application complexity, cloud and identity scope, internal versus external access, testing depth, production constraints, onsite work, reporting needs, specialist skills, remediation support, retesting, and timeline. DeepStrike's penetration testing cost guide provides a separate scoping framework without turning this provider comparison into a universal price claim.
Common engagement models include fixed-scope projects, time-and-materials work, recurring or continuous testing, and enterprise programs. Normalize tester effort, inclusions, exclusions, report types, communication, remediation help, retests, travel, taxes, and change-control terms before comparing totals.
| Buyer scenario | Prioritize | Evidence to request | Common red flag | Shortlisting question |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SaaS or fintech application release | Authentication, tenant isolation, API and business logic | Assigned tester experience, authenticated test plan, sample finding, retest terms | Scanner-only proposal or no role matrix | Can the named team demonstrate manual auth, tenant, API, and business-logic testing plus defined retesting? |
| Mobile-first product | Android/iOS depth, binary and backend coverage | Mobile methodology, device/OS matrix, API boundary, sample mobile finding | Web-only method relabeled as mobile testing | Can the team show a mobile-specific method and deliverables for Android/iOS plus backend APIs? |
| Cloud and identity environment | Provider-specific IAM, containers, trust paths | Cloud authorization plan, assigned cloud expertise, stop conditions, evidence handling | Generic host scan with no cloud control-plane testing | Which cloud identities, trust paths, and control-plane actions will the assigned team test safely? |
| RBI- or SEBI-regulated entity | Applicability, independence, evidence, remediation cadence | Current regulatory mapping, auditor qualification where required, report and closure sample | “Compliance guaranteed” without scoped analysis | Which exact requirement applies to us, and how will your evidence/reporting address it without claiming automatic compliance? |
| Continuous delivery program | Recurring human testing, change triggers, integrations | Coverage schedule, tester allocation, finding workflow, regression and retest policy | “Continuous pentest” that is only continuous scanning | Which coverage is continuous automation, when do humans test changes, and what triggers a new human assessment? |
| Internal network or Active Directory | Segmentation, privilege paths, operational safety | Network inputs, test windows, escalation contacts, rollback/stop plan | No production-safety or domain-compromise safeguards | How will the team validate privilege and segmentation paths while controlling operational risk? |
| Cross-border enterprise program | Consistency, legal entities, data locations, specialist reach | Contracting map, workforce model, subprocessors, evidence locations, common reporting standard | Undisclosed subcontractors or vague data handling | Who contracts, who tests, where do reports/evidence live, and which subprocessors are involved? |
| Tight local procurement or onsite need | Indian entity, timezone, onsite availability, tender qualification | Office/entity details, GST and contracting documents, named local lead, tender evidence | Local address used as a substitute for technical proof | Can the provider meet our India entity/onsite/tender gate while still proving the required technical depth? |
Use the shortlist to run a consistent evaluation rather than asking only for “a VAPT quote.”
| Buyer question | Why it matters |
|---|---|
| What assets, roles, environments, and exclusions are in scope? | Prevents coverage gaps and commercial disputes |
| What work is automated and what work is tester-led? | Separates scanner coverage from human validation |
| Who performs the test and what experience fits this scope? | Assigned-team quality can matter more than brand size |
| What are the authorization, rules of engagement, and stop conditions? | Protects production systems and clarifies accountability |
| How are findings evidenced and severity determined? | Makes remediation and risk decisions defensible |
| What does the final report contain? | Aligns engineering, executive, audit, and procurement needs |
| What remediation support is included? | Helps convert findings into action |
| What exactly is the retest policy? | Clarifies how fixes are validated and closed |
| Where are credentials, evidence, and reports stored and processed? | Supports data-handling and sector requirements |
| Are contractors, subcontractors, or crowdsourced testers used? | Affects confidentiality, access, continuity, and oversight |
| What happens after a major release or scope change? | Determines whether one-time or recurring testing fits |
| Which sector-specific provider qualification actually applies? | Avoids importing the wrong regulatory assumption |
Look for scope-relevant human testing, assigned-team evidence, clear authorization and safety controls, actionable reporting, remediation support, written retest terms, secure data handling, and a delivery model that fits procurement. India presence can help operationally, but it should not replace technical due diligence.
Not universally. The answer depends on the entity, sector, tender, system, audit type, contract, and current governing rule. Confirm the applicable official requirement and the provider's current status before procurement. Empanelment does not by itself prove that a team is the best technical fit.
There is no defensible single price for every scope. Cost changes with assets, roles, application and API complexity, cloud or internal-network access, testing depth, specialist skills, reporting, onsite work, timeline, remediation support, and retesting. Compare normalized statements of work.
Choose according to the engagement. Local presence may help with contracting, timezone, onsite work, and tender requirements. Global delivery may add specialist depth or cross-border consistency. In either case, verify who will test, where evidence is handled, which entity contracts, and whether the provider meets the exact sector requirements.
VAPT commonly combines vulnerability assessment and penetration testing. Vulnerability assessment is often broader and more automated; penetration testing uses human judgment and controlled exploitation to validate exploitability and impact. The label is used inconsistently, so confirm the actual activities and deliverables.
Use a risk-based cadence and any applicable contractual or regulatory minimum. Reassess after major releases, architecture or identity changes, new internet-facing assets, acquisitions, material cloud changes, or significant incidents. High-change environments may need recurring human testing in addition to continuous scanning.
No. A penetration test provides evidence about a defined scope at a point in time. It can support assurance and an audit process, but it cannot prove that no vulnerability exists, prevent future incidents, or establish compliance with every applicable law, regulation, or standard.
A useful provider comparison starts with evidence, scope, and delivery fit, not logo recognition. Apply the same questions to every vendor, inspect the assigned team and sample report, distinguish human testing from scanning, and put authorization, data handling, remediation, and retesting into the contract. DeepStrike publishes this guide and is included in it, so validate fit the same way for every provider, including us.
If your team is preparing an application, API, cloud, mobile, network, or AI security assessment for India, contact DeepStrike for a scoped technical proposal and compare it against the same procurement framework used for every provider in this guide.
Mohammed Khalil is a cybersecurity architect focused on penetration testing, offensive security operations, and secure DevSecOps integration.

Stay secure with DeepStrike penetration testing services. Reach out for a quote or customized technical proposal today
Contact Us