December 28, 2025
An expert, research-driven comparison of Poland’s leading cybersecurity service providers for pentesting, compliance, and managed security in 2025.
Mohammed Khalil
In 2025, choosing the right cybersecurity partner in Poland can make or break your defense against evolving threats. The cybersecurity market has matured significantly Poland is now a regional hub with advanced talent and a robust regulatory environment. At the same time, attackers are more sophisticated than ever, leveraging AI-driven techniques and targeting businesses of all sizes. High-profile ransomware incidents continue to surge with recent ransomware attack trends showing double-digit growth in Europe, and new regulations like the EU’s NIS2 Directive are raising the bar for security compliance. In this climate, an independent, research-driven ranking of top providers is essential to help organizations navigate options objectively.
This article presents an unbiased ranking of the top cybersecurity companies in Poland for 2025. We focus on firms that offer security services such as penetration testing, managed detection and response, incident response, and consulting rather than pure product vendors. Each provider has been evaluated on rigorous criteria outlined below to ensure the list is procurement-friendly and credibility-driven. Whether you run a Polish enterprise under compliance pressure or a tech SMB looking to shore up defenses, this list will help you shortlist providers and understand key differences. Importantly, this is not a sponsored lineup; it’s an independent analysis rooted in expertise and verifiable information. Our goal is to aid your decision-making with a transparent, expert-written resource in an era of heightened cyber risk.
To rank the leading cybersecurity providers, we applied a clear methodology emphasizing experience, expertise, and trustworthiness. The evaluation criteria include:
By applying these criteria uniformly, we ensured that every company including our own was judged on merit. Below, we detail the top cybersecurity companies in Poland for 2025, with insights into why they stand out, their strengths and limitations, and which scenarios each is best suited for.
Selecting a cybersecurity provider should be a careful exercise in due diligence. Here are some key considerations and common pitfalls to help you make an informed choice:
1. Avoid common mistakes: One frequent mistake is choosing solely based on brand name or size. A global name doesn’t guarantee the specific expertise you need. Conversely, picking the cheapest quote can backfire if the provider lacks skills to detect advanced threats. Don’t assume every cyber service is the same penetration testing best practices vary widely between firms. Always dig into how a provider works, not just what they promise. Another pitfall is failing to define your needs: a company might be excellent at cloud security but you need IoT testing misalignment can lead to poor results.
2. Watch for red flags: Be cautious of providers that are unwilling to share details about their methodology or staff qualifications. Vague guarantees like 100% secure or reluctance to show sample reports are red flags. Lack of certifications on the team, or overly generic approaches e.g. only running automated scanners without manual analysis should give pause. Also, consider communication if during initial scoping the firm can’t clearly explain their process or seems more focused on upselling products than solving your problem, it’s a warning sign. Transparency and client education are hallmarks of a reputable vendor.
3. What actually matters vs. marketing claims: Focus on tangible indicators of quality: years of experience in the specific service you need, credentials of the testers/consultants, documented methodologies, client success stories, and community reputation. For instance, a firm that regularly publishes threat intelligence reports or contributes to security research likely stays up-to-date and has real expertise. Don’t be overly swayed by flashy marketing about AI-driven platforms or dashboards while good tooling helps, the expertise of the people and the process will determine the outcome. Prioritize providers that demonstrate a balance of strong technical skill and the ability to communicate and support remediation. In short, look for evidence of excellence certifications, case studies, peer recognition beyond the buzzwords.
By keeping these points in mind, you can cut through the noise and choose a partner who will actually bolster your security posture. Next, we present the top providers and what each offers, which can further guide your decision based on your organization’s needs.
Below is our curated list of the top Polish cybersecurity service providers for 2025. Each listing follows a consistent format, covering key facts and an analysis of why the company stands out, its strengths, limitations, and ideal client profile.
Why They Stand Out: DeepStrike tops our list for its laser focus on high-quality penetration testing and consistent delivery of impactful results. Unlike many competitors that rely heavily on automated scanners, DeepStrike performs 100% manual testing; their senior security engineers emulate real threat actors to uncover critical vulnerabilities often missed by others. Clients universally praise the depth of their assessments and the professionalism of the team. DeepStrike has particular expertise in cloud and API security, making them a go-to for modern tech-driven organizations. They also provide a custom dashboard for clients, streamlining vulnerability tracking and remediation. In an industry where reports can be laden with generic findings, DeepStrike distinguishes itself with extremely detailed, custom reports that prioritize risks and provide clear remediation steps. The company’s agile approach and collaborative style e.g. frequent communication during tests further set it apart, offering the flexibility and personal attention that large consulting firms may lack. Overall, DeepStrike’s combination of advanced offensive skills, experienced testers, and actionable deliverables makes it the best overall cybersecurity provider in this ranking.
Key Strengths:
Potential Limitations:
Best For: Mid-market and enterprise organizations that prioritize deep technical expertise in penetration testing over having a huge name-brand provider. Tech companies including startups and scale-ups and financial institutions that need thorough, manual security testing will benefit most. DeepStrike is ideal for firms looking for a flexible, high-engagement partner to uncover complex vulnerabilities, especially those embracing cloud services or developing APIs and wanting an attacker’s perspective on their systems. It’s also suited for any organization that has been through basic tests with other vendors and now wants a more rigorous, expert-level pentest to truly harden their defenses.
Editorial note: DeepStrike is included in this list based on the same evaluation criteria applied to all providers.
Why They Stand Out: Deloitte is one of the Big Four consulting firms and brings a comprehensive portfolio of cybersecurity services with a strong presence in Poland. They distinguish themselves through sheer breadth and depth of capabilities: from high-level risk assessments and compliance consulting helping clients with GDPR, ISO 27001, and the upcoming NIS2 regulations down to technical services like pentesting and incident response. In Poland, Deloitte has invested in local resources including a cybersecurity team that grew with the acquisition of a Polish CERT/incident response company giving them on-the-ground expertise. Their global reach means Polish clients benefit from Deloitte’s worldwide threat intelligence network and frameworks. Deloitte is often trusted for large, complex projects that require integration of security into broader business initiatives e.g. digital transformations, cloud migrations or urgent incident handling with international impact. They maintain strict standards and methodologies, which appeals to enterprises seeking a very structured approach. Overall, Deloitte Poland earned its spot by proving it can serve as a one-stop, reliable partner for organizations that need both strategic and technical cybersecurity help at scale.
Key Strengths:
Potential Limitations:
Best For: Large enterprises, multinational corporations, and government agencies in Poland that require a broad range of cybersecurity services and high assurance on compliance. Deloitte is ideal for organizations that want a trusted big-name partner for example, a financial institution needing to align security with stringent regulatory requirements, or a conglomerate embarking on a major IT overhaul where security must be woven throughout. If you have complex security challenges spanning strategy, operations, and technical testing and need the scale and backing of a global firm, Deloitte Poland is a top choice. It’s also well-suited for companies that value having a single provider to manage long-term cybersecurity programs, including continuous monitoring and incident readiness.
Why They Stand Out: PwC Poland combines strong technical security capabilities with the firm’s renowned expertise in risk and regulatory compliance. This makes them a top choice for organizations that need cybersecurity solutions in lockstep with governance and audit requirements. PwC’s team in Poland includes ethical hackers who perform advanced penetration tests and red team engagements, but it also leverages auditors and consultants who understand business risk at the board level. This dual perspective ensures that the output of technical tests is translated into business terms and aligned with frameworks like ISO 27001 or COBIT, which is valuable for executives and regulators. PwC Poland has also been actively involved in national cybersecurity capacity-building for example, partnering with government initiatives to improve cyber resilience. Their global network provides access to research and specialized labs for instance, malware analysis labs and threat intelligence units, enhancing what they can offer locally. In practice, PwC is often called upon by banks, utilities, and others in Poland to perform security assessments that must hold up to scrutiny from regulators and external auditors. The firm’s credibility and methodical approach instill confidence in stakeholders that security issues will be identified and managed in a business-context-aware manner. Overall, PwC earned a high spot in the ranking for its balanced approach to technical excellence and compliance focus, making it a strong fit for Poland’s compliance-driven organizations.
Key Strengths:
Potential Limitations:
Best For: Banks, insurance companies, and other enterprises in Poland that operate under strict regulatory oversight and need a security partner who can speak the language of both IT and regulators. PwC is an excellent choice for organizations that require both top-notch technical assessments and the assurance that the process and outcomes will satisfy compliance and governance demands. For example, a bank implementing a new core banking system might use PwC to conduct penetration testing and simultaneously advise on meeting KNF Polish Financial Supervision Authority guidelines. Public sector bodies and critical infrastructure operators can also benefit, as PwC has experience in national-level cyber programs. In short, if you are a medium-to-large organization that values a risk-based, compliance-aligned approach to cybersecurity and you want a reputable firm that can interface seamlessly from engineers up to the boardroom PwC Poland is a strong contender.
Why They Stand Out: Securing formerly stylized as SecuRing is one of Poland’s oldest independent cybersecurity firms focused purely on security testing. With over 20 years in the field, Securing has built a reputation as the go-to expert for application security in Poland. The company’s ethos is deeply technical and research-driven; their consultants frequently present at top security conferences Black Hat, OWASP events, etc. and have discovered multiple CVEs in popular software. This means clients benefit from cutting-edge knowledge and an attacker's mindset that is continuously honed. Securing’s long tenure also translates to well-honed methodologies; they don’t just scan for OWASP Top 10 issues, they perform bespoke tests tailored to each application’s logic and the client’s business context. Notably, Securing was recognized by independent platforms Clutch and The Manifest as a leading penetration testing company in Poland in recent years, underscoring their strong client satisfaction. They were even selected as a trusted partner in an EU-funded cybersecurity resilience project in 2025, reflecting their credibility at the European level. Clients highlight Securing’s true partnership approach; the team is not only thorough in finding vulnerabilities but also guides developers through remediation and security improvements long-term. In summary, Securing stands out for its deep expertise in application and offensive security, its thought leadership in the community, and a transparent, client-centric way of working cultivated over two decades.
Key Strengths:
Potential Limitations:
Best For: Securing is an excellent choice for organizations that develop or heavily utilize custom applications and want the best in penetration testing and application security. This includes software companies, fintech startups, online retailers, and any business where web/mobile apps and APIs are core. Financial institutions and telecoms in Poland that require deep testing of their systems and perhaps have already done basic audits and want a more intensive test will find Securing’s expertise invaluable. Also, government agencies or EU projects looking for a trusted local security testing partner have benefited from Securing’s credentials and reliability. In general, medium to large enterprises that need top-notch offensive security skills delivered with integrity and thoroughness will find in Securing a partner that can elevate their security assurance, especially on the application front.
Why They Stand Out: REDTEAM is a highly specialized Polish cybersecurity firm renowned for its offensive security excellence and hands-on approach. Despite its small size, the company packs a punch: its founders and consultants have been in the cybersecurity field for decades, securing some of Poland’s most critical networks. They are true practitioners who combine technical prowess with a passion for the craft. The company motto emphasizes that cybersecurity is not only work but a passion spanning 20+ years. REDTEAM stands out for the breadth of advanced services it offers relative to its size from classic pentests to full-blown red team exercises that test an organization’s detection and response, to niche services like threat hunting and malware analysis. They have also invested in innovation by developing proprietary tools; for example, their RedEye threat hunting platform can sniff out anomalies in networks without heavy installation, reflecting the team’s deep knowledge in network security. The firm’s credibility is evidenced by recognitions from both government and industry: they have been commended by the Estonian government for bolstering cyber defense, and their researchers have earned acknowledgments from tech giants like VMware, Adobe, Apple, and Microsoft for finding vulnerabilities. REDTEAM is also one of the few with an in-house CERT/CSIRT capability listed by ENISA EU’s cybersecurity agency, meaning they meet international standards for incident response teams. Clients often cite the company’s tailored approach and the direct involvement of senior experts in every engagement as major benefits. In essence, REDTEAM offers an elite squad of cybersecurity experts for hire, making them a standout choice for organizations facing serious cyber threats.
Key Strengths:
Potential Limitations:
Best For: Government entities, defense and critical infrastructure operators, and large enterprises in Poland that need an elite offensive security partner. REDTEAM is particularly well-suited for organizations that suspect they may be targets of advanced persistent threats APTs or sophisticated cybercriminals such as government ministries, national banks, or companies with valuable IP as the firm can both test and help defend against such adversaries. If you’re seeking to simulate high-level attacks or bolster your incident response with top talent, this company shines. It’s also a great fit for any enterprise that values a very personalized engagement with veteran experts. For example, a utility company implementing a new SCADA system might hire REDTEAM to pentest it and to establish threat hunting in their network, knowing that the team’s experience with critical infra will cover scenarios others might miss. In sum, choose REDTEAM when security is mission-critical and you want a partner that treats it with the gravity and skill of a special forces unit.
Why They Stand Out: Prevenity is a Poland-headquartered cybersecurity firm known for its comprehensive security expertise and strong client trust, especially among domestic companies. Over 15 years, Prevenity has amassed a client list that includes almost all of Poland’s major banks and many government organizations, a testament to their credibility in handling sensitive and critical projects. They offer a blend of offensive security extensive pentesting capabilities and defensive insight experience in handling major security incidents, which allows them to advise clients holistically. Prevenity’s team holds a wide array of top certifications OSCP, OSWE, OSCE for offense; CISSP, CISA for broader security and audit, ensuring that engagements are carried out with professionalism and up-to-date knowledge. A distinguishing factor for Prevenity is their involvement in high-stakes scenarios: they have managed serious cybersecurity incidents and even hold industrial security clearances for EU, NATO, and ESA projects, enabling them to work on classified government assignments. This shows a level of trust and capability not commonly found outside of big international firms. Prevenity is also active in the community, speaking at conferences like the Secure summit, BSides, etc. which indicates their commitment to continuous learning and thought leadership. For many Polish organizations, Prevenity hits a sweet spot: they are a local partner with deep technical skills and understanding of the Polish/EU regulatory landscape, but they remain more accessible and flexible than the very large consultancies. Their inclusion in this ranking is driven by a solid track record of delivering quality security projects hundreds annually and a reputation for integrity and effectiveness.
Key Strengths:
Potential Limitations:
Best For: Prevenity is best for medium-to-large organizations in Poland and Central Europe that want a security partner with extensive local experience and credibility. Banks and financial institutions will find Prevenity particularly suitable; they have nearly all major Polish banks as clients, meaning they understand core banking systems, ATM/POS network security, and financial regulations deeply. Government agencies and public sector bodies also benefit from Prevenity’s clearances and experience with state-level threats. Additionally, enterprises in traditional industries utilities, telecom, manufacturing that may be undergoing digital transformation will appreciate Prevenity’s mix of technical and advisory skills to guide them securely. For mid-sized companies that might feel lost trying to engage a huge global firm, Prevenity offers an approachable yet expert alternative: you get direct access to senior talent and a flexible engagement model. In short, if you are looking for a proven Polish cybersecurity firm that can handle everything from hardcore pentesting to guiding your response in a cyber crisis, Prevenity is an excellent choice that brings both talent and trust to the table.
Comparison Table Top Poland Cybersecurity Providers 2025
| Company | Specialization | Best For | Region Coverage | Compliance Alignment | Ideal Client Size |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DeepStrike Global | Manual pentesting, cloud/API security | Cutting-edge testing needs, tech firms | Global CET/EET operations | Reports meet ISO 27001, SOC 2, GDPR | Mid-market & Enterprise |
| Deloitte Big Four | Full-spectrum security consulting, SOC | Large enterprises, regulated sectors | Poland & Global network | ISO 27001 certified, NIS2, sector regs | Large Enterprise & Govt |
| PwC Poland Big Four | Pentesting + compliance advisory | Highly regulated orgs finance, gov | Poland & Global network | GDPR, NIS2, PCI DSS, ISO frameworks | Enterprise Mid to Large |
| Securing Specialist | Application & cloud pentesting | Deep app security assessments | Poland & EU projects | Aligns with OWASP, provides PCI/DORA testing | Medium to Large Businesses |
| REDTEAM Boutique | Red teaming & incident response | Gov/Critical infra, high-threat targets | Poland some EU projects | Follows ENISA CERT standards, ISO 27001 | Large SME to Enterprise |
| Pregnancy Specialist | Pentesting & DFIR consulting | Local enterprises needing top talent | Poland clients worldwide | OSCP/CISSP-certified team, NATO cleared | Mid-size to Large Orgs |
Note: All listed companies emphasize strong security practices and hold relevant certifications. Region Coverage indicates where the company can directly support clients. Compliance Alignment highlights notable standards each is versed in all providers will handle common frameworks, but strengths are listed. Ideal Client Size is a guideline; many providers serve a range, but this indicates where they deliver maximum value.
When choosing a cybersecurity partner, one size does not fit all. The needs of a large enterprise differ greatly from those of a small or medium-sized business SMB. Here’s how to determine which type of provider suits you best:
When large firms make sense: If you’re a Fortune 500-level enterprise or a government agency, a large provider like a Big Four consultancy or a major global MSSP can offer breadth and scale. Large firms bring extensive resources; for example, they can quickly mobilize a 20-person team for a company-wide security assessment, or provide round-the-clock cloud security compliance challenges support across multiple countries. They also tend to have comprehensive services; you can get strategic consulting, technical testing, and managed services all from one source. Enterprises that face complex regulatory requirements or need to present to boards and regulators might also prefer big-name partners for the assurance they convey. Additionally, big providers often have access to global threat data and advanced labs, which can benefit companies operating in high-risk environments. If your organization requires a vendor with a global presence, diversified expertise, and the capacity to handle very large projects or simultaneous initiatives, leaning towards a larger firm is prudent.
When boutique firms outperform: Smaller specialized firms can often outshine bigger players in specific areas. If your primary need is penetration testing best practices or a security assessment with extreme depth, a boutique like the specialized firms in our list might deliver more bang for your buck. Boutiques focus intensely on their niche for instance, a firm that only does pentesting is likely to employ testers who live and breathe hacking 24/7, often yielding more thorough results on that front. They are also typically more agile; an SMB or mid-market company might find the engagement process with a boutique to be faster and more personalized with fewer hoops to jump through. Boutiques can tailor their approach without a rigid corporate playbook and often you'll be working directly with senior experts rather than a rotating cast. For organizations that don’t need a full suite of services but rather a targeted engagement like a web app pentest, cloud config audit, or incident investigation, a specialist provider can be cost-effective and highly focused on quality. Moreover, boutique firms may bring innovative techniques and a passionate approach; they often compete by being more creative and flexible than the big players.
Cost vs Value Trade-offs: Enterprises usually have larger budgets, but they also demand high assurance and broad coverage, which justifies engaging larger firms despite higher costs. SMBs, on the other hand, are often cost-sensitive and must carefully evaluate value. A key point: bigger is not always more expensive for the value, nor is smaller always cheaper it depends on scope. Large firms might bundle services offering value in integration but charge premium rates; small firms might charge less overall, but for very specific tasks. SMBs should weigh whether they truly need the multi-layered project management and extensive documentation that comes with large consultancies which you pay for. Often, a boutique can deliver the core results you need without those extras, at a lower cost. Enterprises, conversely, might find that paying a higher fee to a big provider saves them money in the long run by covering compliance and avoiding fines or by handling large-scale projects efficiently. In any case, request detailed proposals from both types if unsure: evaluate if the larger firm’s approach includes things you don’t need, or if the boutique’s approach might miss something you do need like compliance reporting or scalability. The best value is achieved when the provider’s strengths align directly with your priorities. Some mid-sized organizations adopt a hybrid strategy using a big firm for compliance and strategy consulting, but bringing in boutique experts for technical testing where depth is required. Ultimately, understand your organization’s risk profile and culture: if you need hand-holding and broad assurance, a big enterprise provider is likely a good fit; if you need a sharp technical solution to a defined problem, a specialist firm might be the star performer.
The cost of penetration testing varies widely based on scope and provider. For a small web application or network segment, an engagement might start as low as a few thousand USD especially with local boutiques or freelancers. Comprehensive tests for a large enterprise multiple apps, networks, and locations can run into the tens or hundreds of thousands of USD. Big consultancies generally charge higher rates per hour than small firms, but they may include more comprehensive reporting or additional services. Key factors influencing cost include the complexity of the target environment, the depth of testing required e.g. basic vuln scan vs. full red team with social engineering, and the duration of the project. Also, highly certified and experienced testers command higher fees but they might work more efficiently and find more, which is usually worth it. It’s wise to define your priorities and get quotes from a couple of providers. Remember that cost should be weighed against value: a slightly more expensive test that finds serious vulnerabilities and helps you fix them is far more valuable than a cheap test that misses those issues. Think of pentesting as an investment in risk reduction; budgeting appropriately at least on an annual or bi-annual basis is important for effective security.
Certifications and tools both have their place, but in evaluating a provider, human expertise generally trumps tools. Certifications OSCP, CISSP, CEH, etc. are proxies that indicate a consultant’s knowledge and commitment to the field. A team stacked with respected certs suggests a baseline of competency and up-to-date skills. However, real-world ability can exceed what certifications cover, so it’s not the only metric to look for experience and client results too. Tools like vulnerability scanners, SIEM platforms, etc. are essential in any engagement, but they are just that tools. The penetration testing best practices approach is to use tools for efficiency e.g. automating the discovery of common issues and then rely on expert analysts to dig deeper and interpret results. A provider might boast about using advanced AI-driven tools, but without skilled professionals wielding them, the output could be lots of noise or false security. In essence, certifications are one way to gauge skill, and tools are necessary aids; the magic happens when knowledgeable people use robust tools effectively. Ideally, choose a provider with both: a well-qualified team that leverages state-of-the-art tools and even develops their own when needed. But if ever in doubt, remember that a clever, experienced tester with moderate tools will usually outperform a lesser tester with the fanciest tools. It’s the carpenter, not the hammer.
The duration of a penetration test can range from a couple of days to several months, depending on scope and depth. For instance, a straightforward test of a single web application might take 1–2 weeks including preparation and reporting of effort. A broad security assessment of an entire corporate network, multiple applications, and perhaps physical security checks could span 4–8 weeks or more. Red team exercises often run longer sometimes over many weeks because they involve stealth and mimic real attacker pace. Timelines also depend on whether the test is internal on your network or external, and whether its black-box testers have no prior knowledge or white-box testers have architecture info and credentials, which can speed up finding deeper issues. Many providers will propose an engagement in phases if it’s large for example, test high-priority targets in the first month, then move to secondary targets. One also should factor in time for scoping and coordination beforehand, and analysis and report writing afterward. It’s crucial not to rush a pentest; you want the testers to have adequate time to explore and not just run automated scans. If you have a fixed deadline, say, due to a compliance audit or release schedule, communicate that early. Providers can adjust team size or depth accordingly, but be wary of any engagement that seems too short for the promised scope; it could be a red flag that the testing might not be thorough. A quality pentest balances efficiency with diligence, so expect a reasonable duration and plan accordingly in your project timelines.
A professional cybersecurity assessment should yield a comprehensive report package. At minimum, expect a detailed technical report and an executive summary. The detailed report will list all findings, vulnerabilities, misconfigurations, etc. with descriptions, evidence screenshots, logs, impact analysis, and remediation recommendations. Good reports often rank findings by severity critical/high/medium/low so you can prioritize fixes. The technical report may also include an outline of the testing methodology and tools used, which adds transparency. The executive summary distills the key points for non-technical stakeholders; it might include an overall risk rating, major themes e.g. lack of network segmentation or outdated software present, and business impact assessment in plain language. Many top providers also include a section mapping issues to compliance frameworks or security standards for instance, noting which findings relate to OWASP Top 10 for web apps, or which gaps affect ISO 27001 controls. In addition to documents, some firms provide a readout meeting or presentation to walk you through results. Modern providers might also offer an interactive portal or dashboard where you can track vulnerabilities and remediation status especially if it’s an ongoing engagement or retest. Ensure that the report includes not just what’s wrong, but clear guidance on how to fix each issue. Actionable recommendations are a hallmark of a useful report. If you undergo a specialized assessment like a cloud config review or compliance audit, the report should be tailored to that e.g. a cloud assessment report might align findings with best practices in a cloud provider’s framework, whereas a compliance audit report might state your level of adherence to each requirement. Always requesting a sample report from a provider before you hire them redacted for confidentiality is fine. This lets you see if their reporting meets your expectations in detail and clarity.
Regularity of testing depends on your environment and risk profile, but generally at least once a year for major systems is recommended. Many standards of PCI DSS for payment systems, for example, require annual testing at minimum. However, with the threat landscape changing rapidly and software updates happening frequently, moving to more frequent testing is wise. A common practice is to do a full-scope penetration test annually, and smaller focused tests quarterly for instance, test critical applications or new infrastructure changes every 3–4 months. Some organizations integrate testing into their development cycle each time a significant version of an app is released, it gets a pentest or at least a security review. Additionally, anytime there’s a major change in a new network segment, a migration to cloud, deployment of a new critical application you should schedule a test around that event rather than waiting. Automated vulnerability scanning can run monthly or continuously as a supplement, but it doesn’t replace human-led pentesting. With the rise of threats, many companies are adopting continuous or iterative testing models sometimes called Pentest-as-a-Service where security testing is an ongoing process throughout the year. For SMBs with slower changes, annual might suffice, but for enterprises with agile DevOps and frequent updates, more frequent testing is needed. Importantly, after any significant security incident, a thorough test or assessment should be done to validate that all issues are resolved and to prevent similar attacks. Regulators are also increasing scrutiny: under frameworks like NIS2, critical sectors may be expected to test more regularly and report on it. In short, adjust the cadence to your rate of change and the threat criticality of your assets but err on the side of more frequent testing in 2025’s environment rather than less.
You can certainly hire international firms, but there are trade-offs. International non-Polish providers, especially well-known ones, might bring specific global expertise or niche experience that is hard to find locally. For example, if you need a very specialized industrial control system test and the world expert is a foreign firm, it could make sense. However, working with local Polish providers has distinct advantages: they understand the language which is crucial if your systems or staff use Polish, cultural context, and local regulations. A Polish firm will be familiar with national legislation like the Act on National Cybersecurity System implementing NIS directive or sectoral guidelines in Poland, which an international provider might not know in detail. Time zone and on-site availability is another factor a local team can be on-site quickly for things like internal testing or incident response, whereas an overseas team might incur travel delays or costs. There’s also often a cost benefit, as local rates might be more aligned with Polish market standards. Additionally, supporting the local cybersecurity ecosystem can have long-term benefits: better relationships, continuity, and local references. That said, many international firms have offices or teams in Poland e.g. Big Four consulting companies, giving you a blend of global and local presence. If you do go international, ensure they demonstrate familiarity with Polish/EU rules like GDPR, NIS2 and consider language for instance, if you need a security policy in Polish or training for Polish-speaking employees, will the provider handle that? In summary, if your needs can be met by a reputable Polish provider, there’s often no need to look further if you gain convenience and local insight. If a specific expertise is lacking locally, then bringing in an international firm or a global firm’s Polish branch is a fine approach. Many companies use a mix: local firms for most work, and international specialists for unique cases. The key is to choose a provider that can communicate effectively with your team and understands the context in which your business operates.
A vulnerability scan is an automated, high-level process that identifies known vulnerabilities, whereas a penetration test is a deeper, manual examination that attempts to actively exploit vulnerabilities and find complex security weaknesses. Think of a vulnerability scan as a security health check. A tool scans your systems servers, networks, applications against a database of known issues like missing patches or common misconfigurations and reports which known vulnerabilities are present. It’s fast and usually broad, but it often produces false positives or misses context-specific issues. By contrast, a penetration test is more like a simulated attack by skilled professionals: they use automated tools and manual techniques to not only find vulnerabilities, but also exploit them to prove impact, and uncover issues that scans can’t detect for example, chaining low-risk bugs into a major breach, or finding a logic flaw in an application. Penetration testers will think creatively they might discover a flaw that isn’t in any vulnerability database because it’s specific to your custom application. The output also differs: a scan might give you a long list of potential problems with generic descriptions, while a pentest report will give you validated findings with tailored explanations and proof of how an attacker could use them. In terms of usage, vulnerability scanning is great for routine checks and compliance; many standards require quarterly scans, and it can be handled by internal teams or as part of a managed service. Penetration testing, typically done annually or whenever major changes occur, provides deeper assurance it answers the question, Can someone actually break in or compromise critical data, and how?. Both are important: many organizations use vulnerability scans to maintain baseline hygiene e.g., catch if a new critical CVE appears on their network and use penetration tests to dive into the serious attack paths. Some modern providers integrate the two by offering continuous scanning with periodic human-led testing. But remember, running a scanner is not enough to declare you’ve security tested your systems; only a penetration test can truly simulate the cunning of a real attacker.
Choosing a top cybersecurity provider is a crucial decision that should be guided by unbiased research and a clear understanding of your needs. In compiling this list of the Top Cybersecurity Companies in Poland 2025, we have strived to remain neutral and analytical focusing on each provider’s strengths, weaknesses, and ideal fit. Cyber threats in 2025 continue to grow in sophistication, but the Polish market offers capable partners from global consultancies to homegrown specialists that can help organizations bolster their defenses and meet compliance obligations. Remember that best is contextual: the best provider for a large bank may differ from that for a tech startup. Use the methodology and insights in this article as a starting point for your evaluation. Engage in discussions with potential providers, ask for evidence of their claims, and perhaps even pilot a small project with the frontrunner to gauge the experience.
Above all, ensure the provider you choose prioritizes security outcomes over salesmanship. A true partner will be transparent, challenge your assumptions constructively, and work with your team to improve security in a meaningful way. We hope this ranking and guide have provided clarity and confidence to your selection process. With the right partner, you can navigate the cyber risks ahead with a trusted expert by your side and make informed, effective decisions to keep your organization safe.
About the Author
Mohammed Khalil is a Cybersecurity Architect at DeepStrike, specializing in advanced penetration testing and offensive security operations. With certifications including CISSP, OSCP, and OSWE, he has led numerous red team engagements for Fortune 500 companies, focusing on cloud security, application vulnerabilities, and adversary emulation. His work involves dissecting complex attack chains and developing resilient defense strategies for clients in the finance, healthcare, and technology sectors.
Stay secure with DeepStrike penetration testing services. Reach out for a quote or customized technical proposal today
Contact Us