PCI Compliance in the Cloud: The Definitive 2025 Guide

PCI Cloud Compliance

• Shared Responsibility Model: provider secures infra (of the cloud), you secure data/configs (in the cloud).
• PCI DSS 4.0 deadline March 31, 2025: shift from checklist risk based approach.
• Requires continuous security + universal MFA.
• Best strategy = scope reduction: segment CDE, use tokenization to cut audit cost/complexity.
• Leading breach cause: cloud misconfigs, not provider failures.
• Success: leverage cloud native tools, automation, monitoring & rigorous testing.

Why Cloud PCI Compliance Is a Boardroom Issue in 2025

The clock has run out. As of March 31, 2025, all requirements of the Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard (PCI DSS) 4.0 are mandatory. This isn't just another version update; it's a fundamental shift in how payment security is managed, especially in the cloud. We'll break down exactly what this means for your AWS, Azure, or GCP environment.

PCI compliance in the cloud is the process of meeting the PCI DSS for any application or system that stores, processes, or transmits cardholder data within a cloud service provider's (CSP) environment. While it's a contractual obligation from the major card brands (Visa, Mastercard, AmEx) and not a federal law in the U.S., the penalties for failure are severe enough to command boardroom attention.

The stakes have never been higher. The 2025 IBM Cost of a Data Breach Report reveals the average cost of a breach in the U.S. has hit an all time high of $10.22 million. Crucially, security reports consistently show that the top threats in the cloud aren't sophisticated attacks on the CSPs themselves, but customer side misconfigurations, weak credentials, and insecure APIs. This directly ties into the core challenge of cloud PCI compliance: you are responsible for what you build.

This isn't a theoretical overview. This is a practitioner's guide based on real world audit and penetration testing experience. We'll cover the Shared Responsibility Model, tactical blueprints for AWS, Azure, and GCP, and how to navigate the validation process to build a defensible and continuous compliance program.

The Great Divide: Mastering the Cloud Shared Responsibility Model

The non-negotiable foundation of cloud compliance is the Shared Responsibility Model (SRM). Getting this wrong is the root cause of most cloud compliance failures and data breaches. It boils down to a simple but critical distinction: "security of the cloud" versus "security in the cloud."

CSP Responsibility: Security OF the Cloud

The provider be it AWS, Microsoft, or Google is responsible for protecting the foundational infrastructure that runs all of its services. This includes the physical security of their global data centers, the security of the core network fabric, and the integrity of the virtualization layer (hypervisor). This is a huge benefit, as it allows you to inherit a vast array of security controls. For example, you don't need to worry about installing cameras or biometric scanners in an AWS data center to meet PCI DSS Requirement 9 (Restrict physical access); AWS handles that for you.

Your Responsibility: Security IN the Cloud

You are responsible for the security of everything you create, configure, and manage within the cloud. This is your domain, and it's where auditors will focus their attention. Your responsibilities include:

• Your Data: Securing your cardholder data, including encryption at rest and in transit.
• Identity & Access: Managing user identities and access policies (IAM) based on the principle of least privilege.
• Operating Systems: Patching guest operating systems on virtual machines.
• Network Configuration: Configuring virtual firewalls like security groups and network access control lists (NACLs).
• Application Security: Ensuring your application code is free of vulnerabilities, such as those listed in the OWASP Top 10.

This division of labor is not static; the line of responsibility shifts depending on the cloud service model you use.

• Infrastructure as a Service (IaaS): Think Amazon EC2, Azure Virtual Machines, or Google Compute Engine. Here, you have the most responsibility. The CSP manages the underlying physical infrastructure, but you're on the hook for everything from the guest operating system upwards.
• Platform as a Service (PaaS): With services like AWS Lambda or Adobe Commerce on cloud, the CSP's responsibility extends further. They manage the underlying platform, including the OS and runtime, relieving you of OS patching. You remain responsible for securing your application code, data, and user access.
• Software as a Service (SaaS): In a SaaS model like Microsoft 365 or Salesforce, the CSP manages nearly the entire stack. Your responsibility is typically limited to managing your data within the application and controlling user access.

Myth vs Fact: The Compliance Inheritance Fallacy

Myth: "My cloud provider is PCI compliant, so my application is too."

Fact: This is the single most dangerous assumption in cloud compliance. Your provider's Attestation of Compliance (AOC) only covers their infrastructure the "security of the cloud." You must still secure your part of the shared model and undergo your own audit to prove it. You can and should download your provider's AOC and Responsibility Matrix from their respective portals AWS Artifact, Microsoft Service Trust Portal, or Google Compliance Reports Manager. These documents are not just guides; they are foundational audit artifacts that a Qualified Security Assessor (QSA) will use to define the scope of your assessment.

The traditional Shared Responsibility Model simply draws a line in the sand. If a customer misconfigures an S3 bucket and exposes cardholder data, it's the customer's fault, even though the incident reflects poorly on the cloud platform. This reality has led to a strategic evolution in how some providers view their role. Notably, Google has begun to champion the concept of "Shared Fate". This isn't just a marketing term; it's a shift that acknowledges a CSP's reputation is directly tied to its customers' security success.

A "Shared Fate" model implies a more proactive partnership. The CSP provides secure by default configurations, opinionated blueprints for compliant architectures (like GCP's PCI on GKE Blueprint), and integrated risk management tools. This is a direct response to the high rate of customer side misconfigurations being the primary cause of cloud data breaches. It's a business imperative for CSPs to help customers succeed, as major breaches on their platform, regardless of fault, cause significant reputational damage. When choosing a CSP, it's wise to evaluate not just their compliance status but the maturity of their "Shared Fate" offerings. How effectively do their native tools and blueprints accelerate your own compliance journey?

PCI DSS 4.0 in the Cloud: What’s New and What It Means for You

The transition to PCI DSS 4.0 is complete, with all new requirements becoming mandatory as of March 31, 2025. The standard's main goal is to promote security as a continuous process and add flexibility for modern technologies like the cloud, moving away from a simple "point in time" audit mentality.

Key Evolving Requirements for Cloud Environments

Several new and updated requirements in v4.0 have a significant impact on cloud deployments:

• Mandatory Multi Factor Authentication (MFA): MFA is now required for all access into the Cardholder Data Environment (CDE), not just for remote access from outside the network. This is a massive change for cloud environments, where administrative consoles and APIs are internet accessible. It applies to cloud administrators, developers, and even service accounts where feasible.
• Stronger Passwords: The minimum password length has been increased from 7 to 12 characters, including both letters and numbers.
• Authenticated Internal Vulnerability Scans: Requirement 11.3.1.2 now explicitly mandates authenticated internal scans. Unauthenticated scans, which were common practice, offer limited visibility into system vulnerabilities. Authenticated scans provide deeper insights but also tend to uncover more findings, requiring more robust remediation efforts.
• Enhanced Anti Phishing & Security Awareness: Annual security awareness training must now cover threats like phishing and social engineering in greater detail, reflecting the human element's role in breaches.
• E-commerce Script Management: New requirements (6.4.3 and 11.6.1) mandate the management and monitoring of all scripts running on payment pages to combat digital skimming attacks like Magecart.

The Game Changer: The "Customized Approach"

Perhaps the most significant change in PCI DSS 4.0 is the introduction of the "Customized Approach." Instead of rigidly following the "Defined Approach" (the traditional checklist of controls), organizations can now design and implement their own controls to meet a requirement's objective.

This is a critical enabler for cloud native environments. It allows you to use innovative, cloud specific solutions that don't fit the old, on premises model. For example, instead of a traditional hardware firewall appliance to meet Requirement 1, you can use a combination of AWS Security Groups, Network ACLs, and a Web Application Firewall (WAF), and then demonstrate to an auditor how this combination achieves the same security objective.

However, the customized approach is not an easy way out. The PCI SSC has stated it is best suited for "risk mature" organizations with established risk management programs. For each custom control, you must:

1. Perform a detailed, targeted risk analysis.
2. Document a comprehensive controls matrix.
3. Have the implementation validated by a QSA.
4. It is not available for organizations validating with a Self Assessment Questionnaire (SAQ).

The ability to effectively use the customized approach serves as a direct indicator of an organization's cloud security maturity. A traditional "lift and shift" organization will likely stick to the defined approach, attempting to replicate on premise controls in the cloud. In contrast, a cloud native organization will want to leverage services like serverless functions, managed databases, and automated security groups, which don't map cleanly to the old checklist. To justify these modern controls to an auditor, they must use the customized approach, which demands deep documentation and risk analysis. Successfully navigating a customized approach assessment proves you not only have strong technical controls but also the robust governance, risk, and compliance (GRC) processes to back them up. It's a powerful signal to auditors and partners that you have a sophisticated and well managed cloud program.

The Blueprint for Compliance: Architecting on AWS, Azure, and GCP

All three major cloud providers AWS, Microsoft Azure, and Google Cloud are certified as Level 1 Service Providers. This means they provide a compliant foundation, but the tools, service names, and implementation details differ. The following provides a practical mapping of their core services to the 12 PCI DSS requirements, helping you architect your side of the responsibility model.

• 1. Secure Network & Systems
  • AWS: VPC, Subnets, Security Groups, NACLs, AWS Network Firewall, AWS WAF, AWS Shield.
  • Azure: Virtual Network (VNet), Subnets, Network Security Groups (NSGs), Azure Firewall, Application Gateway with WAF.
  • GCP: VPC, Subnets, VPC Firewall Rules, Cloud Armor, VPC Service Controls.
• 2. Secure Configurations
  • AWS: AWS Systems Manager (Patch Manager), AWS Config, Hardened AMIs.
  • Azure: Azure Policy, Microsoft Defender for Cloud, Guest Configuration.
  • GCP: OS Patch Management, Security Command Center, Hardened OS Images.
• 3. Protect Stored Data
  • AWS: Amazon S3 (SSE), EBS Encryption, AWS KMS, AWS CloudHSM.
  • Azure: Azure Storage Service Encryption, Azure Disk Encryption, Azure Key Vault, Azure Payment HSM.
  • GCP: Default Encryption at Rest, Cloud KMS, Cloud HSM, Sensitive Data Protection (DLP).
• 4. Encrypt Data in Transit
  • AWS: AWS Certificate Manager (ACM), Elastic Load Balancing (ELB) with TLS, VPC Peering Encryption.
  • Azure: SSL/TLS for Azure services, Application Gateway, VPN Gateway.
  • GCP: Default Encryption in Transit, Google Front End, Cloud Load Balancing with SSL Policies.
• 5. Malware Protection
  • AWS: Amazon GuardDuty, Amazon Inspector, AWS WAF, Partner solutions.
  • Azure: Microsoft Defender for Cloud, Microsoft Sentinel, Partner solutions.
  • GCP: Security Command Center, Event Threat Detection, Partner solutions.
• 6. Secure Systems/Apps
  • AWS: AWS Systems Manager, AWS Inspector, AWS WAF, Secure coding practices.
  • Azure: Microsoft Defender for Cloud, Azure DevOps (secure pipeline), GitHub Advanced Security.
  • GCP: Security Command Center, Web Security Scanner, Binary Authorization (for GKE).
• 7. Restrict Access
  • AWS: AWS IAM (Roles, Policies), Principle of Least Privilege.
  • Azure: Microsoft Entra ID (formerly Azure AD), Role Based Access Control (RBAC), Privileged Identity Management (PIM).
  • GCP: Cloud IAM (Roles, Permissions), Principle of Least Privilege.
• 8. Identify & Authenticate
  • AWS: AWS IAM (Users, Groups, Roles), MFA enforcement.
  • Azure: Microsoft Entra ID, MFA, Conditional Access Policies.
  • GCP: Cloud IAM, Cloud Identity, MFA enforcement.
• 9. Restrict Physical Access
  • AWS: Inherited from AWS (Customer responsible for on prem/endpoints).
  • Azure: Inherited from Azure (Customer responsible for on prem/endpoints).
  • GCP: Inherited from GCP (Customer responsible for on prem/endpoints).
• 10. Log & Monitor Access
  • AWS: AWS CloudTrail, AWS Config, Amazon CloudWatch, Amazon GuardDuty.
  • Azure: Azure Monitor, Microsoft Sentinel, Microsoft Defender for Cloud, Diagnostic Settings.
  • GCP: Cloud Logging, Cloud Monitoring, Access Transparency, Security Command Center.
• 11. Test Security Regularly
  • AWS: Amazon Inspector, AWS Security Hub, Partner ASV/Pen Test services.
  • Azure: Microsoft Defender for Cloud, Partner ASV/Pen Test services.
  • GCP: Security Command Center (Web Security Scanner), Partner ASV/Pen Test services.
• 12. Maintain Security Policy
  • AWS: AWS Organizations (SCPs), AWS Config, AWS Audit Manager.
  • Azure: Azure Policy, Azure Blueprints, Microsoft Purview Compliance Manager.
  • GCP: Organization Policy Service, Security Command Center.

Your Most Powerful Strategy: Aggressive Scope Reduction

The single most impactful strategy for managing the cost and complexity of a PCI DSS audit is to minimize the scope of your Cardholder Data Environment (CDE). The CDE includes all the people, processes, and technology that store, process, or transmit cardholder data (CHD) or sensitive authentication data (SAD). The guiding principle is simple: if a system doesn't need to touch cardholder data, it shouldn't be in the CDE. A smaller, well defined CDE is easier to secure, monitor, and audit.

How To: Isolate Your CDE with Cloud Network Segmentation

Here’s a step by step guide to building a tightly scoped CDE in the cloud:

1. Map Your Data Flows: Before you can segment, you must know where cardholder data lives and how it travels through your environment. Document every system and network path that interacts with CHD. This is a foundational requirement of PCI DSS (Req 1.1.3) and the first step in any scoping exercise.
2. Create a Dedicated CDE Account/Project: The highest level of logical isolation is to create a dedicated AWS account, Azure subscription, or GCP project solely for your CDE. Use organizational constructs like AWS Organizations, Azure Management Groups, or GCP Folders to enforce strict, top down policies (like AWS Service Control Policies) that can, for example, prevent non compliant services from ever being launched in this sensitive environment.
3. Build a Fortress VPC/VNet: Within your dedicated account, create a separate Virtual Private Cloud (VPC) or Virtual Network (VNet) for the CDE. This acts as your primary network boundary, logically separating it from all other workloads.
4. Use Subnets for Internal Zoning: Don't stop at the VPC level. Divide the CDE VPC into multiple subnets to create internal zones (e.g., a web tier, application tier, and data tier). Use stateless firewalls like Network ACLs (NACLs) or Network Security Groups (NSGs) to control traffic between these subnets, enforcing the principle of least privilege at the network layer.
5. Apply Granular Firewall Rules: Use stateful firewalls like Security Groups (AWS/GCP) or NSGs (Azure) to control traffic to and from individual instances or services. By default, these tools deny all inbound traffic. Your job is to create explicit "allow" rules for only the specific ports and protocols required for your application to function. This is a direct implementation of Requirement 1.

De scoping with Tokenization and P2PE

Beyond network controls, you can use data centric approaches to remove systems from scope entirely.

• Tokenization: This powerful technique involves replacing sensitive cardholder data with a non sensitive equivalent, or "token." The actual card data is stored securely in a vault, often managed by a third party provider. Your systems then only handle the token, which has no value to an attacker if stolen. This can remove entire applications and databases from your CDE scope, as they no longer store or process CHD.
• Point to Point Encryption (P2PE): With a validated P2PE solution, cardholder data is encrypted at the point of interaction (e.g., a payment terminal) and is not decrypted until it reaches the secure environment of the P2PE solution provider. This can remove your entire network from the scope of many PCI requirements, as it never handles unencrypted cardholder data.

Mini Case Study: A Level 1 merchant recently migrated their payment processing flow from monolithic EC2 instances to a serverless architecture using AWS Lambda and a tokenized payment gateway. This strategic shift reduced the number of customer managed controls for PCI DSS Requirement 11 by over 30% and cut their annual audit preparation time by nearly 40%, as entire categories of OS level patching and monitoring became AWS's responsibility.

In a traditional on premise world, the CDE was defined by a physical rack of servers and a specific VLAN. The network diagram was the ultimate source of truth for the audit boundary. In the cloud, this is no longer the case. A Lambda function in one VPC can access an S3 bucket in another, completely bypassing traditional network controls. The only thing governing that connection is an IAM policy. This means that identity and metadata have become the new perimeter. A robust resource tagging strategy (e.g., applying a tag like

pci scope=true to all CDE components) becomes a powerful compliance tool. Security policies, firewall rules, and monitoring alerts can then be applied dynamically to any resource bearing that tag. Your security and compliance teams must shift their mindset: the CDE is no longer just a network segment; it's a collection of resources defined by IAM roles and metadata tags. A failure to properly manage IAM and tagging is a failure to manage your CDE boundary.

Proving It: Audits, Penetration Testing, and Validation

Building a secure environment is only half the battle; you also have to prove it's effective. The validation process is how you demonstrate compliance to the card brands and your acquiring bank. This is why it's crucial to understand why continuous penetration testing matters.

SAQ vs RoC: Choosing Your Validation Path

Your required validation method is determined by your merchant level, which is based on your annual volume of payment card transactions.

• Self Assessment Questionnaire (SAQ): This is a validation tool for smaller merchants (Levels 2 4) to report on their compliance status. It's a self attestation, but it's critical to select and complete the correct PCI SSC SAQ for your business model (e.g., SAQ A for merchants that fully outsource all cardholder data functions, or SAQ A EP for certain e-commerce merchants). The costs for SAQ assistance and required scans can range from $1,000 to $10,000 annually.
• Report on Compliance (RoC): This is required for Level 1 merchants (those processing over six million transactions annually). A RoC is a formal, in depth audit conducted by a Qualified Security Assessor (QSA), an individual certified by the PCI SSC. The QSA performs technical testing, interviews personnel, and reviews documentation to verify that all applicable controls are in place. The findings are documented in the RoC, and the process culminates in a signed Attestation of Compliance (AOC). A full RoC audit is a significant undertaking, with costs ranging from $35,000 to over $200,000.

Requirement 11 Deep Dive: Testing Your Defenses

Requirement 11 is all about regularly testing your security systems and processes. It's one of the most hands-on parts of the standard.

• Quarterly ASV Scans (Req. 11.3.2): You must engage a PCI SSC Approved Scanning Vendor (ASV) to perform external vulnerability scans on all your internet facing systems every 90 days. The ASV's role is to identify vulnerabilities that could be exploited from the internet, and you must remediate any high or critical findings to pass the scan.
• Penetration Testing (Req. 11.4): This is a simulated attack designed to find exploitable vulnerabilities that an automated scanner might miss. It must be performed at least annually and after any significant change to your environment, following industry accepted methodologies like NIST SP 800 115. The scope must cover the entire CDE from both an internal and external perspective and include both network layer and application layer testing. For a detailed breakdown, see our PCI DSS 11.3 Penetration Testing. When conducting a penetration test in the cloud, you must adhere to the CSP's rules of engagement. You are permitted to test your own instances and applications (e.g., EC2, RDS, Lambda), but you are strictly prohibited from testing the underlying AWS, Azure, or GCP infrastructure. You may need to notify your CSP by submitting a form before conducting certain types of tests.
• Segmentation Testing (Req. 11.4.5): If you use network segmentation to reduce your PCI scope, you must have it tested to prove it's effective. This is not optional. For merchants, this test must be performed at least annually. For service providers, PCI DSS 4.0 now requires it to be performed every six months. The goal is to verify that out of scope systems cannot communicate with systems inside the CDE. This typically involves a combination of configuration reviews and active tests, such as port scanning and connection attempts from out of scope zones to in scope zones, to confirm that your firewalls and access control lists are blocking traffic as expected.

The Real Cost of PCI Compliance (and Non Compliance)

Budgeting for PCI compliance requires a realistic view of both direct and indirect costs. However, these expenses pale in comparison to the financial and reputational fallout of non compliance.

Budgeting for Compliance: A Breakdown

A typical PCI compliance budget includes several key components:

• Audits & Assessments: Costs can range from $5,000- $20,000 for SAQ assistance to $35,000- $200,000+ for a full RoC audit by a QSA.
• Quarterly ASV Scans: These can cost up to $200 per IP address annually.
• Penetration Testing: Depending on the size and complexity of your CDE, a thorough anywhere from $3,000 to over $30,000.
• Remediation & Tooling: This category includes costs for upgrading systems, purchasing a WAF, implementing encryption solutions, and security awareness training for employees (which can cost $20- $30 per employee).
• Internal Resources: Don't forget the time and salary of your team members who are dedicated to managing the compliance program, liaising with auditors, and remediating findings.

The Alternative: The Staggering Cost of Failure

The costs of getting compliance wrong are far more severe:

• PCI Non Compliance Fines: The major card brands can levy fines ranging from $5,000 to $100,000 per month for non compliance. These are issued to your acquiring bank, which will pass them on to you.
• Post Breach Penalties: In the event of a data breach, you can be fined up to $90 per compromised cardholder.
• Cost of a Data Breach: According to IBM's 2025 report, the average cost of a data breach in the United States is $10.22 million. This figure includes forensic investigations, legal fees, customer notifications, credit monitoring for victims, and regulatory fines.
• Reputational Damage: The loss of customer trust is often the most damaging and long lasting consequence of a breach, leading to customer churn and a tarnished brand image.

It's clear that PCI DSS compliance should not be viewed as a mere cost center, but as a strategic investment in risk reduction. Research shows that the average cost of non compliance is nearly three times higher than the cost of maintaining a compliance program. The initial investment in a QSA audit, penetration test, and necessary security tools might seem high. However, a single non compliance fine for a few months could easily exceed that amount, even without a breach occurring. A single data breach, with an average cost in the millions, represents an existential threat to many businesses. The controls required for PCI DSS strong segmentation, encryption, comprehensive logging, and regular testing are the very same controls that form the foundation of a mature security program. Therefore, the budget allocated for PCI is not just for a certificate; it's a budget for foundational cybersecurity that protects the entire business.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)

1. Can you be PCI compliant in a public cloud like AWS, Azure, or GCP?

Yes, absolutely. All major cloud providers are Level 1 PCI DSS compliant service providers. However, their compliance only covers the infrastructure ("security of the cloud"). You are still responsible for securing your applications and data according to the Shared Responsibility Model.

2. What is the difference between PCI DSS and SOC 2?

PCI DSS is a prescriptive standard focused specifically on protecting payment card data, with 12 strict requirements. SOC 2 is a flexible framework based on the Trust Services Criteria (Security, Availability, Confidentiality, Processing Integrity, Privacy) that reports on an organization's security controls but doesn't dictate exactly which controls to use. Many organizations that handle payments will need to comply with both.

3. How does PCI DSS 4.0 specifically affect cloud environments?

PCI DSS 4.0 is much better suited for the cloud. The "Customized Approach" allows organizations to use cloud native security controls (like security groups and serverless functions) instead of traditional on premise solutions. It also mandates stronger controls like MFA for all access to the CDE, which is critical in cloud environments where admin consoles are accessible over the internet.

4. What is the very first step to achieving PCI compliance in the cloud?

The first and most critical step is scoping. You must identify and document every system, process, and person that interacts with cardholder data to define your Cardholder Data Environment (CDE). Without an accurate scope, you cannot apply the necessary controls or effectively reduce your compliance burden.

5. Does using a PCI compliant payment gateway make my website compliant?

Not automatically. Using a compliant payment gateway like Stripe or Square can significantly reduce your scope, often allowing you to qualify for a simpler SAQ (like SAQ A). However, you are still responsible for ensuring your own systems (like your e-commerce server) don't inadvertently handle or store card data and are securely configured.

6. How often is PCI segmentation testing required?

For merchants, segmentation testing must be performed at least annually. For service providers, PCI DSS 4.0 requires it to be performed every six months. It must also be performed after any significant change is made to the segmentation controls.

7. What is the biggest mistake companies make with cloud PCI compliance?

The biggest and most common mistake is fundamentally misunderstanding the Shared Responsibility Model. Many companies incorrectly assume that because their cloud provider is compliant, they are compliant by extension. This leads to neglecting their own responsibilities for data encryption, access control, and vulnerability management, which is precisely where most cloud breaches occur.

From Compliance Burden to Security Catalyst

The path to sustainable PCI compliance in the cloud is clear: master the Shared Responsibility Model, be relentless in reducing your scope, and embrace automation to make security a continuous process, not a point in time audit.

The rigor demanded by PCI DSS 4.0 should not be seen as a burden. The disciplines it enforces, strong access control, comprehensive logging, robust vulnerability management, and a risk based security mindset are the very cornerstones of a mature and resilient cloud security program. Achieving PCI compliance is a byproduct of building a secure environment. By using the standard as a framework, you're not just protecting cardholder data; you're building a foundation of security that protects your entire business, enhances customer trust, and enables you to innovate safely in the cloud.

Ready to Strengthen Your Defenses?

The threats of 2025 demand more than just awareness; they require readiness. If you're looking to validate your security posture, identify hidden risks, or build a resilient defense strategy, DeepStrike is here to help. Our team of practitioners provides clear, actionable guidance to protect your business.

Explore our penetration testing services for businesses to see how we can uncover vulnerabilities before attackers do. Drop us a line, we’re always ready to dive in.

References & Official Resources

PCI Security Standards Council : PCI DSS Overview

PCI SSC : Self Assessment Questionnaires (SAQs)

AWS Artifact

Microsoft Service Trust Portal

Azure Policy : PCI DSS initiative

Google Cloud : Compliance Reports Manager

Google Cloud : Security Command Center

Google Cloud : VPC Service Controls

IBM : Cost of a Data Breach

OWASP Top 10

NIST SP 800 115

NIST SP 800 53 (Rev. 5)

About the Author

Mohammed Khalil is a Cybersecurity Architect at DeepStrike, specializing in advanced penetration testing and offensive security operations. With certifications including CISSP, OSCP, and OSWE, he has led numerous red team engagements for Fortune 500 companies, focusing on cloud security, application vulnerabilities, and adversary emulation. His work involves dissecting complex attack chains and developing resilient defense strategies for clients in the finance, healthcare, and technology sectors.